建筑环境绩效评估工具中的采光和视觉舒适度:综述

Christina Giarma, Katerina Tsikaloudaki, Dimitris Aravantinos
{"title":"建筑环境绩效评估工具中的采光和视觉舒适度:综述","authors":"Christina Giarma,&nbsp;Katerina Tsikaloudaki,&nbsp;Dimitris Aravantinos","doi":"10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, some well-known buildings’ environmental performance assessment tools and methods are reviewed with regard to the consideration of visual comfort in their structure and assessment process. Specifically, the parameters used for visual comfort's assessment in widely used tools (BREEAM, LEED, SBTool and CASBEE - versions for office buildings) are examined; the type and the kind of criteria used for the assessment, the weightings applied and references to relative standards are reviewed and comparatively assessed. Although the presented results cover the issue of visual comfort as a whole, emphasis is given on daylighting–related factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20460,"journal":{"name":"Procedia environmental sciences","volume":"38 ","pages":"Pages 522-529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.116","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Daylighting and Visual Comfort in Buildings’ Environmental Performance Assessment Tools: A Critical Review\",\"authors\":\"Christina Giarma,&nbsp;Katerina Tsikaloudaki,&nbsp;Dimitris Aravantinos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, some well-known buildings’ environmental performance assessment tools and methods are reviewed with regard to the consideration of visual comfort in their structure and assessment process. Specifically, the parameters used for visual comfort's assessment in widely used tools (BREEAM, LEED, SBTool and CASBEE - versions for office buildings) are examined; the type and the kind of criteria used for the assessment, the weightings applied and references to relative standards are reviewed and comparatively assessed. Although the presented results cover the issue of visual comfort as a whole, emphasis is given on daylighting–related factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedia environmental sciences\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 522-529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.116\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedia environmental sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878029617301202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878029617301202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

本文从建筑结构和评价过程中对视觉舒适性的考虑出发,对一些知名建筑的环境性能评价工具和方法进行了综述。具体而言,研究了广泛使用的工具(BREEAM, LEED, SBTool和CASBEE -办公大楼版本)中用于视觉舒适性评估的参数;对评估所用标准的类型和种类、所采用的权重以及对相关标准的参考进行了审查和比较评估。虽然所提出的结果涵盖了视觉舒适作为一个整体的问题,重点是在采光相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Daylighting and Visual Comfort in Buildings’ Environmental Performance Assessment Tools: A Critical Review

In this paper, some well-known buildings’ environmental performance assessment tools and methods are reviewed with regard to the consideration of visual comfort in their structure and assessment process. Specifically, the parameters used for visual comfort's assessment in widely used tools (BREEAM, LEED, SBTool and CASBEE - versions for office buildings) are examined; the type and the kind of criteria used for the assessment, the weightings applied and references to relative standards are reviewed and comparatively assessed. Although the presented results cover the issue of visual comfort as a whole, emphasis is given on daylighting–related factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Editorial Review of the Greek Legislative Framework for Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHPs) and Suggestions for its Improvement Affordable and Common Modes of Transportation in Developing Cities and Their Effect on the Sustainability of Streets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1