JUCAMA学习模式的实验回顾了学生在Prodi PBSI IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro的学习成绩

Agus Darmuki, Ahmad Hariyadi
{"title":"JUCAMA学习模式的实验回顾了学生在Prodi PBSI IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro的学习成绩","authors":"Agus Darmuki, Ahmad Hariyadi","doi":"10.24176/kredo.v3i1.4021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focus this is research to determine which are the achievements of better speaking learning: (1), learning model JUCAMA or Conventional, (2) Visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) On models learning JUCAMA,  which are the achievements of better speaking learning, visual, auditory, or kinesthetic.This type of research is quasi-experimental with 2 × 3 factorial design. The population of this research is all students of PBSI IKSI PGRI Bojonegoro Study Program, which consists of nine classes with a total of 288 students. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling, selected three classes, namely the level of I-A, IB, and IC. The sample consisted of 93 students, with details of 31 IA students as an experiment, 31 IB level students as a control, and 31 IC level students as a trial. Data collection instruments using learning style questionnaires, and learning achievement tests that have been validated by the validators. The test instrument was tested in PBSI level I study program after being tested and then analyzed its reliability, distinguishing features and difficulty levels. The prerequisite tests include the normality test using the Lilliefors method and the variance homogeneity test using the Bartlett method. With α = 0.05, it can be concluded that the sample comes from populations that are normally distributed and have a homogeneous variance.In this study it can be concluded that: (1) students with learning JUCAMA had speaking learning achievement better than the students with conventional learning, (2) achievement of learning speaking students who have a visual learning style is better than the speaking learning achievement of students who have auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. While the speaking achievement students who have learning styles of auditory as well as students who have a kinesthetic learning style, (3) On learning JUCAMA, there is no difference between speaking achievement in each learning style. Keyword: jucama, learning style, learning achievement, speaking","PeriodicalId":34413,"journal":{"name":"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran JUCAMA Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Berbicara di Prodi PBSI IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro\",\"authors\":\"Agus Darmuki, Ahmad Hariyadi\",\"doi\":\"10.24176/kredo.v3i1.4021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Focus this is research to determine which are the achievements of better speaking learning: (1), learning model JUCAMA or Conventional, (2) Visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) On models learning JUCAMA,  which are the achievements of better speaking learning, visual, auditory, or kinesthetic.This type of research is quasi-experimental with 2 × 3 factorial design. The population of this research is all students of PBSI IKSI PGRI Bojonegoro Study Program, which consists of nine classes with a total of 288 students. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling, selected three classes, namely the level of I-A, IB, and IC. The sample consisted of 93 students, with details of 31 IA students as an experiment, 31 IB level students as a control, and 31 IC level students as a trial. Data collection instruments using learning style questionnaires, and learning achievement tests that have been validated by the validators. The test instrument was tested in PBSI level I study program after being tested and then analyzed its reliability, distinguishing features and difficulty levels. The prerequisite tests include the normality test using the Lilliefors method and the variance homogeneity test using the Bartlett method. With α = 0.05, it can be concluded that the sample comes from populations that are normally distributed and have a homogeneous variance.In this study it can be concluded that: (1) students with learning JUCAMA had speaking learning achievement better than the students with conventional learning, (2) achievement of learning speaking students who have a visual learning style is better than the speaking learning achievement of students who have auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. While the speaking achievement students who have learning styles of auditory as well as students who have a kinesthetic learning style, (3) On learning JUCAMA, there is no difference between speaking achievement in each learning style. Keyword: jucama, learning style, learning achievement, speaking\",\"PeriodicalId\":34413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v3i1.4021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kredo Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v3i1.4021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

重点是研究哪些是更好的口语学习的成就:(1),学习模式JUCAMA或Conventional,(2)视觉,听觉或动觉,(3)学习模式JUCAMA,这是更好的口语学习的成就,视觉,听觉或动觉。这类研究采用2 × 3因子设计的准实验。本研究的研究对象为PBSI IKSI PGRI Bojonegoro Study Program的所有学生,该项目由9个班级组成,共有288名学生。抽样采用整群随机抽样,选取I-A水平、IB水平和IC水平三个班级,共93名学生,其中IA水平31名学生作为实验,IB水平31名学生作为对照,IC水平31名学生作为试验。数据收集工具使用学习风格问卷和学习成就测试,已被验证者验证。该测试仪经测试后,在PBSI一级学习程序中进行了测试,并对其信度、特征和难度进行了分析。前提检验包括使用Lilliefors方法的正态性检验和使用Bartlett方法的方差齐性检验。当α = 0.05时,可以得出结论,样本来自正态分布的总体,具有均匀的方差。本研究结果表明:(1)学习juama的学生口语学习成绩优于常规学习的学生;(2)视觉学习风格的口语学习成绩优于听觉和动觉学习风格的学生口语学习成绩。(3)在学习juama时,不同学习风格的学生的口语成绩没有差异。关键词:珠蚌,学习方式,学习成果,口语
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran JUCAMA Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Berbicara di Prodi PBSI IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro
Focus this is research to determine which are the achievements of better speaking learning: (1), learning model JUCAMA or Conventional, (2) Visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) On models learning JUCAMA,  which are the achievements of better speaking learning, visual, auditory, or kinesthetic.This type of research is quasi-experimental with 2 × 3 factorial design. The population of this research is all students of PBSI IKSI PGRI Bojonegoro Study Program, which consists of nine classes with a total of 288 students. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling, selected three classes, namely the level of I-A, IB, and IC. The sample consisted of 93 students, with details of 31 IA students as an experiment, 31 IB level students as a control, and 31 IC level students as a trial. Data collection instruments using learning style questionnaires, and learning achievement tests that have been validated by the validators. The test instrument was tested in PBSI level I study program after being tested and then analyzed its reliability, distinguishing features and difficulty levels. The prerequisite tests include the normality test using the Lilliefors method and the variance homogeneity test using the Bartlett method. With α = 0.05, it can be concluded that the sample comes from populations that are normally distributed and have a homogeneous variance.In this study it can be concluded that: (1) students with learning JUCAMA had speaking learning achievement better than the students with conventional learning, (2) achievement of learning speaking students who have a visual learning style is better than the speaking learning achievement of students who have auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. While the speaking achievement students who have learning styles of auditory as well as students who have a kinesthetic learning style, (3) On learning JUCAMA, there is no difference between speaking achievement in each learning style. Keyword: jucama, learning style, learning achievement, speaking
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
ANALISIS PERISTIWA CAMPUR KODE DALAM PERCAKAPAN DI PASAR KAGET KUBANG JAYA KABUPATEN KAMPAR ANALISIS ANTROPOLOGI SASTRA DALAM NOVEL TELEGRAM TITIK HABIS KARYA FATHULLAH WAJDI RANCANG BANGUN GAME EDUKATIF BAHASA INDONESIA BAGI PENUTUR ARAB TINGKAT PEMULA BERBASIS WEBSITE SAYA PASTI BISA: ANALISIS TINDAK TUTUR DALAM VIDEO MOTIVASI MARRY RIANA EKRANISASI NOVEL “KKN DI DESA PENARI” KARYA SIMPLEMAN KE BENTUK FILM KARYA SUTRADARA AWI SURYADI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1