{"title":"远程工作心态预测家庭办公室的情绪和工作效率:一项对2019冠状病毒病大流行期间知识型员工的纵向研究","authors":"Lauren C. Howe, Jochen I. Menges","doi":"10.1080/07370024.2021.1987238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decades, developments in information and communication technologies have enabled more and more employees to work from locations other than the office (Stiles & Smart, 2021; ter Hoeven & van Zoonen, 2015) in what has come to be interchangeably called remote work, telecommuting, or distributed work (Allen et al., 2015). This trend has attracted much scholarly attention, in particular the question of how remote work can be implemented in optimal ways for employees and organizations (Golden, 2009; Messenger & Gschwind, 2016; Shin et al., 2000). A new urgency was brought to the study of remote work when the COVID-19 pandemic prompted organizations across the world to shift their workforce unexpectedly and rapidly to home office (Hickman & Saad, 2020). In light of the crisis, many organizations have planned to increase the amount of remote work available to employees, including “tech giants” such as Twitter that announced employees can work remotely forever if they desire (British Broadcasting Corporation, 2020; Dwoskin, 2020). Accordingly, scholars and practitioners alike predict that in the aftermath of the global crisis, remote work will be part of the “new normal” (EY Belgium, 2020; DeArmas, 2020; Leonardi, Leonardi, 2021; Lueck, 2020), prompting a call for more research on factors that increase employee well-being and productivity when working in remote environments and using technology to work remotely (Dwivedi et al., 2020). An increase in remote work would strongly impact the careers of knowledge workers, given that knowledge-intensive jobs tend to be especially well-suited to remote work (Desilver, 2020). For example, computer and mathematical occupations have a high share of tasks that can be done from home, as do jobs in the information and communication industry (e.g., software developers and publishers can both complete an estimated 89% of their tasks at home) (Adams-Prassl et al., 2020). Many knowledge workers expect that remote work will increase in their industry in the future (Slack, 2020). Indeed, the shift toward remote work during the COVID-19 crisis was particularly pronounced among knowledge workers, with over one quarter of all knowledge workers in the U.S. (amounting to over 16 million people) estimated to have shifted to remote work in the first weeks after the pandemic was officially declared (Slack, 2020). Helping knowledge workers to transition effectively to remote work is thus an important goal in a future that involves increased remote work. In particular, how transitions to remote work affect productivity has long been a practical interest for organizations contemplating increased remote work (Karnowski & White, 2002). Productivity during remote work has also been a key theoretical interest for a variety of academic fields, including human-computer interaction (Olson & Olson, 2000), computer science and engineering (Ruth & Chaudhry, 2008; Turetken et al., 2011), information systems (Neufeld & Fang, 2005), management (Choudhury et al., 2021; Staples et al., 1999), psychology (Allen et al., 2015), economics (Bloom et al.,","PeriodicalId":56306,"journal":{"name":"Human-Computer Interaction","volume":"46 1","pages":"481 - 507"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote work mindsets predict emotions and productivity in home office: A longitudinal study of knowledge workers during the Covid-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"Lauren C. Howe, Jochen I. Menges\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07370024.2021.1987238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past decades, developments in information and communication technologies have enabled more and more employees to work from locations other than the office (Stiles & Smart, 2021; ter Hoeven & van Zoonen, 2015) in what has come to be interchangeably called remote work, telecommuting, or distributed work (Allen et al., 2015). This trend has attracted much scholarly attention, in particular the question of how remote work can be implemented in optimal ways for employees and organizations (Golden, 2009; Messenger & Gschwind, 2016; Shin et al., 2000). A new urgency was brought to the study of remote work when the COVID-19 pandemic prompted organizations across the world to shift their workforce unexpectedly and rapidly to home office (Hickman & Saad, 2020). In light of the crisis, many organizations have planned to increase the amount of remote work available to employees, including “tech giants” such as Twitter that announced employees can work remotely forever if they desire (British Broadcasting Corporation, 2020; Dwoskin, 2020). Accordingly, scholars and practitioners alike predict that in the aftermath of the global crisis, remote work will be part of the “new normal” (EY Belgium, 2020; DeArmas, 2020; Leonardi, Leonardi, 2021; Lueck, 2020), prompting a call for more research on factors that increase employee well-being and productivity when working in remote environments and using technology to work remotely (Dwivedi et al., 2020). An increase in remote work would strongly impact the careers of knowledge workers, given that knowledge-intensive jobs tend to be especially well-suited to remote work (Desilver, 2020). For example, computer and mathematical occupations have a high share of tasks that can be done from home, as do jobs in the information and communication industry (e.g., software developers and publishers can both complete an estimated 89% of their tasks at home) (Adams-Prassl et al., 2020). Many knowledge workers expect that remote work will increase in their industry in the future (Slack, 2020). Indeed, the shift toward remote work during the COVID-19 crisis was particularly pronounced among knowledge workers, with over one quarter of all knowledge workers in the U.S. (amounting to over 16 million people) estimated to have shifted to remote work in the first weeks after the pandemic was officially declared (Slack, 2020). Helping knowledge workers to transition effectively to remote work is thus an important goal in a future that involves increased remote