Kahoot !, Plickers And Socrative: ICT资源评估小学教育中的音乐内容

Apertura Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI:10.32870/ap.v14n1.2134
Narciso José López García
{"title":"Kahoot !, Plickers And Socrative: ICT资源评估小学教育中的音乐内容","authors":"Narciso José López García","doi":"10.32870/ap.v14n1.2134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing musical competencies is a complicated process. However, the implementation of ICT in the classroom has facilitated this task, helping the Music education teacher to collect data in real time to describe the level of musical content of the students and information to fill in the required official documents. In this study, different evaluation strategies in music education are analyzed, as well as the main characteristics of three digital platforms, Kahoot!, Plickers and Socrative, whose main potential lies in the generation of gamified evaluation tests and evaluation and qualification reports of the students required by the educational administrations. The work method has been the analysis of information, which has served to make an exhaustive description of these platforms with the aim of providing the teachers information and tools that enable them to use and implement ICT in the evaluation of musical content of the Primary Education curriculum. Finally, the conclusions related to the benefits and limitations of these digital tools when applied in the Music classroom are presented.","PeriodicalId":7948,"journal":{"name":"Apertura","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kahoot!, Plickers And Socrative: ICT resources to assess musical content in Primary Education\",\"authors\":\"Narciso José López García\",\"doi\":\"10.32870/ap.v14n1.2134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessing musical competencies is a complicated process. However, the implementation of ICT in the classroom has facilitated this task, helping the Music education teacher to collect data in real time to describe the level of musical content of the students and information to fill in the required official documents. In this study, different evaluation strategies in music education are analyzed, as well as the main characteristics of three digital platforms, Kahoot!, Plickers and Socrative, whose main potential lies in the generation of gamified evaluation tests and evaluation and qualification reports of the students required by the educational administrations. The work method has been the analysis of information, which has served to make an exhaustive description of these platforms with the aim of providing the teachers information and tools that enable them to use and implement ICT in the evaluation of musical content of the Primary Education curriculum. Finally, the conclusions related to the benefits and limitations of these digital tools when applied in the Music classroom are presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Apertura\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Apertura\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v14n1.2134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apertura","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v14n1.2134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估音乐能力是一个复杂的过程。然而,ICT在课堂上的实施为这项任务提供了便利,帮助音乐教育教师实时收集数据来描述学生的音乐内容水平和填写所需的官方文件。本研究分析了音乐教育中不同的评价策略,以及三大数字平台Kahoot!Plickers和Socrative,其主要潜力在于生成游戏化的评估测试以及教育行政部门要求的学生评估和资格报告。工作方法是对信息进行分析,对这些平台进行详尽的描述,目的是为教师提供信息和工具,使他们能够在小学教育课程的音乐内容评估中使用和实施信息和通信技术。最后,提出了与这些数字工具在音乐课堂应用时的好处和局限性相关的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kahoot!, Plickers And Socrative: ICT resources to assess musical content in Primary Education
Assessing musical competencies is a complicated process. However, the implementation of ICT in the classroom has facilitated this task, helping the Music education teacher to collect data in real time to describe the level of musical content of the students and information to fill in the required official documents. In this study, different evaluation strategies in music education are analyzed, as well as the main characteristics of three digital platforms, Kahoot!, Plickers and Socrative, whose main potential lies in the generation of gamified evaluation tests and evaluation and qualification reports of the students required by the educational administrations. The work method has been the analysis of information, which has served to make an exhaustive description of these platforms with the aim of providing the teachers information and tools that enable them to use and implement ICT in the evaluation of musical content of the Primary Education curriculum. Finally, the conclusions related to the benefits and limitations of these digital tools when applied in the Music classroom are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Student assessment of their mathematical education in a postgraduate course in administration Effective Strategies for Finding Open Educational Resources in High School Education Policies for the Integration of ICT in the Mexican National Education System Gamification and ubiquitous learning in higher education: applying learning styles Educational computing to assess decision-making learning in university students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1