宫廷舞蹈:对成熟的非营利组织的研究中的反身性和声誉敏感性

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIOLOGY South African Review of Sociology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1080/21528586.2022.2068158
Erna Louisa Prinsloo, Jacques P. de Wet
{"title":"宫廷舞蹈:对成熟的非营利组织的研究中的反身性和声誉敏感性","authors":"Erna Louisa Prinsloo, Jacques P. de Wet","doi":"10.1080/21528586.2022.2068158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Interactive research with large non-profit organisations holds the promise of deepening scholarship, benefitting the research enterprise, and improving service delivery to vulnerable groups. Research implementation can be finessed from start to completion by not being tone-deaf to the reputational sensitivities of well-established non-profit organisations and by being reflective about how the researcher contributes to the research process. Reflexivity and sensitivity contribute to mutual trust, keep the research process flowing, and energise the building of constructive research relationships. In this article, we reflect on the lessons learned by working with two cancer organisations, one of their flagship programmes, and a cross-section of their members. We discuss the conundrums of doing this type of research, highlight the continuous process of managing access as the study progresses, and offer practical ways of overcoming some of the challenges encountered.","PeriodicalId":44730,"journal":{"name":"South African Review of Sociology","volume":"68 1","pages":"57 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Courtly Dance: Reflexivity and Reputational Sensitivity in Research with Well-Established Non-Profit Organisations\",\"authors\":\"Erna Louisa Prinsloo, Jacques P. de Wet\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21528586.2022.2068158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Interactive research with large non-profit organisations holds the promise of deepening scholarship, benefitting the research enterprise, and improving service delivery to vulnerable groups. Research implementation can be finessed from start to completion by not being tone-deaf to the reputational sensitivities of well-established non-profit organisations and by being reflective about how the researcher contributes to the research process. Reflexivity and sensitivity contribute to mutual trust, keep the research process flowing, and energise the building of constructive research relationships. In this article, we reflect on the lessons learned by working with two cancer organisations, one of their flagship programmes, and a cross-section of their members. We discuss the conundrums of doing this type of research, highlight the continuous process of managing access as the study progresses, and offer practical ways of overcoming some of the challenges encountered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Review of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"57 - 72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Review of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2022.2068158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2022.2068158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与大型非营利组织的互动研究有望深化学术研究,使研究企业受益,并改善向弱势群体提供的服务。研究的实施可以从开始到完成,不要对成熟的非营利组织的声誉敏感性充耳不闻,并反思研究人员如何为研究过程做出贡献。反身性和敏感性有助于相互信任,保持研究过程的流畅,并促进建设性研究关系的建立。在这篇文章中,我们反思了与两个癌症组织合作的经验教训,其中一个是他们的旗舰项目,以及他们的部分成员。我们讨论了做这类研究的难题,强调了随着研究进展管理访问的持续过程,并提供了克服所遇到的一些挑战的实用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Courtly Dance: Reflexivity and Reputational Sensitivity in Research with Well-Established Non-Profit Organisations
ABSTRACT Interactive research with large non-profit organisations holds the promise of deepening scholarship, benefitting the research enterprise, and improving service delivery to vulnerable groups. Research implementation can be finessed from start to completion by not being tone-deaf to the reputational sensitivities of well-established non-profit organisations and by being reflective about how the researcher contributes to the research process. Reflexivity and sensitivity contribute to mutual trust, keep the research process flowing, and energise the building of constructive research relationships. In this article, we reflect on the lessons learned by working with two cancer organisations, one of their flagship programmes, and a cross-section of their members. We discuss the conundrums of doing this type of research, highlight the continuous process of managing access as the study progresses, and offer practical ways of overcoming some of the challenges encountered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Guerrillas and combative mothers: women and the armed struggle in South Africa Menstruation and Society in South Africa: A Desktop Analysis Women from the South. Poetics of the Encounter with Asia and Africa “Fighting to Be a Real Man”: Constructions of Respectability and Contestations among African Migrant Men in Johannesburg Exploring Heteronormativity and the Illusion of the “Real Man”: A Case Study of Sivuyile (Siv) Ngesi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1