Aneta Goździńska-Skóra, Wojciech Zatoń
{"title":"Zasady uczciwego obrotu w teorii i praktyce","authors":"Aneta Goździńska-Skóra, Wojciech Zatoń","doi":"10.18778/2391-6478.1.33.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article: General clauses are an important element of the legal system. They supplement the law regulations taking into account moral norms commonly accepted in society. Their general nature means that they are the subject of both discussions in the legal literature and comments and references in court decisions. The specificity of general clauses and the need to precise them in each case in which they are applied, result in a certain unpredictability of judgments. One of the most famous general clauses is the clause of principles of social coexistence. It appeared in the Polish legal system after World War II along with the new political system. It replaced the principle of good manners used in the Second Polish Republic. Since 1990, the return of the name of this principle to the Polish legal system has been visible. On the other hand, in legal regulations relating to the capital market, the clause of the principles of fair trade is used. It can be considered that the nature of the three clauses mentioned above is similar. The aim of the article is to analyze the nature and similarity of these general clauses with particular emphasis on the clause of the principles of fair trade in the capital market. Methodology: The study is theoretical and empirical in nature. The theoretical part was based on a review of the literature. The empirical part is realized by the analysis of the court decisions. Results of the research: The results show that the finding by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority a violation of the principles of fair trade as a basis for imposing administrative sanctions should be supported by a reference to the specific standard of conduct and be precisely described. It cannot be defined in general terms only. Otherwise, it may be effectively challenged by way of a complaint to an administrative court. On the other hand, in court judgments, in cases referring to the principles of social coexistence (the principles of fair trade), discrepancies in application can be noticed resulting from the specificity of general clauses.","PeriodicalId":34805,"journal":{"name":"Finanse i Prawo Finansowe","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finanse i Prawo Finansowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/2391-6478.1.33.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的:一般条款是法律制度的重要组成部分。它们补充了考虑到社会普遍接受的道德规范的法律法规。它们的普遍性意味着它们既是法律文献中讨论的主题,也是法院判决中评论和引用的主题。由于一般条款的特殊性以及在适用它们的每一种情况下都需要精确地使用它们,因此在某种程度上造成了判决的不可预测性。其中最著名的通则之一是社会共处原则条款。它是在第二次世界大战后随着新的政治体制而出现在波兰法律体系中的。它取代了波兰第二共和国使用的礼貌原则。自1990年以来,这一原则的名称回归波兰法律体系是显而易见的。另一方面,在有关资本市场的法律规定中,使用了公平交易原则条款。可以认为,上述三个条款的性质是相似的。本文的目的是分析这些通用条款的性质和相似性,并特别强调资本市场公平交易原则的条款。研究方法:本研究是理论与实证相结合的。理论部分是基于对文献的回顾。实证部分通过对法院判决的分析来实现。研究结果:结果表明,波兰金融监管局发现违反公平贸易原则作为实施行政制裁的依据,应以具体的行为标准为依据,并加以准确描述。它不能仅仅用一般术语来定义。否则,可以通过向行政法院投诉的方式有效地提出质疑。另一方面,在法院判决中,在涉及社会共存原则(公平贸易原则)的案件中,由于一般条款的特殊性,可以注意到适用上的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zasady uczciwego obrotu w teorii i praktyce
The purpose of the article: General clauses are an important element of the legal system. They supplement the law regulations taking into account moral norms commonly accepted in society. Their general nature means that they are the subject of both discussions in the legal literature and comments and references in court decisions. The specificity of general clauses and the need to precise them in each case in which they are applied, result in a certain unpredictability of judgments. One of the most famous general clauses is the clause of principles of social coexistence. It appeared in the Polish legal system after World War II along with the new political system. It replaced the principle of good manners used in the Second Polish Republic. Since 1990, the return of the name of this principle to the Polish legal system has been visible. On the other hand, in legal regulations relating to the capital market, the clause of the principles of fair trade is used. It can be considered that the nature of the three clauses mentioned above is similar. The aim of the article is to analyze the nature and similarity of these general clauses with particular emphasis on the clause of the principles of fair trade in the capital market. Methodology: The study is theoretical and empirical in nature. The theoretical part was based on a review of the literature. The empirical part is realized by the analysis of the court decisions. Results of the research: The results show that the finding by the Polish Financial Supervision Authority a violation of the principles of fair trade as a basis for imposing administrative sanctions should be supported by a reference to the specific standard of conduct and be precisely described. It cannot be defined in general terms only. Otherwise, it may be effectively challenged by way of a complaint to an administrative court. On the other hand, in court judgments, in cases referring to the principles of social coexistence (the principles of fair trade), discrepancies in application can be noticed resulting from the specificity of general clauses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Governmental Local Investment Fund as a Financial Instrument to Support Urban Investment by the Example of Cities with District Status in the Lodz Voivodeship Civic budget and its role in the process of urban reconstruction - a case study of the city of Lodz Rynek Indywidualnych Kont Emerytalnych w Polsce w kontekście Implementacji Ogólnoeuropejskiego Indywidualnego Produktu Emerytalnego Household Saving in Crisis – Literature Review Postrzeganie inflacji oraz metody ochrony studentów przed jej negatywnymi skutkami
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1