在发生的房间里:在定性研究中亲自收集还是远程收集数据?

J. Wray, D. Barrett
{"title":"在发生的房间里:在定性研究中亲自收集还是远程收集数据?","authors":"J. Wray, D. Barrett","doi":"10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103535 Introduction Qualitative research is founded on the collection of rich data through methods such as onetoone interviews and focus groups, and usually with all parties together in the same place (referred to thereafter as the ‘inperson’ approach). However, since the onset of the COVID19 pandemic in early 2020, access to health and social care settings has been restricted and many researchers have been subjected to ‘workathome’ orders. Consequently, there has been a rapid transition to many interactions and meetings taking place remotely, using technologies such as videoconferencing platforms. This has impacted substantially on opportunities for inperson data collection. But has the pandemic damaged the ability to gather rich qualitative data, or has it served as a catalyst for more effective, efficient and pragmatic approach to qualitative data collection? In this paper, we explore the arguments for and against remote data collection in qualitative research, focusing specifically on the use of the telephone and Videomediated communication .","PeriodicalId":12178,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Journals","volume":"1 1","pages":"44 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the room where it happens: in-person or remote data collection in qualitative research?\",\"authors\":\"J. Wray, D. Barrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103535 Introduction Qualitative research is founded on the collection of rich data through methods such as onetoone interviews and focus groups, and usually with all parties together in the same place (referred to thereafter as the ‘inperson’ approach). However, since the onset of the COVID19 pandemic in early 2020, access to health and social care settings has been restricted and many researchers have been subjected to ‘workathome’ orders. Consequently, there has been a rapid transition to many interactions and meetings taking place remotely, using technologies such as videoconferencing platforms. This has impacted substantially on opportunities for inperson data collection. But has the pandemic damaged the ability to gather rich qualitative data, or has it served as a catalyst for more effective, efficient and pragmatic approach to qualitative data collection? In this paper, we explore the arguments for and against remote data collection in qualitative research, focusing specifically on the use of the telephone and Videomediated communication .\",\"PeriodicalId\":12178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Journals\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Journals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Journals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

定性研究是建立在通过一对一访谈和焦点小组等方法收集丰富数据的基础上的,通常是将所有各方聚集在同一个地方(后来称为“面对面”方法)。然而,自2019冠状病毒病大流行于2020年初爆发以来,获得卫生和社会护理环境的机会受到限制,许多研究人员受到“工作场所”的命令。因此,使用视频会议平台等技术,已经迅速过渡到远程进行的许多互动和会议。这极大地影响了个人数据收集的机会。但是,大流行是否损害了收集丰富定性数据的能力,还是促进了对定性数据收集采取更有效、高效和务实的方法?在本文中,我们探讨了定性研究中支持和反对远程数据收集的论点,特别关注电话和视频中介通信的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In the room where it happens: in-person or remote data collection in qualitative research?
10.1136/ebnurs-2022-103535 Introduction Qualitative research is founded on the collection of rich data through methods such as onetoone interviews and focus groups, and usually with all parties together in the same place (referred to thereafter as the ‘inperson’ approach). However, since the onset of the COVID19 pandemic in early 2020, access to health and social care settings has been restricted and many researchers have been subjected to ‘workathome’ orders. Consequently, there has been a rapid transition to many interactions and meetings taking place remotely, using technologies such as videoconferencing platforms. This has impacted substantially on opportunities for inperson data collection. But has the pandemic damaged the ability to gather rich qualitative data, or has it served as a catalyst for more effective, efficient and pragmatic approach to qualitative data collection? In this paper, we explore the arguments for and against remote data collection in qualitative research, focusing specifically on the use of the telephone and Videomediated communication .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
KT: why it should be ‘hotter’ than it is Inclusivity in nurse education What is Q methodology? Quality of care in the delivery hospital contributes to racial disparities in outcomes for low-risk newborns In the room where it happens: in-person or remote data collection in qualitative research?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1