文献计量学与五旬节派学术

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION Pneuma Pub Date : 2023-06-12 DOI:10.1163/15700747-bja10084
Daniel W. Eller, Daniel D. Isgrigg
{"title":"文献计量学与五旬节派学术","authors":"Daniel W. Eller, Daniel D. Isgrigg","doi":"10.1163/15700747-bja10084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Society for Pentecostal Studies celebrated its fiftieth anniversary in 2020. To commemorate the half-century mark, the editors of Pneuma assembled a special issue that included a history of the Society. While the fiftieth-anniversary commemorative volume captured the growth of the Society, absent was a consideration of the impact of Pneuma. As such, the fifty-year anniversary deserves a more quantifiable discussion of the journal’s impact on scholarship. By using a combination of information science and theological reflection, this article offers fresh insights on the journal’s impact in the realm of scholarly publishing. It fleshes out significant theological trends in Pentecostalism covered in its fifty-year history using bibliometrics. An index of all 710 peer-reviewed research articles published from 1978 to 2022 was created. Bibliometrics were used to assess that scholarship’s impact, understand where pentecostal studies flourished, and uncover possible gaps in pentecostal research where further study may be needed. Bibliometric research in theological studies acts as a mirror for researchers by quantifiably reflecting trends in pentecostal research that may have been anecdotally assumed or overlooked altogether. It places possible bias into sharp focus and offers new tools for discussing sensitive research and publication issues such as gender politics, diversity, and inclusivity.","PeriodicalId":43699,"journal":{"name":"Pneuma","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometrics and Pentecostal Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"Daniel W. Eller, Daniel D. Isgrigg\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15700747-bja10084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Society for Pentecostal Studies celebrated its fiftieth anniversary in 2020. To commemorate the half-century mark, the editors of Pneuma assembled a special issue that included a history of the Society. While the fiftieth-anniversary commemorative volume captured the growth of the Society, absent was a consideration of the impact of Pneuma. As such, the fifty-year anniversary deserves a more quantifiable discussion of the journal’s impact on scholarship. By using a combination of information science and theological reflection, this article offers fresh insights on the journal’s impact in the realm of scholarly publishing. It fleshes out significant theological trends in Pentecostalism covered in its fifty-year history using bibliometrics. An index of all 710 peer-reviewed research articles published from 1978 to 2022 was created. Bibliometrics were used to assess that scholarship’s impact, understand where pentecostal studies flourished, and uncover possible gaps in pentecostal research where further study may be needed. Bibliometric research in theological studies acts as a mirror for researchers by quantifiably reflecting trends in pentecostal research that may have been anecdotally assumed or overlooked altogether. It places possible bias into sharp focus and offers new tools for discussing sensitive research and publication issues such as gender politics, diversity, and inclusivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pneuma\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pneuma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700747-bja10084\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneuma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15700747-bja10084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

五旬节派研究协会在2020年庆祝了其成立五十周年。为了纪念成立半个世纪,《Pneuma》的编辑们制作了一期特刊,介绍了学会的历史。虽然五十周年纪念册记录了学会的成长,但没有考虑到肺炎的影响。因此,五十周年纪念值得对该期刊对学术的影响进行更量化的讨论。本文运用信息科学与神学反思相结合的方法,对该期刊在学术出版领域的影响提供了新的见解。它充实了五旬节派在其五十年历史中使用文献计量学的重要神学趋势。创建了一个索引,收录了1978年至2022年发表的所有710篇同行评议的研究文章。文献计量学被用来评估学术的影响,了解五旬节派研究在哪里蓬勃发展,并发现五旬节派研究中可能存在的差距,这些差距可能需要进一步的研究。神学研究中的文献计量学研究作为研究人员的一面镜子,通过定量地反映五旬节派研究的趋势,这些趋势可能被轶事地假设或完全忽视。它使可能存在的偏见成为焦点,并为讨论性别政治、多样性和包容性等敏感研究和出版问题提供了新的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bibliometrics and Pentecostal Scholarship
The Society for Pentecostal Studies celebrated its fiftieth anniversary in 2020. To commemorate the half-century mark, the editors of Pneuma assembled a special issue that included a history of the Society. While the fiftieth-anniversary commemorative volume captured the growth of the Society, absent was a consideration of the impact of Pneuma. As such, the fifty-year anniversary deserves a more quantifiable discussion of the journal’s impact on scholarship. By using a combination of information science and theological reflection, this article offers fresh insights on the journal’s impact in the realm of scholarly publishing. It fleshes out significant theological trends in Pentecostalism covered in its fifty-year history using bibliometrics. An index of all 710 peer-reviewed research articles published from 1978 to 2022 was created. Bibliometrics were used to assess that scholarship’s impact, understand where pentecostal studies flourished, and uncover possible gaps in pentecostal research where further study may be needed. Bibliometric research in theological studies acts as a mirror for researchers by quantifiably reflecting trends in pentecostal research that may have been anecdotally assumed or overlooked altogether. It places possible bias into sharp focus and offers new tools for discussing sensitive research and publication issues such as gender politics, diversity, and inclusivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pneuma
Pneuma RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Commission, Mission and Migration in Acts Is Acts Really “The Most Overtly Missionary Book”? Reading the Pentecostal Interpretations of the Book of Acts Contrapuntally Tongues of Fire: Giving Voice to Pentecostal Theology Vindicating Spirit, Deceiving Spirits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1