分数尺寸大提琴与全尺寸大提琴的比较

Thomas E. Blanford, Micah R. Shepherd, Trevor W. Jerome
{"title":"分数尺寸大提琴与全尺寸大提琴的比较","authors":"Thomas E. Blanford, Micah R. Shepherd, Trevor W. Jerome","doi":"10.1121/2.0000841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fractional-sized cellos (3/4, 1/2, etc.) are designed for the same musical playing range as a full-sized (4/4) cello but with scaled proportions for players for whom a full-sized cello is too large. The strings are adjusted in order to compensate for the shorter string length of the smaller instruments and obtain the correct tuning. The cello body vibration, which is strongly coupled to the internal air cavity, would not be expected to scale in the same manner as the strings. This causes the bridge impedance seen by the strings on the fractional-sized cellos to differ from the bridge impedance seen by the strings on a full-sized cello. In this paper, the physical dimensions of a 1/2 and 3/4 cello are compared with a full cello. Drive point measurements are also compared to illustrate how the strings couple differently with the body of each size cello. The fractional-sized cellos are found to exhibit a slightly different sound due to the bridge impedance mismatch.Fractional-sized cellos (3/4, 1/2, etc.) are designed for the same musical playing range as a full-sized (4/4) cello but with scaled proportions for players for whom a full-sized cello is too large. The strings are adjusted in order to compensate for the shorter string length of the smaller instruments and obtain the correct tuning. The cello body vibration, which is strongly coupled to the internal air cavity, would not be expected to scale in the same manner as the strings. This causes the bridge impedance seen by the strings on the fractional-sized cellos to differ from the bridge impedance seen by the strings on a full-sized cello. In this paper, the physical dimensions of a 1/2 and 3/4 cello are compared with a full cello. Drive point measurements are also compared to illustrate how the strings couple differently with the body of each size cello. The fractional-sized cellos are found to exhibit a slightly different sound due to the bridge impedance mismatch.","PeriodicalId":20469,"journal":{"name":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of fractional-sized to full-sized cellos\",\"authors\":\"Thomas E. Blanford, Micah R. Shepherd, Trevor W. Jerome\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/2.0000841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fractional-sized cellos (3/4, 1/2, etc.) are designed for the same musical playing range as a full-sized (4/4) cello but with scaled proportions for players for whom a full-sized cello is too large. The strings are adjusted in order to compensate for the shorter string length of the smaller instruments and obtain the correct tuning. The cello body vibration, which is strongly coupled to the internal air cavity, would not be expected to scale in the same manner as the strings. This causes the bridge impedance seen by the strings on the fractional-sized cellos to differ from the bridge impedance seen by the strings on a full-sized cello. In this paper, the physical dimensions of a 1/2 and 3/4 cello are compared with a full cello. Drive point measurements are also compared to illustrate how the strings couple differently with the body of each size cello. The fractional-sized cellos are found to exhibit a slightly different sound due to the bridge impedance mismatch.Fractional-sized cellos (3/4, 1/2, etc.) are designed for the same musical playing range as a full-sized (4/4) cello but with scaled proportions for players for whom a full-sized cello is too large. The strings are adjusted in order to compensate for the shorter string length of the smaller instruments and obtain the correct tuning. The cello body vibration, which is strongly coupled to the internal air cavity, would not be expected to scale in the same manner as the strings. This causes the bridge impedance seen by the strings on the fractional-sized cellos to differ from the bridge impedance seen by the strings on a full-sized cello. In this paper, the physical dimensions of a 1/2 and 3/4 cello are compared with a full cello. Drive point measurements are also compared to illustrate how the strings couple differently with the body of each size cello. The fractional-sized cellos are found to exhibit a slightly different sound due to the bridge impedance mismatch.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proc. Meet. Acoust.\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proc. Meet. Acoust.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. Meet. Acoust.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分数尺寸大提琴(3/4,1/2等)是为与全尺寸大提琴(4/4)相同的音乐演奏范围而设计的,但是对于那些全尺寸大提琴太大的演奏者来说,它的比例是缩放的。调整琴弦是为了补偿较小乐器的较短的琴弦长度,从而获得正确的调音。大提琴本体的振动与内部的空腔紧密相连,不能像琴弦那样有同样的音阶。这导致小尺寸大提琴上的琴弦所看到的桥阻抗与全尺寸大提琴上的琴弦所看到的桥阻抗不同。本文将1/2大提琴和3/4大提琴的物理尺寸与全大提琴进行了比较。驱动点测量也比较,以说明如何弦夫妇不同的身体,每个尺寸的大提琴。由于桥阻抗不匹配,分数尺寸的大提琴表现出略微不同的声音。分数尺寸大提琴(3/4,1/2等)是为与全尺寸大提琴(4/4)相同的音乐演奏范围而设计的,但是对于那些全尺寸大提琴太大的演奏者来说,它的比例是缩放的。调整琴弦是为了补偿较小乐器的较短的琴弦长度,从而获得正确的调音。大提琴本体的振动与内部的空腔紧密相连,不能像琴弦那样有同样的音阶。这导致小尺寸大提琴上的琴弦所看到的桥阻抗与全尺寸大提琴上的琴弦所看到的桥阻抗不同。本文将1/2大提琴和3/4大提琴的物理尺寸与全大提琴进行了比较。驱动点测量也比较,以说明如何弦夫妇不同的身体,每个尺寸的大提琴。由于桥阻抗不匹配,分数尺寸的大提琴表现出略微不同的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparison of fractional-sized to full-sized cellos
Fractional-sized cellos (3/4, 1/2, etc.) are designed for the same musical playing range as a full-sized (4/4) cello but with scaled proportions for players for whom a full-sized cello is too large. The strings are adjusted in order to compensate for the shorter string length of the smaller instruments and obtain the correct tuning. The cello body vibration, which is strongly coupled to the internal air cavity, would not be expected to scale in the same manner as the strings. This causes the bridge impedance seen by the strings on the fractional-sized cellos to differ from the bridge impedance seen by the strings on a full-sized cello. In this paper, the physical dimensions of a 1/2 and 3/4 cello are compared with a full cello. Drive point measurements are also compared to illustrate how the strings couple differently with the body of each size cello. The fractional-sized cellos are found to exhibit a slightly different sound due to the bridge impedance mismatch.Fractional-sized cellos (3/4, 1/2, etc.) are designed for the same musical playing range as a full-sized (4/4) cello but with scaled proportions for players for whom a full-sized cello is too large. The strings are adjusted in order to compensate for the shorter string length of the smaller instruments and obtain the correct tuning. The cello body vibration, which is strongly coupled to the internal air cavity, would not be expected to scale in the same manner as the strings. This causes the bridge impedance seen by the strings on the fractional-sized cellos to differ from the bridge impedance seen by the strings on a full-sized cello. In this paper, the physical dimensions of a 1/2 and 3/4 cello are compared with a full cello. Drive point measurements are also compared to illustrate how the strings couple differently with the body of each size cello. The fractional-sized cellos are found to exhibit a slightly different sound due to the bridge impedance mismatch.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Different origins of acoustic streaming at resonance Clinical studies of biceps anisotropy, relaxation and nonlinearity with a medical device for ultrasonic imaging Prospective medical applications of Nonlinear Time Reversal Acoustics Nonlinear relaxation in geomaterials: New results Numerical investigation of self-focused Lamb waves in anisotropic media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1