全髋关节置换术中脊柱-椎旁联合麻醉。

V. A. Koriachkin, M. A. Liskov, M. Maltsev, M. Mohanna
{"title":"全髋关节置换术中脊柱-椎旁联合麻醉。","authors":"V. A. Koriachkin, M. A. Liskov, M. Maltsev, M. Mohanna","doi":"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-357-360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nOptimizing analgesia in total hip arthroplasty contributed to the idea of combined use of spinal and paravertebral anesthesia.\n\n\nTHE AIM\nthe clinical evaluation of combined spinal-paravertebral anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip ar- throplasty.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n67 patients were divided into groups: at the first a combined spinal-paravertebral anesthesia (KSPA) was used, the second - a combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). The location of the lumbar plexus was determined by ultrasound scan. Spinal component was provided 0.5% ropivacaine solution. In the perioperative period propofol infusionfor sedation was used. After operation infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine solution at a rate of5-6 ml/hour was started through the catheter for 48 hours. The postoperative period was assessed pain intensity on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), the needfor analgesics, incidence of complications and patient satisfaction with the quality of anesthesia.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe lumbar plexus at the L2-3 level was in 29,9%- immediately after the release ofthe intervertebral holes, in 67.2%- in the psoas major muscle at L4-5 level of 80.1% in the psoas major muscle. In both groups postoperative pain intensity within 48 hours does not exceed 3, VAS scores. The frequency of complications in the postoperative period was against the background of paravertebral blockade of 18.2%, against the backdrop of epidural analgesia - 26 5%. 90.1% ofpatients in the first group and 82.4% ofpatients in the second group were fully satisfied with the chosen method of anesthesia (p> 0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nCombined spinal-paravertebral block for total hip arthroplasty is an effective and safe method of pain relief.","PeriodicalId":7795,"journal":{"name":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","volume":"3 1","pages":"357-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[COMBINED SPINAL-PARAVERTEBRAL ANESTHESIA IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.]\",\"authors\":\"V. A. Koriachkin, M. A. Liskov, M. Maltsev, M. Mohanna\",\"doi\":\"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-357-360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nOptimizing analgesia in total hip arthroplasty contributed to the idea of combined use of spinal and paravertebral anesthesia.\\n\\n\\nTHE AIM\\nthe clinical evaluation of combined spinal-paravertebral anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip ar- throplasty.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\n67 patients were divided into groups: at the first a combined spinal-paravertebral anesthesia (KSPA) was used, the second - a combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). The location of the lumbar plexus was determined by ultrasound scan. Spinal component was provided 0.5% ropivacaine solution. In the perioperative period propofol infusionfor sedation was used. After operation infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine solution at a rate of5-6 ml/hour was started through the catheter for 48 hours. The postoperative period was assessed pain intensity on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), the needfor analgesics, incidence of complications and patient satisfaction with the quality of anesthesia.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe lumbar plexus at the L2-3 level was in 29,9%- immediately after the release ofthe intervertebral holes, in 67.2%- in the psoas major muscle at L4-5 level of 80.1% in the psoas major muscle. In both groups postoperative pain intensity within 48 hours does not exceed 3, VAS scores. The frequency of complications in the postoperative period was against the background of paravertebral blockade of 18.2%, against the backdrop of epidural analgesia - 26 5%. 90.1% ofpatients in the first group and 82.4% ofpatients in the second group were fully satisfied with the chosen method of anesthesia (p> 0.05).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nCombined spinal-paravertebral block for total hip arthroplasty is an effective and safe method of pain relief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"357-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-357-360\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-357-360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:优化全髋关节置换术中的镇痛有助于脊柱和椎旁麻醉联合使用的想法。目的:探讨脊柱-椎旁联合麻醉在全髋关节置换术中的临床应用价值。材料与方法将67例患者分为两组:第一组采用脊髓-椎旁联合麻醉(KSPA),第二组采用脊髓-硬膜外联合麻醉(CSEA)。腰神经丛的位置通过超声扫描确定。脊柱组件提供0.5%罗哌卡因溶液。围手术期应用异丙酚输注镇静。术后开始通过导管以5-6 ml/h的速率输注0.2%罗哌卡因溶液,持续48小时。采用10分视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估术后疼痛强度、镇痛药需求、并发症发生率和患者对麻醉质量的满意度。结果腰丛在腰2-3水平占29.9%(椎间孔释放后即刻),在腰4-5水平占67.2%(腰大肌80.1%)。两组术后48小时内疼痛强度均不超过3,VAS评分。术后并发症发生率为椎旁阻滞18.2%,硬膜外镇痛26.5%。第一组90.1%的患者和第二组82.4%的患者对选择的麻醉方式完全满意(p> 0.05)。结论脊柱-椎旁阻滞联合全髋关节置换术是一种安全有效的镇痛方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[COMBINED SPINAL-PARAVERTEBRAL ANESTHESIA IN TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY.]
BACKGROUND Optimizing analgesia in total hip arthroplasty contributed to the idea of combined use of spinal and paravertebral anesthesia. THE AIM the clinical evaluation of combined spinal-paravertebral anesthesia in patients undergoing total hip ar- throplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS 67 patients were divided into groups: at the first a combined spinal-paravertebral anesthesia (KSPA) was used, the second - a combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA). The location of the lumbar plexus was determined by ultrasound scan. Spinal component was provided 0.5% ropivacaine solution. In the perioperative period propofol infusionfor sedation was used. After operation infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine solution at a rate of5-6 ml/hour was started through the catheter for 48 hours. The postoperative period was assessed pain intensity on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), the needfor analgesics, incidence of complications and patient satisfaction with the quality of anesthesia. RESULTS The lumbar plexus at the L2-3 level was in 29,9%- immediately after the release ofthe intervertebral holes, in 67.2%- in the psoas major muscle at L4-5 level of 80.1% in the psoas major muscle. In both groups postoperative pain intensity within 48 hours does not exceed 3, VAS scores. The frequency of complications in the postoperative period was against the background of paravertebral blockade of 18.2%, against the backdrop of epidural analgesia - 26 5%. 90.1% ofpatients in the first group and 82.4% ofpatients in the second group were fully satisfied with the chosen method of anesthesia (p> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Combined spinal-paravertebral block for total hip arthroplasty is an effective and safe method of pain relief.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[EPISTAXIS DURING NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION. ATTILA'S SYNDROME.] [PARTICIPATION OF AROMATIC MICROBIAL METABOLITES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEVERE INFECTION AND SEPSIS.] [PREDICTORS OF UNFAVORABLE OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH ABDOMINAL SEPSIS.] [THE CHOICE OF PERIOPERATIVE MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR HERNIATED DISC: THE PRELIMINARY RESULTS.] [MODERN VIEWS ON THE PHARMACOGENETICS OF PAIN.]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1