寄希望于后现代主义:为盲人和残障人士拯救斯坦利·蒂格曼的伊利诺伊州地区图书馆(1978)

IF 0.1 4区 艺术学 Q3 Arts and Humanities Future Anterior Pub Date : 2020-08-21 DOI:10.5749/futuante.16.1.0087
David Serlin
{"title":"寄希望于后现代主义:为盲人和残障人士拯救斯坦利·蒂格曼的伊利诺伊州地区图书馆(1978)","authors":"David Serlin","doi":"10.5749/futuante.16.1.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In 2012, the Illinois Regional Library for the Blind and Physically Handicapped in Chicago, designed in the 1970s by US architect Stanley Tigerman (1930–2019), was converted into the flagship offices of a regional bank. During its heyday, Tigerman’s library was widely recognized as an innovative example of empathic design that engaged the sensory and mobility impairments of its intended patrons. In its conversion to a bank, however, contemporary architects sought to capitalize upon the library as an eccentric icon of mid-1970s postmodernism. In the process, they jettisoned many notable features of Tigerman’s original design. This essay endeavors to show what was lost in the conversion, since the bank chose to preserve that which is most superficially associated with histories of postmodernism while erasing the library’s material commitments to histories of disability. By recovering the original context and guiding principles behind the library’s design and execution, the essay asserts the importance of thinking about disability within practices of historic preservation while also restoring Tigerman’s library to its rightful place within historical assessments of late-twentieth-century urban architecture.","PeriodicalId":53609,"journal":{"name":"Future Anterior","volume":"89 1","pages":"108 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Banking on Postmodernism: Saving Stanley Tigerman’s Illinois Regional Library for the Blind and Physically Handicapped (1978)\",\"authors\":\"David Serlin\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/futuante.16.1.0087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In 2012, the Illinois Regional Library for the Blind and Physically Handicapped in Chicago, designed in the 1970s by US architect Stanley Tigerman (1930–2019), was converted into the flagship offices of a regional bank. During its heyday, Tigerman’s library was widely recognized as an innovative example of empathic design that engaged the sensory and mobility impairments of its intended patrons. In its conversion to a bank, however, contemporary architects sought to capitalize upon the library as an eccentric icon of mid-1970s postmodernism. In the process, they jettisoned many notable features of Tigerman’s original design. This essay endeavors to show what was lost in the conversion, since the bank chose to preserve that which is most superficially associated with histories of postmodernism while erasing the library’s material commitments to histories of disability. By recovering the original context and guiding principles behind the library’s design and execution, the essay asserts the importance of thinking about disability within practices of historic preservation while also restoring Tigerman’s library to its rightful place within historical assessments of late-twentieth-century urban architecture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Anterior\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"108 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Anterior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.16.1.0087\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Anterior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/futuante.16.1.0087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:2012年,由美国建筑师Stanley Tigerman(1930-2019)于20世纪70年代设计的芝加哥伊利诺伊州盲人和残疾人地区图书馆被改造成一家地区银行的旗舰办公室。在其全盛时期,Tigerman的图书馆被广泛认为是移情设计的创新范例,它涉及到它的预定顾客的感官和行动障碍。然而,在将图书馆改造成银行的过程中,当代建筑师试图利用图书馆作为20世纪70年代中期后现代主义的古怪标志。在这个过程中,他们抛弃了Tigerman原始设计的许多显著特征。这篇文章试图展示在转换中失去了什么,因为银行选择保留最表面上与后现代主义历史相关的东西,同时抹去图书馆对残疾人历史的材料承诺。通过恢复图书馆设计和执行背后的原始环境和指导原则,文章强调了在历史保护实践中考虑残疾的重要性,同时也将Tigerman图书馆恢复到20世纪后期城市建筑的历史评估中应有的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Banking on Postmodernism: Saving Stanley Tigerman’s Illinois Regional Library for the Blind and Physically Handicapped (1978)
Abstract:In 2012, the Illinois Regional Library for the Blind and Physically Handicapped in Chicago, designed in the 1970s by US architect Stanley Tigerman (1930–2019), was converted into the flagship offices of a regional bank. During its heyday, Tigerman’s library was widely recognized as an innovative example of empathic design that engaged the sensory and mobility impairments of its intended patrons. In its conversion to a bank, however, contemporary architects sought to capitalize upon the library as an eccentric icon of mid-1970s postmodernism. In the process, they jettisoned many notable features of Tigerman’s original design. This essay endeavors to show what was lost in the conversion, since the bank chose to preserve that which is most superficially associated with histories of postmodernism while erasing the library’s material commitments to histories of disability. By recovering the original context and guiding principles behind the library’s design and execution, the essay asserts the importance of thinking about disability within practices of historic preservation while also restoring Tigerman’s library to its rightful place within historical assessments of late-twentieth-century urban architecture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future Anterior
Future Anterior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Life and Death of Skanderbeg Square: A Chronicle of an Undoing Foretold, in a Hundred Years Slightly Disappointing Ruins and the Facades of Tourist Imagery Dirty Industry, Heritage, and the Erasure of Immigrant Pasts The Necessary Interlinking of Culture and Climate Change Heritage Conservation in Postcolonial India: Approaches and Challenges ed. by Manish Chalana and Ashima Krishna (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1