游戏玩家阳刚之气中幻想角色的讨论与防御性混杂性的表现

Q1 Social Sciences The Journal of Men's Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI:10.1177/10608265221084017
Steven L. Dashiell
{"title":"游戏玩家阳刚之气中幻想角色的讨论与防御性混杂性的表现","authors":"Steven L. Dashiell","doi":"10.1177/10608265221084017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper situates gamer discussions of the fantasy race the drow, or dark elves, in masculinity theory. I examine threads from a Facebook group discussing the topic, and code the reactions of men participating. I discuss how some gamer masculinities that are displayed reinforces a belief of epistemic privilege among White men that allows for hegemonic responses to discussions that involve structural racism. I propose larp gamer masculinity as a hybrid masculinity, complicit in its support of hegemonic models but appropriating elements of subordinated populations to allow individuals to feel like an “outsider.” In these gaming discourse spaces, men employ an anti-intellectualized form of digital hooliganism as a rationale for their claims. These men dismiss claims of discrimination as they see those as characteristics outside the scope of the game. The resistance exhibited by these men reacting to changes should be viewed differently than extremist discourses.","PeriodicalId":22686,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Men's Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"25 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussions of Fantasy Characters and Demonstrations of a Defensive Hybridity in Gamer Masculinity\",\"authors\":\"Steven L. Dashiell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10608265221084017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper situates gamer discussions of the fantasy race the drow, or dark elves, in masculinity theory. I examine threads from a Facebook group discussing the topic, and code the reactions of men participating. I discuss how some gamer masculinities that are displayed reinforces a belief of epistemic privilege among White men that allows for hegemonic responses to discussions that involve structural racism. I propose larp gamer masculinity as a hybrid masculinity, complicit in its support of hegemonic models but appropriating elements of subordinated populations to allow individuals to feel like an “outsider.” In these gaming discourse spaces, men employ an anti-intellectualized form of digital hooliganism as a rationale for their claims. These men dismiss claims of discrimination as they see those as characteristics outside the scope of the game. The resistance exhibited by these men reacting to changes should be viewed differently than extremist discourses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Men's Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"25 - 43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Men's Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265221084017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Men's Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265221084017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文将玩家对幻想种族卓尔或黑暗精灵的讨论置于男性气质理论中。我查看了Facebook上一个讨论这个话题的小组的帖子,并记录了参与讨论的男性的反应。我讨论了一些玩家的阳刚之气是如何在白人男性中强化了一种认知特权的信念,这使得他们能够对涉及结构性种族主义的讨论做出霸权反应。我认为大型游戏玩家的阳刚之气是一种混合阳刚之气,它支持霸权模式,但又利用从属群体的元素,让个人感觉自己像个“局外人”。在这些游戏话语空间中,男性使用反智化的数字流氓形式作为他们主张的理由。这些人不理会歧视的说法,因为他们认为这是游戏范围之外的特征。我们应该把这些人对变化所表现出的抵抗与极端主义言论区别看待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discussions of Fantasy Characters and Demonstrations of a Defensive Hybridity in Gamer Masculinity
This paper situates gamer discussions of the fantasy race the drow, or dark elves, in masculinity theory. I examine threads from a Facebook group discussing the topic, and code the reactions of men participating. I discuss how some gamer masculinities that are displayed reinforces a belief of epistemic privilege among White men that allows for hegemonic responses to discussions that involve structural racism. I propose larp gamer masculinity as a hybrid masculinity, complicit in its support of hegemonic models but appropriating elements of subordinated populations to allow individuals to feel like an “outsider.” In these gaming discourse spaces, men employ an anti-intellectualized form of digital hooliganism as a rationale for their claims. These men dismiss claims of discrimination as they see those as characteristics outside the scope of the game. The resistance exhibited by these men reacting to changes should be viewed differently than extremist discourses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Men's Studies
The Journal of Men's Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Male Victims’ Acknowledgement of Sexual Assault and Their Help-Seeking Process. A Qualitative Study Negotiating Non-normative Identities: Gender Nonconforming Malaysian Muslims on Instagram “Show Them Who You Are!”: Ritual Combat and Masculine Identities in Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among Refugee Men: Prevalence and Correlates With Associated Factors The Relationship Between Masculinity and Help-Seeking Among Australian Men Living in Non-urban Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1