经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的疗效和安全性

Mostafa F. Tantawy
{"title":"经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折的疗效和安全性","authors":"Mostafa F. Tantawy","doi":"10.1177/22104917221082310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures constitute a major concern in elderly population who may not tolerate conservative treatment. Although percutaneous vertebroplasty is an alternative minimally invasive procedure that is commonly used nowadays, there is still debate about its efficacy. The study aim is to provide short term experience about efficacy of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods Thirty five patients were treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty (the intervention group). The visual analog scale before the intervention (pre VAS), one week after the intervention (post VAS 1), at three months (post VAS 2) after the intervention were compared at each time point with the control group (35 patients). The oswestry disability index before (pre ODI) and three months after the procedure (post ODI) were assessed. The control group received the optimal medical treatment and a regular physiotherapy program for three months. Results Both conservative and vertebroplasty group showed significant improvement in the VAS/ODI with time. With vertebroplasty, the improvement is faster and statistically significant compared with conservative group. There were statistically significant differences between both groups concerning post VAS 1, post VAS 2 and post ODI as the P values were 0.00 in all relationships. Conclusion Patients with osteoporotic compression fractures who were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty experienced considerable clinical improvement in comparison with those who received the conservative management.","PeriodicalId":42408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa F. Tantawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/22104917221082310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures constitute a major concern in elderly population who may not tolerate conservative treatment. Although percutaneous vertebroplasty is an alternative minimally invasive procedure that is commonly used nowadays, there is still debate about its efficacy. The study aim is to provide short term experience about efficacy of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods Thirty five patients were treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty (the intervention group). The visual analog scale before the intervention (pre VAS), one week after the intervention (post VAS 1), at three months (post VAS 2) after the intervention were compared at each time point with the control group (35 patients). The oswestry disability index before (pre ODI) and three months after the procedure (post ODI) were assessed. The control group received the optimal medical treatment and a regular physiotherapy program for three months. Results Both conservative and vertebroplasty group showed significant improvement in the VAS/ODI with time. With vertebroplasty, the improvement is faster and statistically significant compared with conservative group. There were statistically significant differences between both groups concerning post VAS 1, post VAS 2 and post ODI as the P values were 0.00 in all relationships. Conclusion Patients with osteoporotic compression fractures who were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty experienced considerable clinical improvement in comparison with those who received the conservative management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917221082310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917221082310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折是不能耐受保守治疗的老年人的主要问题。虽然经皮椎体成形术是目前常用的一种微创手术,但其疗效仍存在争议。本研究旨在为骨质疏松性椎体骨折椎体成形术的短期疗效提供经验。方法采用经皮椎体成形术治疗35例患者(干预组)。将干预前(VAS前)、干预后1周(VAS后1期)、干预后3个月(VAS后2期)各时间点的视觉模拟量表与对照组(35例)进行比较。评估手术前(ODI前)和手术后3个月(ODI后)的嗅觉功能障碍指数。对照组采用最佳药物治疗和常规物理治疗方案,疗程为3个月。结果保守组和椎体成形术组VAS/ODI随时间的延长均有显著改善。与保守组相比,椎体成形术改善更快,且有统计学意义。两组在VAS 1后、VAS 2后和ODI后的评分差异均有统计学意义,所有关系的P值均为0.00。结论经皮椎体成形术治疗骨质疏松性压缩性骨折患者的临床疗效明显优于保守治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures
Background Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures constitute a major concern in elderly population who may not tolerate conservative treatment. Although percutaneous vertebroplasty is an alternative minimally invasive procedure that is commonly used nowadays, there is still debate about its efficacy. The study aim is to provide short term experience about efficacy of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods Thirty five patients were treated by percutaneous vertebroplasty (the intervention group). The visual analog scale before the intervention (pre VAS), one week after the intervention (post VAS 1), at three months (post VAS 2) after the intervention were compared at each time point with the control group (35 patients). The oswestry disability index before (pre ODI) and three months after the procedure (post ODI) were assessed. The control group received the optimal medical treatment and a regular physiotherapy program for three months. Results Both conservative and vertebroplasty group showed significant improvement in the VAS/ODI with time. With vertebroplasty, the improvement is faster and statistically significant compared with conservative group. There were statistically significant differences between both groups concerning post VAS 1, post VAS 2 and post ODI as the P values were 0.00 in all relationships. Conclusion Patients with osteoporotic compression fractures who were treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty experienced considerable clinical improvement in comparison with those who received the conservative management.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Ultrasonic measurement for the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome: A study in the Hong Kong Chinese population The surgical outcome of postoperative radial neck nonunion: Retrospective case series with systematic review Tip-to-apex distance does not predict fixation failure regardless of reduction quality in intra-capsular neck of femur fractures treated with femoral neck system Real world patient-reported and health care professional-perceived pain severity in outpatient fracture clinic procedures Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on sports and arthroscopic surgery in local hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1