恒河下游平原小粒香稻的杂草控制、产量和品质对间距和杂草管理的影响

A. Pal, M. Ghosh, D. Mazumdar, B. Patra, S. Banerjee
{"title":"恒河下游平原小粒香稻的杂草控制、产量和品质对间距和杂草管理的影响","authors":"A. Pal, M. Ghosh, D. Mazumdar, B. Patra, S. Banerjee","doi":"10.35709/ory.2022.59.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of planting density and weed management on weed control, yield and quality of a non-Basmati type short-grained scented rice (cv. Radhunipagal) was studied at 'C' Block Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal. The field experiment was conducted in a split-plot design comprising 2 spacings (15 cm × 15 cm and 20 cm × 15 cm) in main plots and 6 weed control practices [weedy check, 2 hand weeding (HW), Butachlor as pre-emergence (PE) + HW, Butachlor (PE) + 2,4-D Na-salt as post-emergence (PoE), HW + 2,4-D Na-salt (PoE), mechanical weeding + HW) in sub-plots during rainy (kharif) season of 2013 and 2014. Mean number of total weeds in 1 m2 field was 94.3 and 118.8 at 28 and 56 days after transplanting (DAT); and weed control efficiency varied among 5 weed management practices over weedy check as: 49.0-67.3% at 28 DAT and 56.5-72.8% at 56 DAT. Close planting (15 cm × 15 cm) resulted in 9.1% greater grain yield (2.27 vs. 2.08 t/ha), higher net income (Rs. 23,700 vs. 20,900/ha) and B:C ratio (1.79 vs. 1.73) over wider spacing (20 cm × 15 cm). Manual weeding twice at 21 and 42 DAT recorded better weed control efficiency (67.3 and 72.8% at 28 and 56 DAT), grain yield (2.51 t/ha), milling recovery (65.9%) and net return (Rs. 25,900/ha). But chemical weed control [Butachlor (PE) + 2,4-D Na-salt (PoE)] was adjudged as less expensive option (Rs. 27,300/ha) for Radhunipagal rice with moderate grain yield (2.16 t/ha ), higher protein content (7.45%) and B: C ratio (1.90).","PeriodicalId":19618,"journal":{"name":"ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weed control, yield and quality of small-grain scented rice as influenced by spacing and weed management in lower gangetic plains\",\"authors\":\"A. Pal, M. Ghosh, D. Mazumdar, B. Patra, S. Banerjee\",\"doi\":\"10.35709/ory.2022.59.1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effect of planting density and weed management on weed control, yield and quality of a non-Basmati type short-grained scented rice (cv. Radhunipagal) was studied at 'C' Block Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal. The field experiment was conducted in a split-plot design comprising 2 spacings (15 cm × 15 cm and 20 cm × 15 cm) in main plots and 6 weed control practices [weedy check, 2 hand weeding (HW), Butachlor as pre-emergence (PE) + HW, Butachlor (PE) + 2,4-D Na-salt as post-emergence (PoE), HW + 2,4-D Na-salt (PoE), mechanical weeding + HW) in sub-plots during rainy (kharif) season of 2013 and 2014. Mean number of total weeds in 1 m2 field was 94.3 and 118.8 at 28 and 56 days after transplanting (DAT); and weed control efficiency varied among 5 weed management practices over weedy check as: 49.0-67.3% at 28 DAT and 56.5-72.8% at 56 DAT. Close planting (15 cm × 15 cm) resulted in 9.1% greater grain yield (2.27 vs. 2.08 t/ha), higher net income (Rs. 23,700 vs. 20,900/ha) and B:C ratio (1.79 vs. 1.73) over wider spacing (20 cm × 15 cm). Manual weeding twice at 21 and 42 DAT recorded better weed control efficiency (67.3 and 72.8% at 28 and 56 DAT), grain yield (2.51 t/ha), milling recovery (65.9%) and net return (Rs. 25,900/ha). But chemical weed control [Butachlor (PE) + 2,4-D Na-salt (PoE)] was adjudged as less expensive option (Rs. 27,300/ha) for Radhunipagal rice with moderate grain yield (2.16 t/ha ), higher protein content (7.45%) and B: C ratio (1.90).