{"title":"数据所有权和开放科学","authors":"M. J. Tonelli, Felipe Zambaldi","doi":"10.1590/s0034-759020190601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of providing open access to articles, adopted in Brazil and several other countries, still faces resistance from many commercial publishers abroad (Packer & Santos, 2019a). Recently, some of them have switched to a hybrid model (open and closed access) as a more balanced path. Transparency in the peer review process is also being discussed: The digital library SciELO recommends a “gradual increase of transparency and openness [...] with the disclosure of the identities of authors and reviewers during the evaluation process” (Packer & Santos, 2019b). Even more controversial is the policy of open access to research data of articles published in scientific publications. The Blog SciELO em Perspectiva has several texts discussing this trend, which have been questioned by many actors involved in the production and publication of scientific articles, including authors, universities, editors, and publishers.","PeriodicalId":46558,"journal":{"name":"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas","volume":"102 1","pages":"372-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROPRIEDADE DOS DADOS E CIÊNCIA ABERTA\",\"authors\":\"M. J. Tonelli, Felipe Zambaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/s0034-759020190601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The practice of providing open access to articles, adopted in Brazil and several other countries, still faces resistance from many commercial publishers abroad (Packer & Santos, 2019a). Recently, some of them have switched to a hybrid model (open and closed access) as a more balanced path. Transparency in the peer review process is also being discussed: The digital library SciELO recommends a “gradual increase of transparency and openness [...] with the disclosure of the identities of authors and reviewers during the evaluation process” (Packer & Santos, 2019b). Even more controversial is the policy of open access to research data of articles published in scientific publications. The Blog SciELO em Perspectiva has several texts discussing this trend, which have been questioned by many actors involved in the production and publication of scientific articles, including authors, universities, editors, and publishers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"372-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190601\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rae-Revista De Administracao De Empresas","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020190601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在巴西和其他几个国家采用的开放获取文章的做法仍然面临来自国外许多商业出版商的抵制(Packer & Santos, 2019a)。最近,他们中的一些人已经转向混合模式(开放和封闭访问)作为更平衡的路径。同行评议过程的透明度也在讨论之中:数字图书馆SciELO建议“逐步增加透明度和公开性……在评估过程中披露了作者和审稿人的身份”(Packer & Santos, 2019b)。更有争议的是开放获取发表在科学出版物上的研究数据的政策。博客SciELO em Perspectiva有几篇文章讨论了这一趋势,但许多参与科学文章制作和出版的参与者,包括作者、大学、编辑和出版商,都对这一趋势提出了质疑。
The practice of providing open access to articles, adopted in Brazil and several other countries, still faces resistance from many commercial publishers abroad (Packer & Santos, 2019a). Recently, some of them have switched to a hybrid model (open and closed access) as a more balanced path. Transparency in the peer review process is also being discussed: The digital library SciELO recommends a “gradual increase of transparency and openness [...] with the disclosure of the identities of authors and reviewers during the evaluation process” (Packer & Santos, 2019b). Even more controversial is the policy of open access to research data of articles published in scientific publications. The Blog SciELO em Perspectiva has several texts discussing this trend, which have been questioned by many actors involved in the production and publication of scientific articles, including authors, universities, editors, and publishers.