网络学术文章的阅读模式和格式

Y. Rho, Tom Gedeon
{"title":"网络学术文章的阅读模式和格式","authors":"Y. Rho, Tom Gedeon","doi":"10.1145/333329.333348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various formats are being used for Web-based academic articles such as conference papers and journal papers. We surveyed the formats being used and tried to identify reading activities and the proper formats by carrying out two online surveys: an email-based survey with an email-based questionnaire and a Web-based survey with a Web-based questionnaire.The survey results show that readers overview Web-based academic articles from the screen, print them out and then read the printed articles. The results also show that the structural formats employed by most papers on the Web are against readers' preferences. The simple two-frame format was most preferred by 47% of the respondents as readers, but the cascade format of page windows was regarded as the worst by 65%. An interesting result is that 26% of the respondents selected as the worst style the paper-like format that is currently widely used for Web-based articles. Brief data sets and results are shown in this article.In addition, the importance of examples embedded in the Web-based questionnaire was shown by two consecutive surveys.","PeriodicalId":7397,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGCHI Bull.","volume":"7 1","pages":"67-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reading patterns and formats of academic articles on the Web\",\"authors\":\"Y. Rho, Tom Gedeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/333329.333348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Various formats are being used for Web-based academic articles such as conference papers and journal papers. We surveyed the formats being used and tried to identify reading activities and the proper formats by carrying out two online surveys: an email-based survey with an email-based questionnaire and a Web-based survey with a Web-based questionnaire.The survey results show that readers overview Web-based academic articles from the screen, print them out and then read the printed articles. The results also show that the structural formats employed by most papers on the Web are against readers' preferences. The simple two-frame format was most preferred by 47% of the respondents as readers, but the cascade format of page windows was regarded as the worst by 65%. An interesting result is that 26% of the respondents selected as the worst style the paper-like format that is currently widely used for Web-based articles. Brief data sets and results are shown in this article.In addition, the importance of examples embedded in the Web-based questionnaire was shown by two consecutive surveys.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGCHI Bull.\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"67-71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGCHI Bull.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGCHI Bull.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

基于网络的学术文章(如会议论文和期刊论文)采用了各种格式。我们调查了正在使用的格式,并试图通过进行两个在线调查来确定阅读活动和适当的格式:一个基于电子邮件的调查,一个基于电子邮件的调查,一个基于网络的调查,一个基于网络的调查。调查结果显示,读者从屏幕上浏览网络学术文章,打印出来,然后阅读打印出来的文章。结果还表明,大多数网络论文采用的结构格式与读者的偏好相悖。47%的受访者最喜欢简单的两帧格式,但65%的人认为页面窗口的级联格式是最差的。一个有趣的结果是,26%的受访者选择了目前广泛用于网络文章的类似纸张的格式作为最差的样式。本文给出了简要的数据集和结果。此外,通过连续两次调查显示了基于网络的问卷中嵌入的示例的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reading patterns and formats of academic articles on the Web
Various formats are being used for Web-based academic articles such as conference papers and journal papers. We surveyed the formats being used and tried to identify reading activities and the proper formats by carrying out two online surveys: an email-based survey with an email-based questionnaire and a Web-based survey with a Web-based questionnaire.The survey results show that readers overview Web-based academic articles from the screen, print them out and then read the printed articles. The results also show that the structural formats employed by most papers on the Web are against readers' preferences. The simple two-frame format was most preferred by 47% of the respondents as readers, but the cascade format of page windows was regarded as the worst by 65%. An interesting result is that 26% of the respondents selected as the worst style the paper-like format that is currently widely used for Web-based articles. Brief data sets and results are shown in this article.In addition, the importance of examples embedded in the Web-based questionnaire was shown by two consecutive surveys.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Students Coordinating user interfaces for consistency Universal commands for telephony-based spoken language systems The magic of visual interaction design On sharing resources and donating books: What are we doing wrong? Is this the bull-in-a-china-shop syndrome?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1