work. In particular, how transitions to remote work affect productivity has long been a practical interest for organizations contemplating increased remote work (Karnowski & White, 2002). Productivity during remote work has also been a key theoretical interest for a variety of academic fields, including human-computer interaction (Olson & Olson, 2000), computer science and engineering (Ruth & Chaudhry, 2008; Turetken et al., 2011), information systems (Neufeld & Fang, 2005), management (Choudhury et al., 2021; Staples et al., 1999), psychology (Allen et al., 2015), economics (Bloom et al.,\",\"PeriodicalId\":56306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human-Computer Interaction\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"481 - 507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human-Computer Interaction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1987238\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human-Computer Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2021.1987238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, CYBERNETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
摘要
在过去的几十年里,信息和通信技术的发展使越来越多的员工能够在办公室以外的地方工作(Stiles & Smart, 2021;ter Hoeven & van Zoonen, 2015),现在可以互换称为远程工作、远程办公或分布式工作(Allen et al., 2015)。这一趋势引起了学术界的广泛关注,特别是关于如何以最佳方式为员工和组织实施远程工作的问题(Golden, 2009;Messenger & Gschwind, 2016;Shin et al., 2000)。当COVID-19大流行促使世界各地的组织意外而迅速地将员工转移到家庭办公室时,远程工作的研究带来了新的紧迫性(Hickman & Saad, 2020)。鉴于这场危机,许多组织都计划增加员工可远程工作的数量,包括Twitter等“科技巨头”宣布,如果员工愿意,他们可以永远远程工作(英国广播公司,2020;Dwoskin, 2020)。因此,学者和从业者都预测,在全球危机之后,远程工作将成为“新常态”的一部分(EY Belgium, 2020;DeArmas, 2020;列奥纳迪,列奥纳迪,2021;Lueck, 2020),这促使人们呼吁更多地研究在远程环境中工作和使用技术远程工作时提高员工幸福感和生产力的因素(Dwivedi等人,2020)。远程工作的增加将对知识工作者的职业生涯产生强烈影响,因为知识密集型工作往往特别适合远程工作(Desilver, 2020)。例如,计算机和数学职业有很高的任务份额可以在家里完成,信息和通信行业的工作也是如此(例如,软件开发人员和出版商都可以在家里完成大约89%的任务)(Adams-Prassl等人,2020)。许多知识工作者预计,未来远程工作将在他们的行业中增加(Slack, 2020)。事实上,在COVID-19危机期间,向远程工作的转变在知识工作者中尤为明显,据估计,在正式宣布大流行后的头几周,美国超过四分之一的知识工作者(总计超过1600万人)已经转向远程工作(Slack, 2020)。因此,帮助知识工作者有效地过渡到远程工作是未来远程工作增加的一个重要目标。特别是,对于考虑增加远程工作的组织来说,过渡到远程工作如何影响生产力一直是一个实际的兴趣(Karnowski & White, 2002)。远程工作期间的生产力也一直是各种学术领域的关键理论兴趣,包括人机交互(Olson & Olson, 2000),计算机科学与工程(Ruth & Chaudhry, 2008;Turetken et al., 2011),信息系统(Neufeld & Fang, 2005),管理(Choudhury et al., 2021;Staples et al., 1999),心理学(Allen et al., 2015),经济学(Bloom et al.,
Remote work mindsets predict emotions and productivity in home office: A longitudinal study of knowledge workers during the Covid-19 pandemic
Over the past decades, developments in information and communication technologies have enabled more and more employees to work from locations other than the office (Stiles & Smart, 2021; ter Hoeven & van Zoonen, 2015) in what has come to be interchangeably called remote work, telecommuting, or distributed work (Allen et al., 2015). This trend has attracted much scholarly attention, in particular the question of how remote work can be implemented in optimal ways for employees and organizations (Golden, 2009; Messenger & Gschwind, 2016; Shin et al., 2000). A new urgency was brought to the study of remote work when the COVID-19 pandemic prompted organizations across the world to shift their workforce unexpectedly and rapidly to home office (Hickman & Saad, 2020). In light of the crisis, many organizations have planned to increase the amount of remote work available to employees, including “tech giants” such as Twitter that announced employees can work remotely forever if they desire (British Broadcasting Corporation, 2020; Dwoskin, 2020). Accordingly, scholars and practitioners alike predict that in the aftermath of the global crisis, remote work will be part of the “new normal” (EY Belgium, 2020; DeArmas, 2020; Leonardi, Leonardi, 2021; Lueck, 2020), prompting a call for more research on factors that increase employee well-being and productivity when working in remote environments and using technology to work remotely (Dwivedi et al., 2020). An increase in remote work would strongly impact the careers of knowledge workers, given that knowledge-intensive jobs tend to be especially well-suited to remote work (Desilver, 2020). For example, computer and mathematical occupations have a high share of tasks that can be done from home, as do jobs in the information and communication industry (e.g., software developers and publishers can both complete an estimated 89% of their tasks at home) (Adams-Prassl et al., 2020). Many knowledge workers expect that remote work will increase in their industry in the future (Slack, 2020). Indeed, the shift toward remote work during the COVID-19 crisis was particularly pronounced among knowledge workers, with over one quarter of all knowledge workers in the U.S. (amounting to over 16 million people) estimated to have shifted to remote work in the first weeks after the pandemic was officially declared (Slack, 2020). Helping knowledge workers to transition effectively to remote work is thus an important goal in a future that involves increased remote work. In particular, how transitions to remote work affect productivity has long been a practical interest for organizations contemplating increased remote work (Karnowski & White, 2002). Productivity during remote work has also been a key theoretical interest for a variety of academic fields, including human-computer interaction (Olson & Olson, 2000), computer science and engineering (Ruth & Chaudhry, 2008; Turetken et al., 2011), information systems (Neufeld & Fang, 2005), management (Choudhury et al., 2021; Staples et al., 1999), psychology (Allen et al., 2015), economics (Bloom et al.,
期刊介绍:
Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) is a multidisciplinary journal defining and reporting
on fundamental research in human-computer interaction. The goal of HCI is to be a journal
of the highest quality that combines the best research and design work to extend our
understanding of human-computer interaction. The target audience is the research
community with an interest in both the scientific implications and practical relevance of
how interactive computer systems should be designed and how they are actually used. HCI is
concerned with the theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues of interaction science
and system design as it affects the user.