自体骨移植与聚醚酮笼在颈前路椎间盘切除术和融合手术中的效果

M. Malik, Shehzad Safdar, Zubair Ahmed Khan, Amir Aziz, Rizwan Masood Butt, Muhammad Naveed Majeed
{"title":"自体骨移植与聚醚酮笼在颈前路椎间盘切除术和融合手术中的效果","authors":"M. Malik, Shehzad Safdar, Zubair Ahmed Khan, Amir Aziz, Rizwan Masood Butt, Muhammad Naveed Majeed","doi":"10.36552/pjns.v26i3.678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective:To compare the outcome of autologous bone graft versus PEEK cages in ACDF surgery in terms of clinical performance and radiographic features. \nMethodology:This study was conducted at Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan from April 2020 to December 2022. In this study patients were randomized into two equal groups i.e. Group A (autologous bone graft)  and Group B (PEEK cage). \nResults: Total of 98 patients was included in the study. The mean age of cases was 49.88 ± 17.83 years. There were 58(59.18%) male and 40(40.82%) female cases. 25(25.51%) cases who had C3-C4 involved, 48(48.98%) patients had C5-C6 and 25(25.51%) cases had C5 region involved. The mean disc height at 6th months in PEEK group was 6.71 ± 0.46 mm and in bone graft group was 6.33 ± 0.47 mm, p-value < 0.05. The mean operative time in PEEK group (2.07 ± 0.42) was statistically less than bone graft group (3.23 ± 0.36), p-value < 0.05. The average blood loss was also statistically less in PEEK group as compared to bone graft.  The mean hospital stay in PEEK group was 2.92 ± 0.61 days as compared to bone graft was 5.48 ± 1.90 days, p-value < 0.05. \nConclusion:Outcome of ACDF surgery PEEK cages are better than autologous bone graft in terms of clinical performance and radiological features. Hence PEEK cages can be opted in future to have better outcome and higher patient’s satisfaction. \n ","PeriodicalId":19963,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of autologous bone graft versus polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery\",\"authors\":\"M. Malik, Shehzad Safdar, Zubair Ahmed Khan, Amir Aziz, Rizwan Masood Butt, Muhammad Naveed Majeed\",\"doi\":\"10.36552/pjns.v26i3.678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective:To compare the outcome of autologous bone graft versus PEEK cages in ACDF surgery in terms of clinical performance and radiographic features. \\nMethodology:This study was conducted at Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan from April 2020 to December 2022. In this study patients were randomized into two equal groups i.e. Group A (autologous bone graft)  and Group B (PEEK cage). \\nResults: Total of 98 patients was included in the study. The mean age of cases was 49.88 ± 17.83 years. There were 58(59.18%) male and 40(40.82%) female cases. 25(25.51%) cases who had C3-C4 involved, 48(48.98%) patients had C5-C6 and 25(25.51%) cases had C5 region involved. The mean disc height at 6th months in PEEK group was 6.71 ± 0.46 mm and in bone graft group was 6.33 ± 0.47 mm, p-value < 0.05. The mean operative time in PEEK group (2.07 ± 0.42) was statistically less than bone graft group (3.23 ± 0.36), p-value < 0.05. The average blood loss was also statistically less in PEEK group as compared to bone graft.  The mean hospital stay in PEEK group was 2.92 ± 0.61 days as compared to bone graft was 5.48 ± 1.90 days, p-value < 0.05. \\nConclusion:Outcome of ACDF surgery PEEK cages are better than autologous bone graft in terms of clinical performance and radiological features. Hence PEEK cages can be opted in future to have better outcome and higher patient’s satisfaction. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":19963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i3.678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i3.678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较自体骨移植与PEEK笼在ACDF手术中的临床表现和影像学表现。方法:本研究于2020年4月至2022年12月在巴基斯坦拉合尔旁遮普省神经科学研究所神经外科进行。本研究将患者随机分为两组,即A组(自体骨移植)和B组(PEEK笼)。结果:共纳入98例患者。患者平均年龄49.88±17.83岁。男性58例(59.18%),女性40例(40.82%)。C3-C4受累25例(25.51%),C5- c6受累48例(48.98%),C5受累25例(25.51%)。PEEK组6个月椎间盘平均高度为6.71±0.46 mm,植骨组6个月椎间盘平均高度为6.33±0.47 mm, p值< 0.05。PEEK组平均手术时间(2.07±0.42)少于植骨组(3.23±0.36),p值< 0.05。与骨移植相比,PEEK组的平均失血量在统计学上也更少。PEEK组平均住院时间为2.92±0.61 d,骨移植组平均住院时间为5.48±1.90 d, p值< 0.05。结论:ACDF手术PEEK笼的临床表现和影像学表现均优于自体骨移植。因此,未来可以选择PEEK笼,以获得更好的结果和更高的患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome of autologous bone graft versus polyetheretherketone cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery
Objective:To compare the outcome of autologous bone graft versus PEEK cages in ACDF surgery in terms of clinical performance and radiographic features. Methodology:This study was conducted at Department of Neurosurgery, Punjab Institute of Neurosciences, Lahore, Pakistan from April 2020 to December 2022. In this study patients were randomized into two equal groups i.e. Group A (autologous bone graft)  and Group B (PEEK cage). Results: Total of 98 patients was included in the study. The mean age of cases was 49.88 ± 17.83 years. There were 58(59.18%) male and 40(40.82%) female cases. 25(25.51%) cases who had C3-C4 involved, 48(48.98%) patients had C5-C6 and 25(25.51%) cases had C5 region involved. The mean disc height at 6th months in PEEK group was 6.71 ± 0.46 mm and in bone graft group was 6.33 ± 0.47 mm, p-value < 0.05. The mean operative time in PEEK group (2.07 ± 0.42) was statistically less than bone graft group (3.23 ± 0.36), p-value < 0.05. The average blood loss was also statistically less in PEEK group as compared to bone graft.  The mean hospital stay in PEEK group was 2.92 ± 0.61 days as compared to bone graft was 5.48 ± 1.90 days, p-value < 0.05. Conclusion:Outcome of ACDF surgery PEEK cages are better than autologous bone graft in terms of clinical performance and radiological features. Hence PEEK cages can be opted in future to have better outcome and higher patient’s satisfaction.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Computational biomarkers for the decision of neurosurgical treatment for brain tumors Outcomes of Management of Pituitary Adenoma by Use of Octreotide Injections Preoperatively Metallic Foreign Body in the Neck – a Rare Incidence Comparison of the Efficacy of Fusion with Non-Fusion Treatment for Recurrent Lumber Disc Herniation (RLDH) Impact of Intracranial Pressure-Monitored Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1