基于紧急等级分类方法的电子商务产品评论排序

H. Zuhri, N. Maulidevi
{"title":"基于紧急等级分类方法的电子商务产品评论排序","authors":"H. Zuhri, N. Maulidevi","doi":"10.15575/JOIN.V5I2.612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Review ranking is useful to give users a better experience. Review ranking studies commonly use upvote value, which does not represent urgency, and it causes problems in prediction. In contrast, manual labeling as wide as the upvote value range provides a high bias and inconsistency. The proposed solution is to use a classification approach to rank the review where the labels are ordinal urgency class. The experiment involved shallow learning models (Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayesian, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest), and deep learning models (LSTM and CNN). In constructing a classification model, the problem is broken down into several binary classifications that predict tendencies of urgency depending on the separation of classes. The result shows that deep learning models outperform other models in classification dan ranking evaluation. In addition, the review data used tend to contain vocabulary of certain product domains, so further research is needed on data with more diverse vocabulary.","PeriodicalId":32019,"journal":{"name":"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Product Review Ranking in e-Commerce using Urgency Level Classification Approach\",\"authors\":\"H. Zuhri, N. Maulidevi\",\"doi\":\"10.15575/JOIN.V5I2.612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Review ranking is useful to give users a better experience. Review ranking studies commonly use upvote value, which does not represent urgency, and it causes problems in prediction. In contrast, manual labeling as wide as the upvote value range provides a high bias and inconsistency. The proposed solution is to use a classification approach to rank the review where the labels are ordinal urgency class. The experiment involved shallow learning models (Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayesian, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest), and deep learning models (LSTM and CNN). In constructing a classification model, the problem is broken down into several binary classifications that predict tendencies of urgency depending on the separation of classes. The result shows that deep learning models outperform other models in classification dan ranking evaluation. In addition, the review data used tend to contain vocabulary of certain product domains, so further research is needed on data with more diverse vocabulary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15575/JOIN.V5I2.612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOIN Jurnal Online Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/JOIN.V5I2.612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评论排名能够帮助用户获得更好的体验。评论排名研究通常使用upvote值,这并不代表紧迫性,并且会导致预测问题。相比之下,与upvote值范围一样宽的手动标记提供了高偏差和不一致性。建议的解决方案是使用分类方法对标签为有序紧急类的评论进行排序。实验涉及浅层学习模型(逻辑回归、Naïve贝叶斯、支持向量机和随机森林)和深度学习模型(LSTM和CNN)。在构建分类模型时,将问题分解为几个二元分类,根据类的分离来预测紧迫性的趋势。结果表明,深度学习模型在分类和排序评价方面优于其他模型。此外,所使用的评论数据往往包含某些产品领域的词汇,因此需要进一步研究更多样化的词汇数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Product Review Ranking in e-Commerce using Urgency Level Classification Approach
Review ranking is useful to give users a better experience. Review ranking studies commonly use upvote value, which does not represent urgency, and it causes problems in prediction. In contrast, manual labeling as wide as the upvote value range provides a high bias and inconsistency. The proposed solution is to use a classification approach to rank the review where the labels are ordinal urgency class. The experiment involved shallow learning models (Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayesian, Support Vector Machine, and Random Forest), and deep learning models (LSTM and CNN). In constructing a classification model, the problem is broken down into several binary classifications that predict tendencies of urgency depending on the separation of classes. The result shows that deep learning models outperform other models in classification dan ranking evaluation. In addition, the review data used tend to contain vocabulary of certain product domains, so further research is needed on data with more diverse vocabulary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Malware Image Classification Using Deep Learning InceptionResNet-V2 and VGG-16 Method Texture Analysis of Citrus Leaf Images Using BEMD for Huanglongbing Disease Diagnosis Implementation of Ant Colony Optimization – Artificial Neural Network in Predicting the Activity of Indenopyrazole Derivative as Anti-Cancer Agent The Implementation of Restricted Boltzmann Machine in Choosing a Specialization for Informatics Students Digital Image Processing Using YCbCr Colour Space and Neuro Fuzzy to Identify Pornography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1