两种育种方法对亚麻种群的影响

Taha, A. A. El-hoary, S. Sedhom, S. Mehasen
{"title":"两种育种方法对亚麻种群的影响","authors":"Taha, A. A. El-hoary, S. Sedhom, S. Mehasen","doi":"10.21608/assjm.2022.275074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The experiment was carried out at the Etay El-Baroud Experiment Station, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt during the three successive seasons of 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. The present study aimed at measuring the efficiency of two methods of selection used in the flax breeding program namely; pedigree method (PM) and bulk method (BM) on one flax population droved from previous work by the other (self) in 2014. F 2 seed from the previous work furnished the source material for subsequent generations of flax populations (S2465/1 × Giza 8). In 2017 season, the high yielding selected lines (20) from each methods of breeding (two methods i.e . pedigree and bulk). Comparison between two breeding methods, mean square due to breeding methods were significant for days to flowering , No. of capsules / plant , length of fruiting zone , No. of seeds / capsule , seed index , seed yield /plant , technical stem length , and oil percentage. This result indicated the difference between breading methods. The pedigree methods gave the highest value for all traits . The pedigree method proved to be more efficient than bulk method for selection based on these traits may be due to the two parent good combiner for most traits. Also, gave the earliness of days to flowering. These result in this cross where a two parent were good combiner for most trait. For days to flowering, the result indicated that the pedigree method produced more superior lines than bulk method compared the best parent with fifteen and sixteen lines respectably. The best line was No. 7 of pedigree method. As for No. of capsule/ plant , 20 and 9 lines showed significant higher than best parent for pedigree and bulk method gave the highest number of capsules/ plant . Regarding to No. of basal branches/plant, the pedigree method produced consistently none superior parent compared the best parent, with three and four lines for pedigree and bulk, respectively. For No. of seeds / capsules, only the line No. 14 of pedigree method of breeding gave the highest no. of seeds / capsule. Concerning seed index, all lines of pedigree and bulk methods surpassed the best parent. Also, the line No. 9 of pedigree method gave the behavior seed index. With regard to seed yield/plant, four and six lines surpassed significant seed. Yield compare the best parent. The best line was No. 19 of pedigree followed by No. 2 of bulk method of breeding. For total length, sixteen lines of both breeding methods surpassed significant compare the best parent. The best line was No. 1 of pedigree method (123, 67). Regarding technical stem length, fourteen and nine lines showed significant higher than the best parent for pedigree and bulk methods, respectively the best line was No. 6 (112. 67 ) followed by No. 5 ( 111 . 33 ) of pedigree method . For fiber percentage, none of lines showed significant compare the best parent or over mean.","PeriodicalId":7920,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population\",\"authors\":\"Taha, A. A. El-hoary, S. Sedhom, S. Mehasen\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/assjm.2022.275074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The experiment was carried out at the Etay El-Baroud Experiment Station, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt during the three successive seasons of 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. The present study aimed at measuring the efficiency of two methods of selection used in the flax breeding program namely; pedigree method (PM) and bulk method (BM) on one flax population droved from previous work by the other (self) in 2014. F 2 seed from the previous work furnished the source material for subsequent generations of flax populations (S2465/1 × Giza 8). In 2017 season, the high yielding selected lines (20) from each methods of breeding (two methods i.e . pedigree and bulk). Comparison between two breeding methods, mean square due to breeding methods were significant for days to flowering , No. of capsules / plant , length of fruiting zone , No. of seeds / capsule , seed index , seed yield /plant , technical stem length , and oil percentage. This result indicated the difference between breading methods. The pedigree methods gave the highest value for all traits . The pedigree method proved to be more efficient than bulk method for selection based on these traits may be due to the two parent good combiner for most traits. Also, gave the earliness of days to flowering. These result in this cross where a two parent were good combiner for most trait. For days to flowering, the result indicated that the pedigree method produced more superior lines than bulk method compared the best parent with fifteen and sixteen lines respectably. The best line was No. 7 of pedigree method. As for No. of capsule/ plant , 20 and 9 lines showed significant higher than best parent for pedigree and bulk method gave the highest number of capsules/ plant . Regarding to No. of basal branches/plant, the pedigree method produced consistently none superior parent compared the best parent, with three and four lines for pedigree and bulk, respectively. For No. of seeds / capsules, only the line No. 14 of pedigree method of breeding gave the highest no. of seeds / capsule. Concerning seed index, all lines of pedigree and bulk methods surpassed the best parent. Also, the line No. 9 of pedigree method gave the behavior seed index. With regard to seed yield/plant, four and six lines surpassed significant seed. Yield compare the best parent. The best line was No. 19 of pedigree followed by No. 2 of bulk method of breeding. For total length, sixteen lines of both breeding methods surpassed significant compare the best parent. The best line was No. 1 of pedigree method (123, 67). Regarding technical stem length, fourteen and nine lines showed significant higher than the best parent for pedigree and bulk methods, respectively the best line was No. 6 (112. 