在缺铁性贫血患者中使用Monofer作为俄罗斯联邦卫生保健系统中国家保障方案下提供医疗服务的一部分的药物经济学分析

R. Yagudina, A. Kulikov, V. Serpik, O. Gromova, I. Torshin
{"title":"在缺铁性贫血患者中使用Monofer作为俄罗斯联邦卫生保健系统中国家保障方案下提供医疗服务的一部分的药物经济学分析","authors":"R. Yagudina, A. Kulikov, V. Serpik, O. Gromova, I. Torshin","doi":"10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of iron preparations for intravenous infusion in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) within the concept of patient blood management program.Material and methods. A retrospective pharmacoeconomic study was carried out using methods of analysis of efficiency, costs and costeffectiveness. Comparison of preparations of oligoisomaltose iron [III] (Monofer) and carboxymaltose iron [III] (Ferinject®) was carried out.Results. In general, Monofer and Ferinject® are characterized by comparable efficacy in terms of hematological response. Using a dosiological model of an increase in hemoglobin blood levels over time in treatment with the drugs under consideration the frequencies of the hematological response were calculated (Monofer – 79%, Ferinject® – 70%). The cost of treating one patient with an average body weight of 88.3 kg and an initial hemoglobin level of 100 g/l was 13,097 rubles for Monofer and 15,681 rubles for Ferinject®. The values of the cost-effectiveness indicator calculated in accordance with the criterion of the effectiveness of the hematological response amounted to 16,578 rubles (Monofer) and 22,402 rubles (Ferinject®), which allows to consider Monofer as strictly preferred. With the colorectal surgery as an example, it has been shown that the use of this drug in patients blood management can reduce the total cost of treatment (in particular, by reducing the required number of portions of red blood cells).Conclusion. The wider use of iron preparations for intravenous infusion in IDA has reasonable economic advantages. The preparation of oligoisomaltose iron Monofer is strictly preferred in relation to the preparation of carboxymaltose iron. ","PeriodicalId":36464,"journal":{"name":"Farmakoekonomika","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacoeconomic analysis of using Monofer in patients with iron deficiency anemia as part of the provision of medical care under the state guarantees program in the health care system of the Russian Federation\",\"authors\":\"R. Yagudina, A. Kulikov, V. Serpik, O. Gromova, I. Torshin\",\"doi\":\"10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of iron preparations for intravenous infusion in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) within the concept of patient blood management program.Material and methods. A retrospective pharmacoeconomic study was carried out using methods of analysis of efficiency, costs and costeffectiveness. Comparison of preparations of oligoisomaltose iron [III] (Monofer) and carboxymaltose iron [III] (Ferinject®) was carried out.Results. In general, Monofer and Ferinject® are characterized by comparable efficacy in terms of hematological response. Using a dosiological model of an increase in hemoglobin blood levels over time in treatment with the drugs under consideration the frequencies of the hematological response were calculated (Monofer – 79%, Ferinject® – 70%). The cost of treating one patient with an average body weight of 88.3 kg and an initial hemoglobin level of 100 g/l was 13,097 rubles for Monofer and 15,681 rubles for Ferinject®. The values of the cost-effectiveness indicator calculated in accordance with the criterion of the effectiveness of the hematological response amounted to 16,578 rubles (Monofer) and 22,402 rubles (Ferinject®), which allows to consider Monofer as strictly preferred. With the colorectal surgery as an example, it has been shown that the use of this drug in patients blood management can reduce the total cost of treatment (in particular, by reducing the required number of portions of red blood cells).Conclusion. The wider use of iron preparations for intravenous infusion in IDA has reasonable economic advantages. The preparation of oligoisomaltose iron Monofer is strictly preferred in relation to the preparation of carboxymaltose iron. \",\"PeriodicalId\":36464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmakoekonomika\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmakoekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmakoekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:在患者血液管理方案的概念下,对静脉输注铁制剂治疗缺铁性贫血(IDA)进行比较药物经济学分析。材料和方法。采用效率、成本和成本效益分析方法进行回顾性药物经济学研究。对低聚异麦芽糖铁[III] (Monofer)和羧麦芽糖铁[III] (Ferinject®)的制备方法进行了比较。一般而言,Monofer和Ferinject®在血液学反应方面具有相当的疗效。使用考虑的药物治疗期间血红蛋白水平随时间增加的剂量学模型,计算血液学反应的频率(Monofer - 79%, Ferinject®- 70%)。治疗一名平均体重为88.3公斤、初始血红蛋白水平为100克/升的患者,Monofer的费用为13097卢布,Ferinject®的费用为15681卢布。根据血液学反应有效性标准计算的成本效益指标值为16,578卢布(Monofer)和22,402卢布(Ferinject®),这允许将Monofer视为严格首选。以结直肠手术为例,已经证明在患者血液管理中使用这种药物可以降低治疗的总成本(特别是通过减少所需的红细胞数量)。在IDA中广泛使用静脉输注铁制剂具有合理的经济优势。相对于羧基麦芽糖铁的制备,本发明严格优选低聚异麦芽糖铁的制备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of using Monofer in patients with iron deficiency anemia as part of the provision of medical care under the state guarantees program in the health care system of the Russian Federation
Objective: comparative pharmacoeconomic analysis of iron preparations for intravenous infusion in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) within the concept of patient blood management program.Material and methods. A retrospective pharmacoeconomic study was carried out using methods of analysis of efficiency, costs and costeffectiveness. Comparison of preparations of oligoisomaltose iron [III] (Monofer) and carboxymaltose iron [III] (Ferinject®) was carried out.Results. In general, Monofer and Ferinject® are characterized by comparable efficacy in terms of hematological response. Using a dosiological model of an increase in hemoglobin blood levels over time in treatment with the drugs under consideration the frequencies of the hematological response were calculated (Monofer – 79%, Ferinject® – 70%). The cost of treating one patient with an average body weight of 88.3 kg and an initial hemoglobin level of 100 g/l was 13,097 rubles for Monofer and 15,681 rubles for Ferinject®. The values of the cost-effectiveness indicator calculated in accordance with the criterion of the effectiveness of the hematological response amounted to 16,578 rubles (Monofer) and 22,402 rubles (Ferinject®), which allows to consider Monofer as strictly preferred. With the colorectal surgery as an example, it has been shown that the use of this drug in patients blood management can reduce the total cost of treatment (in particular, by reducing the required number of portions of red blood cells).Conclusion. The wider use of iron preparations for intravenous infusion in IDA has reasonable economic advantages. The preparation of oligoisomaltose iron Monofer is strictly preferred in relation to the preparation of carboxymaltose iron. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Farmakoekonomika
Farmakoekonomika Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Updated pharmacoeconomic analysis of atesolizumab efficiency compared with other PD-1 inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer after chemotherapy Efficacy of alectinib in comparison with lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: pharmacoeconomic study Retrospective pharmacoeconomic study of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia The role of ferritin in liver disease assessment An open-label, controlled trial of the clinical effects of Laennec® in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis or cirrhosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1