民粹主义:左翼和右翼?

P. Biglieri
{"title":"民粹主义:左翼和右翼?","authors":"P. Biglieri","doi":"10.6035/recerca.2020.25.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"El articulo parte de la discusion actual sobre si la proliferacion de los asi denominados populismos de derecha invalida o no la tesis de Laclau de que el populismo es un tipo de articulacion que puede dar un sentido emancipatorio a la iniciativa politica. Dicho debate que se ha presentado fundamentalmente bajo la oposicion binaria populismos de derechas frente a populismos de izquierda tiene a dos voces contrapuestas, las de Fassin y Mouffe, que el texto se propone revisar, desde una perspectiva laclausiana, a partir de dos preguntas que se desprenden de las posiciones politicas de los autores: ?es posible, como desearia Fassin, eludir o eliminar el populismo? ?Es posible distinguir entre un populismo de derechas y uno de izquierdas, como propone Mouffe? The article takes as a point of departure the current discussion about the proliferation of the so called right-wing populisms that put into question Laclau’s thesis that populism is a sort of articulation that may bring about emancipatory directions to politics. This debate, that has recently taken the format of an opposition between right-wing populism vs. leftwing populisms, has two main competing voices —Fassin and Mouffe— that the text reviews from a Laclausian perspective. The two questions addressed, that rise from the political position of each author, are the following: is it possible to eliminate populism as Fassin would prefer? Is it possible to establish a differentiation between right-wing and left-wing populism as Mouffe affirms?","PeriodicalId":42552,"journal":{"name":"Recerca-Revista de Pensament & Analisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Populismo: ¿izquierdas y derechas?\",\"authors\":\"P. Biglieri\",\"doi\":\"10.6035/recerca.2020.25.1.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"El articulo parte de la discusion actual sobre si la proliferacion de los asi denominados populismos de derecha invalida o no la tesis de Laclau de que el populismo es un tipo de articulacion que puede dar un sentido emancipatorio a la iniciativa politica. Dicho debate que se ha presentado fundamentalmente bajo la oposicion binaria populismos de derechas frente a populismos de izquierda tiene a dos voces contrapuestas, las de Fassin y Mouffe, que el texto se propone revisar, desde una perspectiva laclausiana, a partir de dos preguntas que se desprenden de las posiciones politicas de los autores: ?es posible, como desearia Fassin, eludir o eliminar el populismo? ?Es posible distinguir entre un populismo de derechas y uno de izquierdas, como propone Mouffe? The article takes as a point of departure the current discussion about the proliferation of the so called right-wing populisms that put into question Laclau’s thesis that populism is a sort of articulation that may bring about emancipatory directions to politics. This debate, that has recently taken the format of an opposition between right-wing populism vs. leftwing populisms, has two main competing voices —Fassin and Mouffe— that the text reviews from a Laclausian perspective. The two questions addressed, that rise from the political position of each author, are the following: is it possible to eliminate populism as Fassin would prefer? Is it possible to establish a differentiation between right-wing and left-wing populism as Mouffe affirms?\",\"PeriodicalId\":42552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recerca-Revista de Pensament & Analisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recerca-Revista de Pensament & Analisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.2020.25.1.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recerca-Revista de Pensament & Analisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6035/recerca.2020.25.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,拉克劳提出了一种方法,通过这种方法,政治主动性可以被赋予一种解放的感觉,这种感觉可以被理解为政治主动性的一种表达。基本上已经提交讨论二进制oposicion下运动的右翼面对左翼运动有两个声音争、Fassin和Mouffe拟修订文本,从一个角度laclausiana从发出的两个问题,作者:政策立场?这是有可能的,就像我希望我Fassin、避免或消除民粹主义?有可能像Mouffe建议的那样区分右翼民粹主义和左翼民粹主义吗?本文以当前关于所谓右翼民粹主义扩散的讨论为出发点,对拉克劳的论文提出了质疑,即民粹主义是一种可以为政治带来解放方向的表达方式。这一争论最近采取了右翼民粹主义与左翼民粹主义对立的形式,有两个主要的竞争声音——法辛和穆夫——从拉克劳斯的角度对文本进行了修订。从每个作者的政治立场来看,这两个问题是:是否有可能消除民粹主义,就像Fassin想要的那样?是否有可能像Mouffe所说的那样区分右翼民粹主义和左翼民粹主义?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Populismo: ¿izquierdas y derechas?
El articulo parte de la discusion actual sobre si la proliferacion de los asi denominados populismos de derecha invalida o no la tesis de Laclau de que el populismo es un tipo de articulacion que puede dar un sentido emancipatorio a la iniciativa politica. Dicho debate que se ha presentado fundamentalmente bajo la oposicion binaria populismos de derechas frente a populismos de izquierda tiene a dos voces contrapuestas, las de Fassin y Mouffe, que el texto se propone revisar, desde una perspectiva laclausiana, a partir de dos preguntas que se desprenden de las posiciones politicas de los autores: ?es posible, como desearia Fassin, eludir o eliminar el populismo? ?Es posible distinguir entre un populismo de derechas y uno de izquierdas, como propone Mouffe? The article takes as a point of departure the current discussion about the proliferation of the so called right-wing populisms that put into question Laclau’s thesis that populism is a sort of articulation that may bring about emancipatory directions to politics. This debate, that has recently taken the format of an opposition between right-wing populism vs. leftwing populisms, has two main competing voices —Fassin and Mouffe— that the text reviews from a Laclausian perspective. The two questions addressed, that rise from the political position of each author, are the following: is it possible to eliminate populism as Fassin would prefer? Is it possible to establish a differentiation between right-wing and left-wing populism as Mouffe affirms?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
32 weeks
期刊最新文献
Portada y contraportada La justificación de las condiciones de trabajo y demandas laborales en España: órdenes de valor La empresa, la deuda y el reto Impulsando el emprendimiento en oficinas bancarias: dispositivos utilizados a nivel de entidades financieras Monogamia, pandemia y disidencia relacional: notas desde Brasil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1