"保守先锋":南非女医务人员协会的成立。

L. Walker
{"title":"\"保守先锋\":南非女医务人员协会的成立。","authors":"L. Walker","doi":"10.1093/SHM/14.3.483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the professional struggles for the South African Society of Medical Women during the 1950s and 1960s. Drawing on interview and archival material, it details their first two campaigns. The first aimed to raise the retirement age of women doctors to bring it in line with their male colleagues, and the second sought to abolish the marriage bar which prevented married women from working in the public service. The research revealed them to have been successful in their endeavours. The article argues that their success was largely due to their conservative gender and racial ideology. The Society sought inclusion into the profession in ways which suited the interests of both men and the state. They widened women's access to the profession without upsetting the gender hierarchies of the medical profession. While their conservative 'gender' strategies facilitated their professional inclusion, so too did their race. This article argues that their whiteness ensured that they were the beneficiaries of racial inclusion in a profession structured by racist conventions and divided along racial lines.","PeriodicalId":68213,"journal":{"name":"医疗社会史研究","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Conservative pioneers': the formation of the South African Society of Medical Women.\",\"authors\":\"L. Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/SHM/14.3.483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the professional struggles for the South African Society of Medical Women during the 1950s and 1960s. Drawing on interview and archival material, it details their first two campaigns. The first aimed to raise the retirement age of women doctors to bring it in line with their male colleagues, and the second sought to abolish the marriage bar which prevented married women from working in the public service. The research revealed them to have been successful in their endeavours. The article argues that their success was largely due to their conservative gender and racial ideology. The Society sought inclusion into the profession in ways which suited the interests of both men and the state. They widened women's access to the profession without upsetting the gender hierarchies of the medical profession. While their conservative 'gender' strategies facilitated their professional inclusion, so too did their race. This article argues that their whiteness ensured that they were the beneficiaries of racial inclusion in a profession structured by racist conventions and divided along racial lines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"医疗社会史研究\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"医疗社会史研究\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/SHM/14.3.483\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"医疗社会史研究","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SHM/14.3.483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文分析了20世纪50年代和60年代南非医务妇女协会的职业斗争。根据采访和档案资料,本书详细介绍了他们的前两次活动。第一个法案旨在提高女医生的退休年龄,使其与男同事保持一致,第二个法案试图废除阻止已婚妇女从事公共服务工作的婚姻禁令。研究表明,他们的努力取得了成功。文章认为,他们的成功很大程度上是由于他们保守的性别和种族意识形态。该协会寻求以符合个人和国家利益的方式加入这个行业。他们扩大了妇女进入医疗行业的机会,但没有打破医疗行业的性别等级制度。虽然她们保守的“性别”策略促进了她们的职业包容,但她们的种族也促进了她们的职业包容。这篇文章认为,他们的白人身份确保了他们在一个由种族主义惯例构成并按种族划分的职业中成为种族包容的受益者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
'Conservative pioneers': the formation of the South African Society of Medical Women.
This article analyses the professional struggles for the South African Society of Medical Women during the 1950s and 1960s. Drawing on interview and archival material, it details their first two campaigns. The first aimed to raise the retirement age of women doctors to bring it in line with their male colleagues, and the second sought to abolish the marriage bar which prevented married women from working in the public service. The research revealed them to have been successful in their endeavours. The article argues that their success was largely due to their conservative gender and racial ideology. The Society sought inclusion into the profession in ways which suited the interests of both men and the state. They widened women's access to the profession without upsetting the gender hierarchies of the medical profession. While their conservative 'gender' strategies facilitated their professional inclusion, so too did their race. This article argues that their whiteness ensured that they were the beneficiaries of racial inclusion in a profession structured by racist conventions and divided along racial lines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
140
期刊最新文献
Erratum: The 'Miracle of Childbirth': the Portrayal of Parturient Women in Medieval Miracle Narratives. Erratum: Beyond the Medical Text: Health and Illness in Early Medieval Italian Sources. Review: A Social History of Psychology The Chinese Medicine in Contemporary China: Plurality and Synthesis Medical education at St Bartholomew's hospital 1123-1995
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1