关于认定所有权缺失请求的诉讼时效

T. Podshivalov
{"title":"关于认定所有权缺失请求的诉讼时效","authors":"T. Podshivalov","doi":"10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-12-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the jurisprudence regarding the decision on the applicability of the statute of limitations to the claim for recognition of property rights as absent. The resolution of the stated dilemma is built by identifying the characteristic features of the claim for recognition of property rights as absent. It is concluded that the statute of limitations does not apply to a claim recognizing property rights as absent, since this requirement is aimed at challenging the registered right to immovable things, and by virtue of Art. 195 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the statute of limitations applies only to claims based on a violation of the law, and not a dispute.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Limitation of Action in Respect of the Claim for Deeming a Proprietary Right to Be Absent\",\"authors\":\"T. Podshivalov\",\"doi\":\"10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-12-15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article analyzes the jurisprudence regarding the decision on the applicability of the statute of limitations to the claim for recognition of property rights as absent. The resolution of the stated dilemma is built by identifying the characteristic features of the claim for recognition of property rights as absent. It is concluded that the statute of limitations does not apply to a claim recognizing property rights as absent, since this requirement is aimed at challenging the registered right to immovable things, and by virtue of Art. 195 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the statute of limitations applies only to claims based on a violation of the law, and not a dispute.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-12-15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/2070-2140-2020-6-12-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了我国关于财产权利承认请求权是否适用诉讼时效的判例。要解决上述困境,就必须确定产权承认请求权的特征是缺席的。结论是,诉讼时效不适用于承认财产权不存在的请求,因为这一要求的目的是挑战对不动产的登记权利,而且根据俄罗斯联邦民法典第195条,诉讼时效只适用于基于违反法律的请求,而不适用于争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Limitation of Action in Respect of the Claim for Deeming a Proprietary Right to Be Absent
The article analyzes the jurisprudence regarding the decision on the applicability of the statute of limitations to the claim for recognition of property rights as absent. The resolution of the stated dilemma is built by identifying the characteristic features of the claim for recognition of property rights as absent. It is concluded that the statute of limitations does not apply to a claim recognizing property rights as absent, since this requirement is aimed at challenging the registered right to immovable things, and by virtue of Art. 195 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the statute of limitations applies only to claims based on a violation of the law, and not a dispute.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.
期刊最新文献
ON THE IMPACT OF THE REGISTRATION SYSTEM OF THE REAL ESTATE TURNOVER THE PRICIPLES OF CIVIL LIABILITY (finale) ON THE DEFECTS OF THE DEFINITION OF THE CONCEPT “LAND PLOT” IN THE FEDERAL LAW NO. 430-FZ INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC AND PRACTICAL CONFERENCE “RECENT HISTORY OF PRIVATE LAW: TO THE 30TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE RESEARCH CENTRE” THE IMPUTATION OF HARM TO A PERSON WHO IS ECONOMICALLY EASIER TO BEAR ITS CONSEQUENCES AS AN ARGUMENT FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF ALTERNATIVE CAUSATION IN TORT LAW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1