形式逻辑思维:一种评估中等教育第一阶段受试者的工具的建议

S. M. Vázquez, M. V. Rapetti, M. Noriega
{"title":"形式逻辑思维:一种评估中等教育第一阶段受试者的工具的建议","authors":"S. M. Vázquez, M. V. Rapetti, M. Noriega","doi":"10.46553/rpsi.19.37.2023.p23-36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of formal thought is addressed, a Piagetian theme that has not lost its validity. The objectives of this work are: (a) To study the psychometric properties of an instrument for the evaluation of formal operative performance elaborated ad hoc from the Longeot (TOFLP) and Flexer and Roberge (FORT) tests; (b) Verify the order of acquisition of the formal operations evaluated in the proposed instrument. A scalographic analysis of the items (Guttman technique) shows that the consistency and reproducibility indices are satisfactory and that the sequence of achievements and level of difficulty of each item conform to Piagetian theory. The validity and consistency of the instrument is tested.","PeriodicalId":21224,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El Pensamiento Lógico Formal: Propuesta de un Instrumento para su Evaluación en Sujetos del Primer Nivel de Educación Media\",\"authors\":\"S. M. Vázquez, M. V. Rapetti, M. Noriega\",\"doi\":\"10.46553/rpsi.19.37.2023.p23-36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of formal thought is addressed, a Piagetian theme that has not lost its validity. The objectives of this work are: (a) To study the psychometric properties of an instrument for the evaluation of formal operative performance elaborated ad hoc from the Longeot (TOFLP) and Flexer and Roberge (FORT) tests; (b) Verify the order of acquisition of the formal operations evaluated in the proposed instrument. A scalographic analysis of the items (Guttman technique) shows that the consistency and reproducibility indices are satisfactory and that the sequence of achievements and level of difficulty of each item conform to Piagetian theory. The validity and consistency of the instrument is tested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46553/rpsi.19.37.2023.p23-36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/rpsi.19.37.2023.p23-36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

形式思想的问题得到了解决,这是一个皮亚杰的主题,并没有失去其有效性。这项工作的目的是:(a)研究一种评估正式手术表现的工具的心理测量特性,该工具是由Longeot (TOFLP)和Flexer和Roberge (FORT)测试专门设计的;(b)核实拟议仪器中评估的正式操作的获取顺序。对项目的尺度分析(Guttman技术)表明,一致性和再现性指标令人满意,并且每个项目的成就顺序和难度水平符合皮亚杰理论。测试了仪器的有效性和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
El Pensamiento Lógico Formal: Propuesta de un Instrumento para su Evaluación en Sujetos del Primer Nivel de Educación Media
The issue of formal thought is addressed, a Piagetian theme that has not lost its validity. The objectives of this work are: (a) To study the psychometric properties of an instrument for the evaluation of formal operative performance elaborated ad hoc from the Longeot (TOFLP) and Flexer and Roberge (FORT) tests; (b) Verify the order of acquisition of the formal operations evaluated in the proposed instrument. A scalographic analysis of the items (Guttman technique) shows that the consistency and reproducibility indices are satisfactory and that the sequence of achievements and level of difficulty of each item conform to Piagetian theory. The validity and consistency of the instrument is tested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perfiles Lingüísticos Iniciales en Escolares de 4 y 5 Años Emojis en Tareas de Categorización. Una Nueva Forma de Evaluar el Conocimiento Conceptual Efectividad de Facilitadores del Uso de Dispositivos Tecnológicos en Tareas de Estimulación Cognitiva en Adultos Mayores Resiliencia y Flexibilidad Cognitiva en Niños y Niñas de Contextos Vulnerables Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Behavior in Adolescents and Neuropsychology: An Integrative Review From 2015 to 2022
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1