药物滥用行为治疗(BTSA)方案对法医双重诊断人群的服务评估

IF 0.7 4区 心理学 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1080/24732850.2021.2017551
Lara Arsuffi, Nadja Scarborough
{"title":"药物滥用行为治疗(BTSA)方案对法医双重诊断人群的服务评估","authors":"Lara Arsuffi, Nadja Scarborough","doi":"10.1080/24732850.2021.2017551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Literature links mental health problems comorbid with substance abuse with increased recovery time. There is limited research evaluating the effectiveness of substance abuse treatments for dual-diagnosis patients. This project aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BTSA group with this population. Questionnaires measuring motivation, locus of control, confidence to abstain and self-efficacy were administered to six different cohorts of BTSA participants (N = 38) at baseline, post, and follow-up stages. In addition, participants from the most recent BTSA cohort (N = 4) attended a post-program focus group, to provide information about their experiences of the intervention. Statistical analyses revealed that participants’ confidence in their ability to manage substance abuse was significantly higher post group, but the hypotheses that there would also be significant improvements in participants’ self-efficacy, motivation, and locus of control following completion of the program were not supported. Thematic analysis identified three key themes relevant to participants, namely validation, psychoeducation and identifying progress. This project provided valuable insights into participants’ experiences of the group, highlighting what they had gained form the intervention, and the impact on them from having Recovery Champions working in conjunction with NHS staff to facilitate the intervention. Limitations are discussed, alongside recommendations for improving the program.","PeriodicalId":15806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","volume":"189 1","pages":"201 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A service evaluation of the Behavioural Treatment for Substance Abuse (BTSA) programme for forensic dual diagnosis populations\",\"authors\":\"Lara Arsuffi, Nadja Scarborough\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24732850.2021.2017551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Literature links mental health problems comorbid with substance abuse with increased recovery time. There is limited research evaluating the effectiveness of substance abuse treatments for dual-diagnosis patients. This project aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BTSA group with this population. Questionnaires measuring motivation, locus of control, confidence to abstain and self-efficacy were administered to six different cohorts of BTSA participants (N = 38) at baseline, post, and follow-up stages. In addition, participants from the most recent BTSA cohort (N = 4) attended a post-program focus group, to provide information about their experiences of the intervention. Statistical analyses revealed that participants’ confidence in their ability to manage substance abuse was significantly higher post group, but the hypotheses that there would also be significant improvements in participants’ self-efficacy, motivation, and locus of control following completion of the program were not supported. Thematic analysis identified three key themes relevant to participants, namely validation, psychoeducation and identifying progress. This project provided valuable insights into participants’ experiences of the group, highlighting what they had gained form the intervention, and the impact on them from having Recovery Champions working in conjunction with NHS staff to facilitate the intervention. Limitations are discussed, alongside recommendations for improving the program.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"189 1\",\"pages\":\"201 - 226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2017551\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2021.2017551","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献将精神健康问题与药物滥用共病与恢复时间增加联系起来。有有限的研究评估药物滥用治疗双重诊断患者的有效性。本项目旨在评估BTSA组对这一人群的有效性。问卷测量动机、控制点、戒酒信心和自我效能感在基线、后期和随访阶段对6个不同队列的BTSA参与者(N = 38)进行调查。此外,来自最近BTSA队列的参与者(N = 4)参加了一个项目后焦点小组,以提供有关他们干预经验的信息。统计分析显示,参与者对自己管理药物滥用能力的信心在小组后显着提高,但在完成计划后参与者的自我效能感,动机和控制点也会有显着改善的假设不支持。专题分析确定了与参与者有关的三个关键主题,即验证、心理教育和确定进展。该项目为参与者的小组经验提供了宝贵的见解,突出了他们从干预中获得的东西,以及恢复冠军与NHS工作人员一起促进干预对他们的影响。讨论了局限性,并提出了改进程序的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A service evaluation of the Behavioural Treatment for Substance Abuse (BTSA) programme for forensic dual diagnosis populations
ABSTRACT Literature links mental health problems comorbid with substance abuse with increased recovery time. There is limited research evaluating the effectiveness of substance abuse treatments for dual-diagnosis patients. This project aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the BTSA group with this population. Questionnaires measuring motivation, locus of control, confidence to abstain and self-efficacy were administered to six different cohorts of BTSA participants (N = 38) at baseline, post, and follow-up stages. In addition, participants from the most recent BTSA cohort (N = 4) attended a post-program focus group, to provide information about their experiences of the intervention. Statistical analyses revealed that participants’ confidence in their ability to manage substance abuse was significantly higher post group, but the hypotheses that there would also be significant improvements in participants’ self-efficacy, motivation, and locus of control following completion of the program were not supported. Thematic analysis identified three key themes relevant to participants, namely validation, psychoeducation and identifying progress. This project provided valuable insights into participants’ experiences of the group, highlighting what they had gained form the intervention, and the impact on them from having Recovery Champions working in conjunction with NHS staff to facilitate the intervention. Limitations are discussed, alongside recommendations for improving the program.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Good Lives Model Among Students: The Role of Primary Goods and Self-Regulation in Achieving a Good Life An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the Paraphilic Interests and Disorders Scale Forensic Doctorate Trainee Views on an Expert by Experience (EbE)-Led Workshop: A Qualitative Exploration of Trainee Reflections Institutional Child Abuse: The Role of Disclosure, Risk, and Protective Factors in Understanding Trauma Responses Exploring the Impact of Animal Therapy on Prisoner Wellbeing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1