了解筛管下入井时的流体交换,降低地层和完井损害风险

M. Byrne, L. Djayapertapa, K. Watson, N. Fleming, K. Taugbøl
{"title":"了解筛管下入井时的流体交换,降低地层和完井损害风险","authors":"M. Byrne, L. Djayapertapa, K. Watson, N. Fleming, K. Taugbøl","doi":"10.2118/208852-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n To reduce the risk of screen plugging with drilling fluid solids, wellbore fluids are typically displaced to low or no solids systems before sand screen lower completions are run in to wells. Displacing the entire wellbore volume to low solids fluids can add significant cost particularly in high pressure wells. An option can be to displace the open hole section of the well only with the low solids fluid and run the lower completion through the original drilling fluid. A refinement of this process is to fill the upper hole section with the low solids fluid in order to pre-saturate the screens assembly. The movement or exchange of the two fluids as the screens are run in to the wellbore has been a significant uncertainty, until now!\n This work was conducted to investigate the potential for fluids to exchange as sand screen completions are run in to wells in the Field 1 Satellite and Field 2 developments. The hypothesis that fluids in the wellbore would displace fluids inside the screen assembly as the screens are run in to the well was tested. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling was used to simulate the movement of the lower completion in to the well and determine the rate and quantity of fluid exchange.\n The simulations demonstrated that when stand alone screen (SAS) completions are run in to wellbores, fluids will exchange from outside to inside the screens. This process happens at all tripping speeds examined and in all parts of the cased and open hole wellbore. The fluid exchange continues throughout the running in process, including in the open hole lower completion. There is no value in filling the top hole section with low solids completion fluid unless fluid exchange during running in can be controlled. When a one-way inflow control device (ICD) check valve is fitted to each screen joint allowing fluid to flow in to the tubing but not back out to the annulus then fluid exchange is significantly limited.\n Careful consideration should be given to the exchange of fluids as lower completion assemblies are run in to wells. If it is considered undesirable that the fluid in the well should enter the lower completion string as it is run in to the well then appropriate valves or flow reduction should be considered. Eliminating the requirement to fill the top hole section with low solids fluid can lead to significant cost reduction in well where expensive fluids, such as Cs formate, are required to meet the low or no solids specifications. Understanding fluid exchange in wells as screens are run in can significantly reduce the risk of formation/completion damage. The work illustrates the value in a novel application of CFD to determine the optimum well construction process.","PeriodicalId":10891,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, February 24, 2022","volume":"137 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Fluid Exchange as Screens are Run in Hole – Mitigation of Formation and Completion Damage Risks\",\"authors\":\"M. Byrne, L. Djayapertapa, K. Watson, N. Fleming, K. Taugbøl\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/208852-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n To reduce the risk of screen plugging with drilling fluid solids, wellbore fluids are typically displaced to low or no solids systems before sand screen lower completions are run in to wells. Displacing the entire wellbore volume to low solids fluids can add significant cost particularly in high pressure wells. An option can be to displace the open hole section of the well only with the low solids fluid and run the lower completion through the original drilling fluid. A refinement of this process is to fill the upper hole section with the low solids fluid in order to pre-saturate the screens assembly. The movement or exchange of the two fluids as the screens are run in to the wellbore has been a significant uncertainty, until now!\\n This work was conducted to investigate the potential for fluids to exchange as sand screen completions are run in to wells in the Field 1 Satellite and Field 2 developments. The hypothesis that fluids in the wellbore would displace fluids inside the screen assembly as the screens are run in to the well was tested. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling was used to simulate the movement of the lower completion in to the well and determine the rate and quantity of fluid exchange.\\n The simulations demonstrated that when stand alone screen (SAS) completions are run in to wellbores, fluids will exchange from outside to inside the screens. This process happens at all tripping speeds examined and in all parts of the cased and open hole wellbore. The fluid exchange continues throughout the running in process, including in the open hole lower completion. There is no value in filling the top hole section with low solids completion fluid unless fluid exchange during running in can be controlled. When a one-way inflow control device (ICD) check valve is fitted to each screen joint allowing fluid to flow in to the tubing but not back out to the annulus then fluid exchange is significantly limited.