{"title":"腐败案件中消灭罪犯理由的适用","authors":"Ifrani Ifrani, Noor Reza Ihsan","doi":"10.24815/kanun.v23i3.23241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to find out the application of the reasons for the elimination of criminals in cases of corruption. The results of this study are case number: 87/Pid.Sus/2010/PN.Mrb, which was strengthened in the Supreme Court's Cassation decision number: 321 K/Pid.Sus/2011, was wrong in applying the excuse of forgiveness as the reason for eliminating the crime in its legal considerations, where the element of forgiving reason applied by the Panel of Judges was not fulfilled, but the justifying reason should be applied because one of the elements of Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of criminal acts of corruption was not fulfilled because it relied on legal facts and expert testimony without mentioning in detail and with certainty who was benefited from the act, so the implication in this case is that the defendant should be acquitted (vrisjpraak).","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the Reasons for Elimination of Criminals in Cases of Corruption\",\"authors\":\"Ifrani Ifrani, Noor Reza Ihsan\",\"doi\":\"10.24815/kanun.v23i3.23241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to find out the application of the reasons for the elimination of criminals in cases of corruption. The results of this study are case number: 87/Pid.Sus/2010/PN.Mrb, which was strengthened in the Supreme Court's Cassation decision number: 321 K/Pid.Sus/2011, was wrong in applying the excuse of forgiveness as the reason for eliminating the crime in its legal considerations, where the element of forgiving reason applied by the Panel of Judges was not fulfilled, but the justifying reason should be applied because one of the elements of Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of criminal acts of corruption was not fulfilled because it relied on legal facts and expert testimony without mentioning in detail and with certainty who was benefited from the act, so the implication in this case is that the defendant should be acquitted (vrisjpraak).\",\"PeriodicalId\":31748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i3.23241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i3.23241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是找出在贪污案件中消灭罪犯的理由的应用。本研究结果为病例号:87/Pid.Sus/2010/PN。mr . b .,这在最高法院的撤销判决中得到了加强:321 K/Pid。Sus/2011在其法律考虑中将宽恕的理由作为消除该罪行的理由是错误的,因为法官小组所适用的宽恕理由的要素没有得到满足。但应该适用正当理由,因为经2001年第20号法律修订的关于根除腐败犯罪行为的1999年第31号法律第3条的一个要素没有实现,因为它依赖法律事实和专家证词,而没有详细和确定地提到谁从该行为中受益,因此在这个案件中的含义是被告应该被无罪释放(vrisjpraak)。
Application of the Reasons for Elimination of Criminals in Cases of Corruption
The purpose of this study was to find out the application of the reasons for the elimination of criminals in cases of corruption. The results of this study are case number: 87/Pid.Sus/2010/PN.Mrb, which was strengthened in the Supreme Court's Cassation decision number: 321 K/Pid.Sus/2011, was wrong in applying the excuse of forgiveness as the reason for eliminating the crime in its legal considerations, where the element of forgiving reason applied by the Panel of Judges was not fulfilled, but the justifying reason should be applied because one of the elements of Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the eradication of criminal acts of corruption was not fulfilled because it relied on legal facts and expert testimony without mentioning in detail and with certainty who was benefited from the act, so the implication in this case is that the defendant should be acquitted (vrisjpraak).