违反全球信念和目标会导致生活压力带来的痛苦和意义吗?

Q2 Social Sciences Illness Crisis and Loss Pub Date : 2020-10-11 DOI:10.1177/1054137320958344
Login S. George, Crystal L. Park
{"title":"违反全球信念和目标会导致生活压力带来的痛苦和意义吗?","authors":"Login S. George, Crystal L. Park","doi":"10.1177/1054137320958344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theoretical and treatment approaches posit that violations of beliefs and goals by stressful experiences drive distress and meaning making. However, empirical work examining this notion is limited. Accordingly, we tested violations’ role in driving distress and meaning-making using repeated assessments among 180 undergraduates coping with a recent significant stressor. On four occasions over two months, we collected data on belief and goal violations, distress, and meaning making. A within-person analytic approach showed that when participants' violations changed, their distress and meaning making also changed in the same direction. Additionally, violations had a unique association with meaning making, independent of distress. Results suggest that experiencing discrepancy between a stressor and one's beliefs and goals may be distressing and lead to efforts to reduce that discrepancy. Additional research on how individuals successfully resolve violations could improve understanding and treatment of individuals dealing with significant stressors.","PeriodicalId":39747,"journal":{"name":"Illness Crisis and Loss","volume":"63 1","pages":"378 - 395"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Violations of Global Beliefs and Goals Drive Distress and Meaning Making Following Life Stressors?\",\"authors\":\"Login S. George, Crystal L. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1054137320958344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Theoretical and treatment approaches posit that violations of beliefs and goals by stressful experiences drive distress and meaning making. However, empirical work examining this notion is limited. Accordingly, we tested violations’ role in driving distress and meaning-making using repeated assessments among 180 undergraduates coping with a recent significant stressor. On four occasions over two months, we collected data on belief and goal violations, distress, and meaning making. A within-person analytic approach showed that when participants' violations changed, their distress and meaning making also changed in the same direction. Additionally, violations had a unique association with meaning making, independent of distress. Results suggest that experiencing discrepancy between a stressor and one's beliefs and goals may be distressing and lead to efforts to reduce that discrepancy. Additional research on how individuals successfully resolve violations could improve understanding and treatment of individuals dealing with significant stressors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Illness Crisis and Loss\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"378 - 395\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Illness Crisis and Loss\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1054137320958344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illness Crisis and Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1054137320958344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

理论和治疗方法假设,压力经历对信念和目标的违背会驱动痛苦和意义创造。然而,检验这一概念的实证工作是有限的。因此,我们在180名大学生中使用重复评估来测试违规行为在应对近期重大压力源中的驱动痛苦和意义制造中的作用。在两个月的时间里,我们收集了四次关于信念和目标违背、痛苦和意义创造的数据。一种个人分析方法表明,当参与者的违规行为发生变化时,他们的痛苦和意义制造也会朝着同一个方向变化。此外,违规行为与意义创造有独特的联系,独立于痛苦。结果表明,经历压力源与自己的信念和目标之间的差异可能会让人感到痛苦,并促使人们努力减少这种差异。对个体如何成功解决违规行为的进一步研究可以提高对个体处理重大压力源的理解和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Violations of Global Beliefs and Goals Drive Distress and Meaning Making Following Life Stressors?
Theoretical and treatment approaches posit that violations of beliefs and goals by stressful experiences drive distress and meaning making. However, empirical work examining this notion is limited. Accordingly, we tested violations’ role in driving distress and meaning-making using repeated assessments among 180 undergraduates coping with a recent significant stressor. On four occasions over two months, we collected data on belief and goal violations, distress, and meaning making. A within-person analytic approach showed that when participants' violations changed, their distress and meaning making also changed in the same direction. Additionally, violations had a unique association with meaning making, independent of distress. Results suggest that experiencing discrepancy between a stressor and one's beliefs and goals may be distressing and lead to efforts to reduce that discrepancy. Additional research on how individuals successfully resolve violations could improve understanding and treatment of individuals dealing with significant stressors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Illness Crisis and Loss
Illness Crisis and Loss Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: When dealing with issues of grief, crisis, or loss as a counselor, medical professional, or researcher, it can be difficult to find resources to help you in your work. Receiving the most current research on the latest topics in the field from Illness, Crisis & Loss can help. Illness, Crisis & Loss is the resource that furthers your understanding and knowledge of the psychosocial and ethical issues associated with life-threatening illness, traumatic human crises, grief, and loss.
期刊最新文献
Theorizing Post-Incarceration Transition Crisis and Readiness Through Veteran Identity Work Seeking Comfort and Demanding Agency—An Autoethnographic Exploration of a Patient and Partner Experience Network Analysis of Posttraumatic Growth Dimensions: A Cross-Sectional Study in People Who Experienced the Death of a Loved One from COVID-19 in 16 Latin American Countries The Qualitative DIGNISPACE Study: The Co-Design of a Life Review, Meaning-Making and Legacy Leaving Digital Intervention for Young People with Life-Limiting Conditions The Loss of a Spouse Following an Oncological Disease: A Scoping Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1