\\n Careful consideration should be given to the exchange of fluids as lower completion assemblies are run in to wells. If it is considered undesirable that the fluid in the well should enter the lower completion string as it is run in to the well then appropriate valves or flow reduction should be considered. Eliminating the requirement to fill the top hole section with low solids fluid can lead to significant cost reduction in well where expensive fluids, such as Cs formate, are required to meet the low or no solids specifications. Understanding fluid exchange in wells as screens are run in can significantly reduce the risk of formation/completion damage. The work illustrates the value in a novel application of CFD to determine the optimum well construction process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Thu, February 24, 2022\",\"volume\":\"137 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Thu, February 24, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/208852-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, February 24, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208852-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了降低钻井液固体堵塞筛管的风险,通常在下入防砂筛管下部完井之前,将井筒流体置换到低固体或无固体体系中。将整个井筒体积替换为低固相流体会显著增加成本,特别是在高压井中。一种选择是仅用低固相钻井液取代裸眼井段,并通过原始钻井液下入下部完井。该工艺的一个改进是用低固相流体填充上部井段,以使筛管组合预饱和。直到现在,当筛管下入井筒时,两种流体的运动或交换一直是一个很大的不确定性。这项工作的目的是研究在1号油田和2号油田的卫星开发项目中,防砂筛管完井时流体交换的可能性。当筛管下入井中时,井筒中的流体会取代筛管组合内的流体,这一假设得到了验证。计算流体动力学(CFD)模型用于模拟下部完井装置在井中的运动,并确定流体交换的速率和数量。模拟结果表明,当独立筛管(SAS)完井时,流体会从筛管外部交换到筛管内部。该过程在测试的所有起下钻速度下以及套管井眼和裸眼井眼的所有部位都发生。流体交换在整个下入过程中持续进行,包括裸眼下完井。除非能够控制下入过程中的流体交换,否则用低固含量完井液填充顶孔段是没有价值的。当在每个筛管接头上安装单向流入控制装置(ICD)止回阀,使流体流入油管,而不回流到环空时,流体交换就会受到极大限制。在下入下部完井组件时,应仔细考虑流体交换问题。如果认为井中的流体在下入井时不希望进入下部完井管柱,则应考虑使用适当的阀门或降低流量。对于那些需要使用昂贵的流体(如甲酸c)来满足低固相或无固相要求的井来说,消除用低固相流体填充顶孔段的要求可以显著降低成本。了解筛管下入过程中的流体交换情况,可以显著降低地层/完井损坏的风险。该工作说明了CFD在确定最佳建井工艺中的新应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding Fluid Exchange as Screens are Run in Hole – Mitigation of Formation and Completion Damage Risks
To reduce the risk of screen plugging with drilling fluid solids, wellbore fluids are typically displaced to low or no solids systems before sand screen lower completions are run in to wells. Displacing the entire wellbore volume to low solids fluids can add significant cost particularly in high pressure wells. An option can be to displace the open hole section of the well only with the low solids fluid and run the lower completion through the original drilling fluid. A refinement of this process is to fill the upper hole section with the low solids fluid in order to pre-saturate the screens assembly. The movement or exchange of the two fluids as the screens are run in to the wellbore has been a significant uncertainty, until now! This work was conducted to investigate the potential for fluids to exchange as sand screen completions are run in to wells in the Field 1 Satellite and Field 2 developments. The hypothesis that fluids in the wellbore would displace fluids inside the screen assembly as the screens are run in to the well was tested. Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modelling was used to simulate the movement of the lower completion in to the well and determine the rate and quantity of fluid exchange. The simulations demonstrated that when stand alone screen (SAS) completions are run in to wellbores, fluids will exchange from outside to inside the screens. This process happens at all tripping speeds examined and in all parts of the cased and open hole wellbore. The fluid exchange continues throughout the running in process, including in the open hole lower completion. There is no value in filling the top hole section with low solids completion fluid unless fluid exchange during running in can be controlled. When a one-way inflow control device (ICD) check valve is fitted to each screen joint allowing fluid to flow in to the tubing but not back out to the annulus then fluid exchange is significantly limited. Careful consideration should be given to the exchange of fluids as lower completion assemblies are run in to wells. If it is considered undesirable that the fluid in the well should enter the lower completion string as it is run in to the well then appropriate valves or flow reduction should be considered. Eliminating the requirement to fill the top hole section with low solids fluid can lead to significant cost reduction in well where expensive fluids, such as Cs formate, are required to meet the low or no solids specifications. Understanding fluid exchange in wells as screens are run in can significantly reduce the risk of formation/completion damage. The work illustrates the value in a novel application of CFD to determine the optimum well construction process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antigone Power: una straniera alle frontiere dell’Europa « La trace que laissent en nous les choses qu’on a perdues » Entretien avec la bédéiste Zeina Abirached Yves Chemla, Alba Pessini. « Jean-Claude Charles, 1949-2008. La ‘voix fêlée, comme une hirondelle grippée’ » La banalizzazione dello sguardo: Tempo di uccidere dal romanzo al film Humeurs dans les bois Prélude photo-poétique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1