{"title":"奥克汉姆的威廉论未来的偶然性","authors":"P. Øhrstrøm, David Jakobsen","doi":"10.1163/15685241-12341413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his philosophy, William of Ockham (1285-1347) offered an important and detailed response to the classical argument from the truth of a statement regarding the future to the necessity (unpreventability) of the statement. In this paper, Ockham’s solution and the possible formalisation of it are discussed in terms of modern tense and modal logic. In particular, the famous branching time formalisation suggested by A. N. Prior (1914-19) is discussed. Weaknesses and problems with this suggestion are pointed out, and an alternative formalisation of Ockham’s solution without the use of branching time is presented.","PeriodicalId":41736,"journal":{"name":"KronoScope-Journal for the Study of Time","volume":"102 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"William of Ockham on Future Contingency\",\"authors\":\"P. Øhrstrøm, David Jakobsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685241-12341413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his philosophy, William of Ockham (1285-1347) offered an important and detailed response to the classical argument from the truth of a statement regarding the future to the necessity (unpreventability) of the statement. In this paper, Ockham’s solution and the possible formalisation of it are discussed in terms of modern tense and modal logic. In particular, the famous branching time formalisation suggested by A. N. Prior (1914-19) is discussed. Weaknesses and problems with this suggestion are pointed out, and an alternative formalisation of Ockham’s solution without the use of branching time is presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KronoScope-Journal for the Study of Time\",\"volume\":\"102 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KronoScope-Journal for the Study of Time\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685241-12341413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KronoScope-Journal for the Study of Time","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685241-12341413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在他的哲学中，William of Ockham(1285-1347)提供了一个重要而详细的回应，从关于未来的陈述的真实性到陈述的必要性(不可预防性)的经典论点。本文从现代时态和模态逻辑的角度讨论了奥卡姆的解及其可能的形式化。特别地，讨论了由A. N. Prior(1914-19)提出的著名的分支时间形式化。指出了这种建议的缺点和问题，并提出了不使用分支时间的Ockham解决方案的另一种形式化形式。
In his philosophy, William of Ockham (1285-1347) offered an important and detailed response to the classical argument from the truth of a statement regarding the future to the necessity (unpreventability) of the statement. In this paper, Ockham’s solution and the possible formalisation of it are discussed in terms of modern tense and modal logic. In particular, the famous branching time formalisation suggested by A. N. Prior (1914-19) is discussed. Weaknesses and problems with this suggestion are pointed out, and an alternative formalisation of Ockham’s solution without the use of branching time is presented.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
