在商业救助中,债权人的利益仍然占上风:斯瓦特诉Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd 2011(5) SA 422 (GNP)

Q4 Social Sciences International Journal of Private Law Pub Date : 2014-02-04 DOI:10.1504/IJPL.2014.059075
Edith Mbiriri
{"title":"在商业救助中,债权人的利益仍然占上风:斯瓦特诉Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd 2011(5) SA 422 (GNP)","authors":"Edith Mbiriri","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2014.059075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Companies Act 71 of 2008 introduced a new business rescue regime into South African corporate law. Business rescue is a procedure that facilitates the rehabilitation of a financially distressed company. The business rescue regime is debtor-friendly and replaced the judicial management which was creditor-friendly and which proved to have been inadequate and ineffective in rescuing companies experiencing financial difficulties. The case of Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd is significant as it was the first case dealing with the business rescue provisions. The court had to consider the requirements for commencing business rescue and looked to the judicial management provisions for assistance. The study focuses on the decision of the court and its reliance on judicial management despite the two regimes having different emphasis in terms of the interests of the stakeholders and the requirements for commencing the business rescue procedure as set out in the Companies Act.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"33 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creditors’ interests still carry the day in business rescue: Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd 2011(5) SA 422 (GNP)\",\"authors\":\"Edith Mbiriri\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2014.059075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Companies Act 71 of 2008 introduced a new business rescue regime into South African corporate law. Business rescue is a procedure that facilitates the rehabilitation of a financially distressed company. The business rescue regime is debtor-friendly and replaced the judicial management which was creditor-friendly and which proved to have been inadequate and ineffective in rescuing companies experiencing financial difficulties. The case of Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd is significant as it was the first case dealing with the business rescue provisions. The court had to consider the requirements for commencing business rescue and looked to the judicial management provisions for assistance. The study focuses on the decision of the court and its reliance on judicial management despite the two regimes having different emphasis in terms of the interests of the stakeholders and the requirements for commencing the business rescue procedure as set out in the Companies Act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.059075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2014.059075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2008年颁布的第71号公司法在南非公司法中引入了一项新的商业救助制度。企业救助是一种帮助陷入财务困境的公司恢复元气的程序。企业救助制度是对债务人友好的,取代了对债权人友好的司法管理制度,而司法管理制度在救助遇到财务困难的公司方面证明是不充分和无效的。Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd的案例意义重大,因为它是处理商业救助条款的第一个案例。法院必须考虑开始企业救助的要求,并寻求司法管理规定的协助。该研究侧重于法院的决定及其对司法管理的依赖,尽管两种制度在利益相关者的利益和《公司法》中规定的启动商业救助程序的要求方面有不同的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creditors’ interests still carry the day in business rescue: Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd 2011(5) SA 422 (GNP)
The Companies Act 71 of 2008 introduced a new business rescue regime into South African corporate law. Business rescue is a procedure that facilitates the rehabilitation of a financially distressed company. The business rescue regime is debtor-friendly and replaced the judicial management which was creditor-friendly and which proved to have been inadequate and ineffective in rescuing companies experiencing financial difficulties. The case of Swart v Beagles Run Investments 25 (Pty) Ltd is significant as it was the first case dealing with the business rescue provisions. The court had to consider the requirements for commencing business rescue and looked to the judicial management provisions for assistance. The study focuses on the decision of the court and its reliance on judicial management despite the two regimes having different emphasis in terms of the interests of the stakeholders and the requirements for commencing the business rescue procedure as set out in the Companies Act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
The evolution of the non-oral modification clause Legal regulation of migration policy in EU countries: current challenges The application of the concept of consideration to smart contracts on a blockchain. The propriety of mandatory arbitration in Nigeria vis-à-vis the doctrine of voluntariness: the imperativeness of charting a new course The evolution of the non-oral modification clause
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1