英语本科生对素材的使用:过程写作的挑战与成功

Q3 Arts and Humanities Language Related Research Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.52547/lrr.13.3.11
L. Makovskaya, Saida Radjabzade
{"title":"英语本科生对素材的使用:过程写作的挑战与成功","authors":"L. Makovskaya, Saida Radjabzade","doi":"10.52547/lrr.13.3.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proper use of source material in second language writing is an essential skill in the academic writing process. The present study investigates source use and plagiarism level in the essay writing process by the English as a foreign language (EFL) student in one of the international universities in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Thirteen first-year students who failed and then retook the language program were chosen for the purpose of the study. A mixed-methods research design was used to collect the data (i.e., language programs over two subsequent academic years were analyzed for their relevance to the process-based writing). To evaluate the students' opinions on both programs and correct academic citation, a paper-based questionnaire was circulated. The data analysis revealed a positive influence of program two on organizing ideas, incorporating source-text ideas, and using more academic and error-free sentences. A comparative analysis of the plagiarism level and writing performance in students' papers in both programs was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which showed a positive difference in the overall writing scores but an insignificant difference in the level of plagiarism. Findings of the study identified that the engagement of the EFL undergraduate students in process-based writing made a positive impact on writing from sources and overall performance.","PeriodicalId":53465,"journal":{"name":"Language Related Research","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source Use by EFL Undergraduate Students: Challenges and Success in Process-based Writing\",\"authors\":\"L. Makovskaya, Saida Radjabzade\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/lrr.13.3.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proper use of source material in second language writing is an essential skill in the academic writing process. The present study investigates source use and plagiarism level in the essay writing process by the English as a foreign language (EFL) student in one of the international universities in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Thirteen first-year students who failed and then retook the language program were chosen for the purpose of the study. A mixed-methods research design was used to collect the data (i.e., language programs over two subsequent academic years were analyzed for their relevance to the process-based writing). To evaluate the students' opinions on both programs and correct academic citation, a paper-based questionnaire was circulated. The data analysis revealed a positive influence of program two on organizing ideas, incorporating source-text ideas, and using more academic and error-free sentences. A comparative analysis of the plagiarism level and writing performance in students' papers in both programs was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which showed a positive difference in the overall writing scores but an insignificant difference in the level of plagiarism. Findings of the study identified that the engagement of the EFL undergraduate students in process-based writing made a positive impact on writing from sources and overall performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Related Research\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/lrr.13.3.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/lrr.13.3.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在第二语言写作中正确使用原始材料是学术写作过程中的一项基本技能。本研究调查了乌兹别克斯坦塔什干一所国际大学的英语作为外语(EFL)学生在论文写作过程中的来源使用和抄袭水平。为了研究的目的,我们选择了13名一年级的学生,他们在考试失败后重新参加了语言课程。使用混合方法研究设计来收集数据(即,分析随后两个学年的语言课程与基于过程的写作的相关性)。为了评估学生对这两个项目和正确的学术引用的意见,我们发放了一份纸质问卷。数据分析显示,程序二在组织观点、整合原文观点、使用更多学术和无错误的句子方面产生了积极影响。采用Wilcoxon sign -rank检验对两组学生论文的抄袭水平和写作水平进行比较分析,结果显示,两组学生的总体写作成绩差异为正,而抄袭水平差异不显著。研究发现,英语本科学生参与基于过程的写作对写作来源和整体表现产生了积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Source Use by EFL Undergraduate Students: Challenges and Success in Process-based Writing
Proper use of source material in second language writing is an essential skill in the academic writing process. The present study investigates source use and plagiarism level in the essay writing process by the English as a foreign language (EFL) student in one of the international universities in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Thirteen first-year students who failed and then retook the language program were chosen for the purpose of the study. A mixed-methods research design was used to collect the data (i.e., language programs over two subsequent academic years were analyzed for their relevance to the process-based writing). To evaluate the students' opinions on both programs and correct academic citation, a paper-based questionnaire was circulated. The data analysis revealed a positive influence of program two on organizing ideas, incorporating source-text ideas, and using more academic and error-free sentences. A comparative analysis of the plagiarism level and writing performance in students' papers in both programs was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, which showed a positive difference in the overall writing scores but an insignificant difference in the level of plagiarism. Findings of the study identified that the engagement of the EFL undergraduate students in process-based writing made a positive impact on writing from sources and overall performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language Related Research
Language Related Research Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Language Related Research is a platform to develop scientific thought in the specific fields of language sciences, enunciation and discourse. Accordingly, Language Related Research journal welcomes the original articles with theoretical, analytical and field work backgrounds. The Journal highly recommends the scholars avoid clichés and tautology with special focus on the diversity in the field of theorizing and applied background of language, corpus based studies and reference to the main domestic and international research. In the own field of theorizing and mindfulness however, issue-driven analysis based on original hypothesis, field works with quantitative and applied domain have the scientific priority for the journal.
期刊最新文献
Word-initial Voicing Contrast in Khuzestani Arabic Stops Developing and Validating a Questionnaire on EFL Teachers’ Beliefs about Task-based Language Teaching (TBLT) L2 Grit and Foreign Language Enjoyment: Arguments in Light of Control-Value Theory and Its Methodological Compatibility Revisiting Research on Positive Psychology in Second and Foreign Language Education: Trends and Directions The Effect of Topic on EFL Writing by Vietnamese Tertiary Students: Insights from Combining a Lexical Richness Analysis with Student Self-Reports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1