西班牙社会工作专业化的风险

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE ARQ Pub Date : 2018-01-08 DOI:10.5209/CUTS.54344
A. Echegaray
{"title":"西班牙社会工作专业化的风险","authors":"A. Echegaray","doi":"10.5209/CUTS.54344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article relates de-professionalization theory to the current state of social work in Spain. De-professionalization refers to the process of erosion of the monopoly on knowledge as a consequence of loss of professional autonomy and authority. The conceptual elements of this theory are applied to social work and five factors that impact on the de-professionalization process are studied: a) the policy of precariousness in the provision of social services; b) the increasing precariousness of the job market; c) the bureaucratization of the professional field and activity; d) the codification and standardization of intervention; and e) fragmentation of the knowledge process. Bases are established to comprehend the risks that social work faces as a profession, and professional autonomy is emphasized from the perspective of ethics and reinforcement of scientific foundations.","PeriodicalId":43591,"journal":{"name":"ARQ","volume":"44 1","pages":"139-152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Los riesgos en la profesionalización del Trabajo Social en España\",\"authors\":\"A. Echegaray\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/CUTS.54344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article relates de-professionalization theory to the current state of social work in Spain. De-professionalization refers to the process of erosion of the monopoly on knowledge as a consequence of loss of professional autonomy and authority. The conceptual elements of this theory are applied to social work and five factors that impact on the de-professionalization process are studied: a) the policy of precariousness in the provision of social services; b) the increasing precariousness of the job market; c) the bureaucratization of the professional field and activity; d) the codification and standardization of intervention; and e) fragmentation of the knowledge process. Bases are established to comprehend the risks that social work faces as a profession, and professional autonomy is emphasized from the perspective of ethics and reinforcement of scientific foundations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARQ\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"139-152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARQ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/CUTS.54344\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/CUTS.54344","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文将去专业化理论与西班牙社会工作的现状联系起来。去专业化指的是由于专业自主权和权威的丧失而导致的对知识垄断的侵蚀过程。将这一理论的概念要素应用于社会工作,并研究了影响去专业化过程的五个因素:a)社会服务提供中的不稳定政策;B,就业市场越来越不稳定;C)专业领域和活动的官僚化;D)干预的法典化和标准化;e)知识过程的碎片化。建立了理解社会工作作为一种职业所面临的风险的基础,并从伦理和强化科学基础的角度强调了职业自主性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Los riesgos en la profesionalización del Trabajo Social en España
This article relates de-professionalization theory to the current state of social work in Spain. De-professionalization refers to the process of erosion of the monopoly on knowledge as a consequence of loss of professional autonomy and authority. The conceptual elements of this theory are applied to social work and five factors that impact on the de-professionalization process are studied: a) the policy of precariousness in the provision of social services; b) the increasing precariousness of the job market; c) the bureaucratization of the professional field and activity; d) the codification and standardization of intervention; and e) fragmentation of the knowledge process. Bases are established to comprehend the risks that social work faces as a profession, and professional autonomy is emphasized from the perspective of ethics and reinforcement of scientific foundations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARQ
ARQ ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: ARQ is a journal of the School of Architecture of the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile and is part of the periodical publications of the University. ARQ is a quarterly publication aimed at professionals and academics, and dedicated to the dissemination of a critical selection of the architecture of Chile and South America and its related disciplines of ARQ Each issue addresses a theme that gives way to the editing, prioritizing excellence and variety of items, both papers as works and projects. The relationship with the academic world allows a permanent contact with international journals of architecture, with whom we develop regular exchanges.
期刊最新文献
Automatización resiliente: hacia una planetariedad no-antropocéntrica Un diccionario crítico de distancias. Un inventario de clausura Pabellón 170 años de arquitectura Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile THE CRISIS AND SPATIALITY OF CARE IN A PANDEMIC: Housing and Neighborhoods in Santiago de Chile Rendueles, C. (2020) Contra la igualdad de oportunidades. Un panfleto igualitarista. (1ª ed.). Barcelona: Editorial Seix Barral.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1