67 ) followed by No. 5 ( 111 . 33 ) of pedigree method . For fiber percentage, none of lines showed significant compare the best parent or over mean.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/assjm.2022.275074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/assjm.2022.275074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该实验于2014-2015年、2015-2016年和2016-2017年连续三个季节在埃及El-Beheira省Etay El-Baroud实验站进行。本研究旨在测量亚麻育种计划中使用的两种选择方法的效率,即;谱系法(PM)和群体法(BM)在2014年由另一个(自我)的先前工作证明。先前工作的f2种子为后代亚麻群体(S2465/1 × Giza 8)提供了源材料。2017年,每种育种方法(两种方法:纯种和散装)。两种育种方法之间的比较,由于育种方法的均方差显著,开花天数,No。蒴果数/株,结果区长度,编号:种子/蒴果,种子指数,种子产量/株,技术茎长,油率。这一结果表明了不同面包方法的差异。家谱法对所有性状的评价值最高。家谱法在性状选择上比批量法更有效,这可能是由于大多数性状的双亲组合良好所致。同时,也使开花的时间提前。这导致双亲杂交在大多数性状上都是很好的组合。结果表明,在开花前几天,系谱法比散装法分别以15和16个系为最佳亲本,产生了更多的优良系。系谱法最佳系为7号系。至于No。在荚果/株上,20个和9个品系的系谱显著高于最佳亲本,散装法荚果/株数最高。关于第……在基枝/株上,系谱法得到的亲本与最佳亲本相比一致为无优等亲本,系谱和体积分别为3系和4系。没有。在种子/蒴果中,只有纯种育种方法的14号系的种子/蒴果数最高。种子/蒴果。在种子指数方面,所有系谱系和散装法均优于最佳亲本。同时,系谱法第9行给出了行为种子索引。单株种子产量方面,4个和6个品系的种子产量均超过显著水平。产量比较最好的亲本。最佳系系为纯种19号,其次为散装育种2号。在总长度上,两种育种方法均有16个品系显著超过最佳亲本。系谱法的最佳系为1号(123,67)。在技术茎长方面,14个品系和9个品系显著高于系谱法和散装法的最佳亲本,其中最佳品系为6号(112)。第67名,第五名(111名)。33)系谱法。在纤维率方面,各品系与最佳亲本或平均值相比均无显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficiency of Two Breeding Methods on Flax Population
The experiment was carried out at the Etay El-Baroud Experiment Station, El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt during the three successive seasons of 2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017. The present study aimed at measuring the efficiency of two methods of selection used in the flax breeding program namely; pedigree method (PM) and bulk method (BM) on one flax population droved from previous work by the other (self) in 2014. F 2 seed from the previous work furnished the source material for subsequent generations of flax populations (S2465/1 × Giza 8). In 2017 season, the high yielding selected lines (20) from each methods of breeding (two methods i.e . pedigree and bulk). Comparison between two breeding methods, mean square due to breeding methods were significant for days to flowering , No. of capsules / plant , length of fruiting zone , No. of seeds / capsule , seed index , seed yield /plant , technical stem length , and oil percentage. This result indicated the difference between breading methods. The pedigree methods gave the highest value for all traits . The pedigree method proved to be more efficient than bulk method for selection based on these traits may be due to the two parent good combiner for most traits. Also, gave the earliness of days to flowering. These result in this cross where a two parent were good combiner for most trait. For days to flowering, the result indicated that the pedigree method produced more superior lines than bulk method compared the best parent with fifteen and sixteen lines respectably. The best line was No. 7 of pedigree method. As for No. of capsule/ plant , 20 and 9 lines showed significant higher than best parent for pedigree and bulk method gave the highest number of capsules/ plant . Regarding to No. of basal branches/plant, the pedigree method produced consistently none superior parent compared the best parent, with three and four lines for pedigree and bulk, respectively. For No. of seeds / capsules, only the line No. 14 of pedigree method of breeding gave the highest no. of seeds / capsule. Concerning seed index, all lines of pedigree and bulk methods surpassed the best parent. Also, the line No. 9 of pedigree method gave the behavior seed index. With regard to seed yield/plant, four and six lines surpassed significant seed. Yield compare the best parent. The best line was No. 19 of pedigree followed by No. 2 of bulk method of breeding. For total length, sixteen lines of both breeding methods surpassed significant compare the best parent. The best line was No. 1 of pedigree method (123, 67). Regarding technical stem length, fourteen and nine lines showed significant higher than the best parent for pedigree and bulk methods, respectively the best line was No. 6 (112. 67 ) followed by No. 5 ( 111 . 33 ) of pedigree method . For fiber percentage, none of lines showed significant compare the best parent or over mean.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Efficiency of Some Essential Oils and Nano-Chitosan against Multidrug Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus That Isolated From Some Food Isolation of Some Lactic Acid Bacteria from Poultry and Evaluation for Their Probiotic Features Effect of Foliar Application with Putrescine and Benzyladenine on Vegetative Growth, Yield and Its Components and Seed Oil Contents of Chia (Salvia Hispanica l.) Plants Grown under Water Stress Conditions Theoretical and Experimental Physicomechanical Properties of Cultivating Pots Made From Different Materials Synthesis and Physico-chemical Properties of some New Surface Active Agents and their Improvement Effects on Emamectin benzoate against Spodoptera littoralis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1