巴西年轻工人阶级妇女“高危”怀孕的卫生法规和社会经验

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Risk & Society Pub Date : 2019-05-19 DOI:10.1080/13698575.2019.1638890
Alfonsina Faya Robles
{"title":"巴西年轻工人阶级妇女“高危”怀孕的卫生法规和社会经验","authors":"Alfonsina Faya Robles","doi":"10.1080/13698575.2019.1638890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In conjunction with aims to reduce infant and maternal mortality, antenatal care in Brazil is based on risk assessment and monitoring. Exploring the reliance of pregnancy management policies on a distinction between ‘low’ and ‘high-risk’ pregnancies, I conducted two ethnographic studies of pregnant women from a working-class background in Recife and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In addition to in-depth interviews with women and professionals, observations were made in public maternity wards and neighbourhood health units. With an approach focused on notions of governance and subjectivity, my data show that risk becomes not only a technique for regulating pregnancies, but also an important dimension of the reproductive experience of women. However, tensions appear between these two dimensions (regulation and experience) of risk. An analysis of my data sheds light on three tensions in particular. Firstly, the notion of risk appears to be a cultural resource for health professionals to transmit norms of parenthood to certain categories of women. Secondly, it allows for distinctions between two registers of care: medicalisation and healthisation. While on one hand the risk approach is aligned with a process of technicisation and pathologisation of pregnancies, it also introduces behavioural and psycho-social perspectives on pregnancy. Thirdly, the risk approach promotes an individualising tendency in the management of pregnancy. Women’s experiences lead them to make pragmatic adjustments to regulations. Women circumvent certain norms and easily articulate the registers of medicalisation and healthisation according to the situation, simultaneously incorporating their experience of risk in a social network of mutual help. This article thus shows that the analysis of pregnancy risk management must take into consideration the difference between expectations regarding the effect of regulations implemented by institutions and the de facto experience of women in a specific socio-cultural context.","PeriodicalId":47341,"journal":{"name":"Health Risk & Society","volume":"41 1","pages":"100 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health regulations and social experiences of ‘high-risk’ pregnancies among young working-class women in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Alfonsina Faya Robles\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13698575.2019.1638890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In conjunction with aims to reduce infant and maternal mortality, antenatal care in Brazil is based on risk assessment and monitoring. Exploring the reliance of pregnancy management policies on a distinction between ‘low’ and ‘high-risk’ pregnancies, I conducted two ethnographic studies of pregnant women from a working-class background in Recife and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In addition to in-depth interviews with women and professionals, observations were made in public maternity wards and neighbourhood health units. With an approach focused on notions of governance and subjectivity, my data show that risk becomes not only a technique for regulating pregnancies, but also an important dimension of the reproductive experience of women. However, tensions appear between these two dimensions (regulation and experience) of risk. An analysis of my data sheds light on three tensions in particular. Firstly, the notion of risk appears to be a cultural resource for health professionals to transmit norms of parenthood to certain categories of women. Secondly, it allows for distinctions between two registers of care: medicalisation and healthisation. While on one hand the risk approach is aligned with a process of technicisation and pathologisation of pregnancies, it also introduces behavioural and psycho-social perspectives on pregnancy. Thirdly, the risk approach promotes an individualising tendency in the management of pregnancy. Women’s experiences lead them to make pragmatic adjustments to regulations. Women circumvent certain norms and easily articulate the registers of medicalisation and healthisation according to the situation, simultaneously incorporating their experience of risk in a social network of mutual help. This article thus shows that the analysis of pregnancy risk management must take into consideration the difference between expectations regarding the effect of regulations implemented by institutions and the de facto experience of women in a specific socio-cultural context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Risk & Society\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Risk & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2019.1638890\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Risk & Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2019.1638890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

结合降低婴儿和孕产妇死亡率的目标,巴西的产前保健以风险评估和监测为基础。为了探索怀孕管理政策对“低”和“高风险”怀孕区别的依赖,我对巴西累西腓和里约热内卢工人阶级背景的孕妇进行了两项人种学研究。除了对妇女和专业人员进行深入访谈外,还在公共产科病房和社区保健单位进行了观察。通过关注治理和主观性概念的方法,我的数据表明,风险不仅成为调节怀孕的一种技术,而且成为妇女生殖经验的一个重要方面。然而,风险的这两个维度(监管和经验)之间出现了紧张关系。对我的数据的分析特别揭示了三种紧张关系。首先,风险概念似乎是保健专业人员向某些类别的妇女传播为人父母规范的一种文化资源。其次,它允许区分两种护理登记:医疗化和健康化。一方面,风险方法与怀孕的技术化和病理化过程相一致,它还介绍了怀孕的行为和心理社会观点。第三,风险方法促进了妊娠管理的个体化趋势。妇女的经验使她们对规章制度作出务实的调整。妇女绕过某些规范,根据情况很容易地进行医疗和健康登记,同时将她们的风险经历纳入互助的社会网络。因此,本文表明,对怀孕风险管理的分析必须考虑到对机构执行的条例效果的期望与特定社会文化背景下妇女的实际经验之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health regulations and social experiences of ‘high-risk’ pregnancies among young working-class women in Brazil
In conjunction with aims to reduce infant and maternal mortality, antenatal care in Brazil is based on risk assessment and monitoring. Exploring the reliance of pregnancy management policies on a distinction between ‘low’ and ‘high-risk’ pregnancies, I conducted two ethnographic studies of pregnant women from a working-class background in Recife and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In addition to in-depth interviews with women and professionals, observations were made in public maternity wards and neighbourhood health units. With an approach focused on notions of governance and subjectivity, my data show that risk becomes not only a technique for regulating pregnancies, but also an important dimension of the reproductive experience of women. However, tensions appear between these two dimensions (regulation and experience) of risk. An analysis of my data sheds light on three tensions in particular. Firstly, the notion of risk appears to be a cultural resource for health professionals to transmit norms of parenthood to certain categories of women. Secondly, it allows for distinctions between two registers of care: medicalisation and healthisation. While on one hand the risk approach is aligned with a process of technicisation and pathologisation of pregnancies, it also introduces behavioural and psycho-social perspectives on pregnancy. Thirdly, the risk approach promotes an individualising tendency in the management of pregnancy. Women’s experiences lead them to make pragmatic adjustments to regulations. Women circumvent certain norms and easily articulate the registers of medicalisation and healthisation according to the situation, simultaneously incorporating their experience of risk in a social network of mutual help. This article thus shows that the analysis of pregnancy risk management must take into consideration the difference between expectations regarding the effect of regulations implemented by institutions and the de facto experience of women in a specific socio-cultural context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Health Risk & Society is an international scholarly journal devoted to a theoretical and empirical understanding of the social processes which influence the ways in which health risks are taken, communicated, assessed and managed. Public awareness of risk is associated with the development of high profile media debates about specific risks. Although risk issues arise in a variety of areas, such as technological usage and the environment, they are particularly evident in health. Not only is health a major issue of personal and collective concern, but failure to effectively assess and manage risk is likely to result in health problems.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for mental health and wellness: children’s perspectives from five Majority World Countries The role of trust in government and risk perception in adherence to COVID-19 prevention measures: survey findings among young people in Luxembourg Reassessing social trust: gossip, self-policing, and Covid-19 risk communication in Norway Organisational learning, or organised irresponsibility? Risk, opacity and lesson learning about mental health related deaths The “risk object” of cannabis edibles: perspectives from young adults in Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1