\",\"PeriodicalId\":19618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2022.59.1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORYZA- An International Journal on Rice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35709/ory.2022.59.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种植密度和杂草管理对非巴斯马蒂型短粒香稻杂草控制、产量和品质的影响。Radhunipagal)在西孟加拉邦纳迪亚Kalyani的Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya的“C”区块农场进行了研究。田间试验采用分块设计,主样地采用2个间距(15 cm × 15 cm和20 cm × 15 cm),子样地采用6种除草措施[杂草检查、2次手除草(HW)、丁草胺(PE) + HW、丁草胺(PE) + 2,4- d钠盐(PoE)、HW + 2,4- d钠盐(PoE)、机械除草+ HW],分别于2013年和2014年雨季进行。移栽后28和56 d, 1 m2田间平均杂草总数分别为94.3和118.8株;5种杂草管理措施的杂草控制效率差异为:28个DAT时为49.0 ~ 67.3%,56个DAT时为56.5 ~ 72.8%。密植(15 cm × 15 cm)比宽间距(20 cm × 15 cm)增产9.1%(2.27吨/公顷比2.08吨/公顷),提高净收入(23,700卢比比20,900卢比/公顷)和B:C比(1.79比1.73)。在21日和42日进行两次人工除草,除草效率(28日和56日分别为67.3和72.8%)、籽粒产量(2.51吨/公顷)、碾磨回收率(65.9%)和净收益(25,900卢比/公顷)均有所提高。但对于产量适中(2.16 t/ha)、蛋白质含量较高(7.45%)、B: C比为1.90的Radhunipagal水稻而言,化学除草[丁草胺(PE) + 2,4- d钠盐(PoE)]成本较低(2.73万美元/公顷)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Weed control, yield and quality of small-grain scented rice as influenced by spacing and weed management in lower gangetic plains
The effect of planting density and weed management on weed control, yield and quality of a non-Basmati type short-grained scented rice (cv. Radhunipagal) was studied at 'C' Block Farm of Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, Nadia, West Bengal. The field experiment was conducted in a split-plot design comprising 2 spacings (15 cm × 15 cm and 20 cm × 15 cm) in main plots and 6 weed control practices [weedy check, 2 hand weeding (HW), Butachlor as pre-emergence (PE) + HW, Butachlor (PE) + 2,4-D Na-salt as post-emergence (PoE), HW + 2,4-D Na-salt (PoE), mechanical weeding + HW) in sub-plots during rainy (kharif) season of 2013 and 2014. Mean number of total weeds in 1 m2 field was 94.3 and 118.8 at 28 and 56 days after transplanting (DAT); and weed control efficiency varied among 5 weed management practices over weedy check as: 49.0-67.3% at 28 DAT and 56.5-72.8% at 56 DAT. Close planting (15 cm × 15 cm) resulted in 9.1% greater grain yield (2.27 vs. 2.08 t/ha), higher net income (Rs. 23,700 vs. 20,900/ha) and B:C ratio (1.79 vs. 1.73) over wider spacing (20 cm × 15 cm). Manual weeding twice at 21 and 42 DAT recorded better weed control efficiency (67.3 and 72.8% at 28 and 56 DAT), grain yield (2.51 t/ha), milling recovery (65.9%) and net return (Rs. 25,900/ha). But chemical weed control [Butachlor (PE) + 2,4-D Na-salt (PoE)] was adjudged as less expensive option (Rs. 27,300/ha) for Radhunipagal rice with moderate grain yield (2.16 t/ha ), higher protein content (7.45%) and B: C ratio (1.90).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Toxicity and resistance levels of phosphine against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Sitophilus oryzae (L.) populations Severity and distribution of bacterial leaf blight of rice in different rice growing ecosystems of Karnataka state of India Morpho-genetic characterization of black-husked small-grain aromatic rice landrace Kalojira of West Bengal Effect of prohexadione-calcium onphotosynthetic and yield parameters in basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) against lodging stress Use of plant essential oils for the management of sheath blight disease in rice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1