酬金和个人关系对警察使用自由裁量权的影响

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Policing & Society Pub Date : 1999-04-01 DOI:10.1080/10439463.1999.9964811
S. Macintyre, T. Prenzler
{"title":"酬金和个人关系对警察使用自由裁量权的影响","authors":"S. Macintyre, T. Prenzler","doi":"10.1080/10439463.1999.9964811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a survey of police officers in Queensland, Australia, regarding their responses to a scenario in which an officer is confronted with a traffic violation by a cafe proprietor who has given the officer free food and drinks. The majority of respondents supported the option of not giving the driver a traffic offence notice and related their choice to the influence of the personal relationship with the offender. This preference is contrary to official policy and public opinion. The survey was conducted following a period of ethical reform of the agency and demonstrates the need for intensified ethics training, closer supervision of operational police and clearer guidelines for the exercise of discretion.","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of gratuities and personal relationships on police use of discretion\",\"authors\":\"S. Macintyre, T. Prenzler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.1999.9964811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports on a survey of police officers in Queensland, Australia, regarding their responses to a scenario in which an officer is confronted with a traffic violation by a cafe proprietor who has given the officer free food and drinks. The majority of respondents supported the option of not giving the driver a traffic offence notice and related their choice to the influence of the personal relationship with the offender. This preference is contrary to official policy and public opinion. The survey was conducted following a period of ethical reform of the agency and demonstrates the need for intensified ethics training, closer supervision of operational police and clearer guidelines for the exercise of discretion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1999.9964811\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1999.9964811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

这篇论文报道了一项对澳大利亚昆士兰警察的调查,关于他们对一个场景的反应,在这个场景中,一名警察面对一名违反交通规则的咖啡馆老板,他给了警察免费的食物和饮料。大多数答复者支持不向司机发出交通违例通知的选择,并将他们的选择与与违例者的个人关系的影响联系起来。这种偏好与官方政策和公众舆论背道而驰。这项调查是在该机构进行了一段时间的道德改革之后进行的,它表明有必要加强道德培训,更密切地监督警务行动,并更明确地指导自由裁量权的行使。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of gratuities and personal relationships on police use of discretion
This paper reports on a survey of police officers in Queensland, Australia, regarding their responses to a scenario in which an officer is confronted with a traffic violation by a cafe proprietor who has given the officer free food and drinks. The majority of respondents supported the option of not giving the driver a traffic offence notice and related their choice to the influence of the personal relationship with the offender. This preference is contrary to official policy and public opinion. The survey was conducted following a period of ethical reform of the agency and demonstrates the need for intensified ethics training, closer supervision of operational police and clearer guidelines for the exercise of discretion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
期刊最新文献
Police and protest in the digital age – a post-Soviet comparison of citizen-police relations ‘Strands in a cable’: effective investigator decision-making using forensic identification evidence in volume crime investigations Can dialogue help police officers and young Black adults understand each other? Key findings from a restorative process Public support for empowering police during the COVID-19 crisis: evidence from London Youth’s contacts with private security guards: compulsive and assistive encounters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1