沃尔多、盲人询问者和一头大象:在社会运动中定位学习

IF 3 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of the Learning Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1080/10508406.2021.1880190
F. Erickson
{"title":"沃尔多、盲人询问者和一头大象:在社会运动中定位学习","authors":"F. Erickson","doi":"10.1080/10508406.2021.1880190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This special issue introduces a new focus for inquiry in the learning sciences. When research attention turns to learning that takes place within social movements, the scope and scale of inquiry expands dramatically. It becomes difficult to see learning, as we usually conceive it. The author’s commentary begins with two metaphors for difficulty in this new arena of research. A first metaphor is that of “Waldo,” a cartoon figure visually represented as located somewhere within crowds of persons that are similarly dressed. This illustrates the problem of scale in the study of social movements, in attempts to monitor activity that is widely dispersed in space and time. A second metaphor is that of blind inquirers attempting to study an elephant—each inquirer only gets a partial apprehension of the whole. This points to the multiplicity of opportunities to learn within social movements—raising awareness in social critique, acquiring skills in organizing, developing fluency in rhetorics of persuasion. Because movement-situated learning is so multidimensional it is difficult for a single study to account for the full range of learning opportunities that a movement affords. In its middle section the commentary surveys specific examples of limits and affordances in research on learning in social movements, by reviewing briefly the empirical studies reported in the journal articles and by recounting the author’s personal experience in the Civil Rights movement in Chicago in the 1960’s. The commentary concludes on a cautionary note, observing that many of the processes of social movement formation, and of learning opportunities that develop within such movements, are similar in movements that are regressive as well as in those that are progressive in aim.","PeriodicalId":48043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","volume":"27 1 1","pages":"151 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waldo, blind inquirers, and an elephant: Locating learning in social movements\",\"authors\":\"F. Erickson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10508406.2021.1880190\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This special issue introduces a new focus for inquiry in the learning sciences. When research attention turns to learning that takes place within social movements, the scope and scale of inquiry expands dramatically. It becomes difficult to see learning, as we usually conceive it. The author’s commentary begins with two metaphors for difficulty in this new arena of research. A first metaphor is that of “Waldo,” a cartoon figure visually represented as located somewhere within crowds of persons that are similarly dressed. This illustrates the problem of scale in the study of social movements, in attempts to monitor activity that is widely dispersed in space and time. A second metaphor is that of blind inquirers attempting to study an elephant—each inquirer only gets a partial apprehension of the whole. This points to the multiplicity of opportunities to learn within social movements—raising awareness in social critique, acquiring skills in organizing, developing fluency in rhetorics of persuasion. Because movement-situated learning is so multidimensional it is difficult for a single study to account for the full range of learning opportunities that a movement affords. In its middle section the commentary surveys specific examples of limits and affordances in research on learning in social movements, by reviewing briefly the empirical studies reported in the journal articles and by recounting the author’s personal experience in the Civil Rights movement in Chicago in the 1960’s. The commentary concludes on a cautionary note, observing that many of the processes of social movement formation, and of learning opportunities that develop within such movements, are similar in movements that are regressive as well as in those that are progressive in aim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Learning Sciences\",\"volume\":\"27 1 1\",\"pages\":\"151 - 161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Learning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1880190\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1880190","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这期特刊介绍了学习科学探究的新焦点。当研究的注意力转向社会运动中发生的学习时,调查的范围和规模就会急剧扩大。很难像我们通常想象的那样看到学习。作者的评论一开始就用了两个比喻来形容这个新的研究领域的困难。第一个比喻是“沃尔多”(Waldo),这是一个卡通人物,在视觉上表现为位于穿着相似的人群中的某个地方。这说明了社会运动研究中的规模问题,试图监测在空间和时间上广泛分散的活动。第二个比喻是试图研究一头大象的盲目的询问者——每个询问者只能得到整体的部分理解。这指出了在社会运动中学习的机会的多样性——提高社会批判的意识,获得组织技能,发展流利的说服修辞。由于运动情境下的学习是如此的多维,单一的研究很难解释一个运动所提供的全部学习机会。在评论的中间部分,通过简要回顾期刊文章中报道的实证研究和叙述作者在20世纪60年代芝加哥民权运动中的个人经历,调查了社会运动中学习研究的局限性和启示的具体例子。这篇评论在总结时提出了一个警告,指出社会运动形成的许多过程,以及在这些运动中发展起来的学习机会,在倒退的运动中与在目标上进步的运动中是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Waldo, blind inquirers, and an elephant: Locating learning in social movements
ABSTRACT This special issue introduces a new focus for inquiry in the learning sciences. When research attention turns to learning that takes place within social movements, the scope and scale of inquiry expands dramatically. It becomes difficult to see learning, as we usually conceive it. The author’s commentary begins with two metaphors for difficulty in this new arena of research. A first metaphor is that of “Waldo,” a cartoon figure visually represented as located somewhere within crowds of persons that are similarly dressed. This illustrates the problem of scale in the study of social movements, in attempts to monitor activity that is widely dispersed in space and time. A second metaphor is that of blind inquirers attempting to study an elephant—each inquirer only gets a partial apprehension of the whole. This points to the multiplicity of opportunities to learn within social movements—raising awareness in social critique, acquiring skills in organizing, developing fluency in rhetorics of persuasion. Because movement-situated learning is so multidimensional it is difficult for a single study to account for the full range of learning opportunities that a movement affords. In its middle section the commentary surveys specific examples of limits and affordances in research on learning in social movements, by reviewing briefly the empirical studies reported in the journal articles and by recounting the author’s personal experience in the Civil Rights movement in Chicago in the 1960’s. The commentary concludes on a cautionary note, observing that many of the processes of social movement formation, and of learning opportunities that develop within such movements, are similar in movements that are regressive as well as in those that are progressive in aim.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Journal of the Learning Sciences (JLS) is one of the two official journals of the International Society of the Learning Sciences ( www.isls.org). JLS provides a multidisciplinary forum for research on education and learning that informs theories of how people learn and the design of learning environments. It publishes research that elucidates processes of learning, and the ways in which technologies, instructional practices, and learning environments can be designed to support learning in different contexts. JLS articles draw on theoretical frameworks from such diverse fields as cognitive science, sociocultural theory, educational psychology, computer science, and anthropology. Submissions are not limited to any particular research method, but must be based on rigorous analyses that present new insights into how people learn and/or how learning can be supported and enhanced. Successful submissions should position their argument within extant literature in the learning sciences. They should reflect the core practices and foci that have defined the learning sciences as a field: privileging design in methodology and pedagogy; emphasizing interdisciplinarity and methodological innovation; grounding research in real-world contexts; answering questions about learning process and mechanism, alongside outcomes; pursuing technological and pedagogical innovation; and maintaining a strong connection between research and practice.
期刊最新文献
Reframing design in education: Proposing a framework to support pre-service teachers in adopting designerly stances The role of individual preparation before collaboration: An exploratory study on students’ computer-supported collaborative argumentation in a primary classroom Toward epistemic justice in socio-scientific decision-making: How youth make sense of lively COVID-19 and vaccines data Learning and constructions of us and them in teachers’ collaborative groups Interdisciplinary learning in the humanities: Knowledge building and identity work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1