继续与Ward等人的对话(2022):对认识论基础问题的不同方法的一些思考

IF 1.6 3区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Quest Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/00336297.2022.2058566

E. Backman, D. Barker

{"title":"继续与Ward等人的对话(2022):对认识论基础问题的不同方法的一些思考","authors":"E. Backman, D. Barker","doi":"10.1080/00336297.2022.2058566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper is a comment to Ward et al. (2020) on the response to a previous paper in which we elaborate on a phronetic perspective on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in physical education. In our previous paper, we point to what we see as limitations in PCK-work in physical education. In their response, Ward et al. (2022) argue that we have misrepresented their research as well as the behaviorist epistemology. In this comment, we acknowledge distinctions in PCK-research that were not captured in our original paper. We also argue for why our understanding of the PCK-research was based on interpretations rather than a case of misrepresentation. Further, we argue for the constant acknowledgment of ideology in research. Finally, we discuss the need for clarity regarding the meaning of performance when viewed as content knowledge.","PeriodicalId":49642,"journal":{"name":"Quest","volume":"15 1","pages":"335 - 338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuing the Conversation with Ward et al. (2022): Some Thoughts on Different Approaches to Epistemologically Grounded Questions\",\"authors\":\"E. Backman, D. Barker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00336297.2022.2058566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper is a comment to Ward et al. (2020) on the response to a previous paper in which we elaborate on a phronetic perspective on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in physical education. In our previous paper, we point to what we see as limitations in PCK-work in physical education. In their response, Ward et al. (2022) argue that we have misrepresented their research as well as the behaviorist epistemology. In this comment, we acknowledge distinctions in PCK-research that were not captured in our original paper. We also argue for why our understanding of the PCK-research was based on interpretations rather than a case of misrepresentation. Further, we argue for the constant acknowledgment of ideology in research. Finally, we discuss the need for clarity regarding the meaning of performance when viewed as content knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quest\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"335 - 338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2058566\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quest","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2022.2058566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文是对Ward等人(2020)对上一篇论文的回应的评论，在上一篇论文中，我们阐述了体育教学中教学内容知识(PCK)的语素视角。在我们之前的论文中，我们指出了我们所看到的PCK-work在体育教育中的局限性。在他们的回应中，Ward等人(2022)认为我们歪曲了他们的研究以及行为主义认识论。在此评论中，我们承认pck研究中的差异，这些差异在我们的原始论文中没有被捕获。我们还讨论了为什么我们对pck研究的理解是基于解释而不是误传的情况。此外，我们主张在研究中不断承认意识形态。最后，我们讨论了当被视为内容知识时，需要明确性能的含义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Continuing the Conversation with Ward et al. (2022): Some Thoughts on Different Approaches to Epistemologically Grounded Questions

ABSTRACT This paper is a comment to Ward et al. (2020) on the response to a previous paper in which we elaborate on a phronetic perspective on pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in physical education. In our previous paper, we point to what we see as limitations in PCK-work in physical education. In their response, Ward et al. (2022) argue that we have misrepresented their research as well as the behaviorist epistemology. In this comment, we acknowledge distinctions in PCK-research that were not captured in our original paper. We also argue for why our understanding of the PCK-research was based on interpretations rather than a case of misrepresentation. Further, we argue for the constant acknowledgment of ideology in research. Finally, we discuss the need for clarity regarding the meaning of performance when viewed as content knowledge.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Quest 社会科学-运动科学

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Quest is the official journal of the National Association for Kinesiology in Higher Education (NAKHE). It is the leading journal for interdisciplinary scholarship for professionals in kinesiology in higher education. Quest provides a public forum for scholarship, creative thought, and research relevant to a broad range of interests held by faculty and leaders in higher education today. Quest publishes: 1) manuscripts that address issues and concerns relevant and meaningful to the field of kinesiology; 2) original research reports that address empirical questions that are contextualized within higher education and hold significance to a broad range of faculty and administrators in kinesiology; and 3) reviews of literature and/or research of interest to one or more sub-disciplines in kinesiology. Quest does not publish papers focused on sport (e.g., amateur, collegiate, professional) that are contextualized outside of kinesiology in higher education.