如果一开始你没有成功,试着关闭另一个评估循环:实施在线联合课程评估

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Open Praxis Pub Date : 2020-09-30 DOI:10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1093
Heather D. Hussey, Ashley Babcock, Tara J. Lehan
{"title":"如果一开始你没有成功,试着关闭另一个评估循环:实施在线联合课程评估","authors":"Heather D. Hussey, Ashley Babcock, Tara J. Lehan","doi":"10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Higher education institutions are commonly tasked with demonstrating student learning in and out of the classroom. Although academic and student affairs share a common goal of supporting student success, they frequently do not speak the same assessment language. This lack of alignment can lead to miscommunication and missed opportunities to collaboratively promote learning and achievement. Further, it can be a struggle to implement assessment protocols if institutional stakeholders do not value and believe in the importance of their role in the assessment process. In this paper, we discuss how professionals at an online academic success center used the Theory of Planned Behavior to inform and improve an assessment protocol as part of the institution’s overall assessment plan. The steps and strategies used over multiple assessment loops are discussed to demonstrate the path taken to build a collaborative learning environment for students in and out of the online classroom.","PeriodicalId":45611,"journal":{"name":"Open Praxis","volume":"18 1","pages":"425-436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"If at First You Don’t Succeed, Try Closing Another Assessment Loop: Implementing Online Co-Curricular Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Heather D. Hussey, Ashley Babcock, Tara J. Lehan\",\"doi\":\"10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Higher education institutions are commonly tasked with demonstrating student learning in and out of the classroom. Although academic and student affairs share a common goal of supporting student success, they frequently do not speak the same assessment language. This lack of alignment can lead to miscommunication and missed opportunities to collaboratively promote learning and achievement. Further, it can be a struggle to implement assessment protocols if institutional stakeholders do not value and believe in the importance of their role in the assessment process. In this paper, we discuss how professionals at an online academic success center used the Theory of Planned Behavior to inform and improve an assessment protocol as part of the institution’s overall assessment plan. The steps and strategies used over multiple assessment loops are discussed to demonstrate the path taken to build a collaborative learning environment for students in and out of the online classroom.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Praxis\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"425-436\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.3.1093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高等教育机构的任务通常是展示学生在课堂内外的学习情况。虽然学术和学生事务都有一个共同的目标,那就是支持学生的成功,但他们经常不使用相同的评估语言。这种缺乏一致性会导致沟通不畅,并错失合作促进学习和成就的机会。此外,如果机构利益相关者不重视并相信他们在评估过程中角色的重要性,那么实施评估协议可能是一场斗争。在本文中,我们讨论了在线学术成功中心的专业人员如何使用计划行为理论来通知和改进作为机构整体评估计划一部分的评估协议。讨论了在多个评估循环中使用的步骤和策略,以演示为在线课堂内外的学生构建协作学习环境所采取的路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
If at First You Don’t Succeed, Try Closing Another Assessment Loop: Implementing Online Co-Curricular Assessment
Higher education institutions are commonly tasked with demonstrating student learning in and out of the classroom. Although academic and student affairs share a common goal of supporting student success, they frequently do not speak the same assessment language. This lack of alignment can lead to miscommunication and missed opportunities to collaboratively promote learning and achievement. Further, it can be a struggle to implement assessment protocols if institutional stakeholders do not value and believe in the importance of their role in the assessment process. In this paper, we discuss how professionals at an online academic success center used the Theory of Planned Behavior to inform and improve an assessment protocol as part of the institution’s overall assessment plan. The steps and strategies used over multiple assessment loops are discussed to demonstrate the path taken to build a collaborative learning environment for students in and out of the online classroom.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Praxis
Open Praxis EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Intergovernmental Organisations (IGOs) and Governmental Open Educational Resources (OER) Policies: Instruments of International Policy Influence The Cost of Success: Exploring the Impact of Textbook Costs at a Hispanic-Serving R1 Institution Open Pedagogy Benefits and Challenges: Student Perceptions of Writing Open Case Studies Generative AI, Synthetic Contents, Open Educational Resources (OER), and Open Educational Practices (OEP): A New Front in the Openness Landscape Reusing Distance Courseware to Enable Blended Delivery: A New Zealand Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1