C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt
{"title":"两种测定主流香烟烟气pH值方法的比较","authors":"C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt","doi":"10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two methods used to determine the pH of mainstream cigarette smoke (MSCS) were compared to find the fastest and least complicated method. Both methods involved measuring the pH of only the water-soluble portion of the particulate fraction of MSCS. In method one, the pH of an aqueous extract of glass-fiber filter pads containing total particulate matter (TPM) was measured. In the second method, pH was measured directly from a glass fiber pad containing TPM that was moistened with 3 ml of degassed deionized water. Both methods were able to distinguish pH differences in the differently constructed reference cigarettes evaluated and were reproducible with relative standard deviations of less than 3%. Determination of smoke pH directly from a moistened glass fiber pad containing trapped TPM was found to be less complicated and quicker than determining pH of an aqueous extract due to the elimination of the extraction step.","PeriodicalId":10257,"journal":{"name":"中国烟草科学","volume":"51 1","pages":"5-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE pH OF MAINSTREAM CIGARETTE SMOKE\",\"authors\":\"C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt\",\"doi\":\"10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Two methods used to determine the pH of mainstream cigarette smoke (MSCS) were compared to find the fastest and least complicated method. Both methods involved measuring the pH of only the water-soluble portion of the particulate fraction of MSCS. In method one, the pH of an aqueous extract of glass-fiber filter pads containing total particulate matter (TPM) was measured. In the second method, pH was measured directly from a glass fiber pad containing TPM that was moistened with 3 ml of degassed deionized water. Both methods were able to distinguish pH differences in the differently constructed reference cigarettes evaluated and were reproducible with relative standard deviations of less than 3%. Determination of smoke pH directly from a moistened glass fiber pad containing trapped TPM was found to be less complicated and quicker than determining pH of an aqueous extract due to the elimination of the extraction step.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国烟草科学\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"5-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国烟草科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1091\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国烟草科学","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS FOR DETERMINING THE pH OF MAINSTREAM CIGARETTE SMOKE
Abstract Two methods used to determine the pH of mainstream cigarette smoke (MSCS) were compared to find the fastest and least complicated method. Both methods involved measuring the pH of only the water-soluble portion of the particulate fraction of MSCS. In method one, the pH of an aqueous extract of glass-fiber filter pads containing total particulate matter (TPM) was measured. In the second method, pH was measured directly from a glass fiber pad containing TPM that was moistened with 3 ml of degassed deionized water. Both methods were able to distinguish pH differences in the differently constructed reference cigarettes evaluated and were reproducible with relative standard deviations of less than 3%. Determination of smoke pH directly from a moistened glass fiber pad containing trapped TPM was found to be less complicated and quicker than determining pH of an aqueous extract due to the elimination of the extraction step.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Tobacco Science is an academic scientific journal (bimonthly) under the supervision of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People's Republic of China, and sponsored by the Tobacco Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and the Qingzhou Tobacco Research Institute of China National Tobacco Corporation. It was founded in 1979 and is publicly distributed nationwide. The journal mainly publishes academic papers on scientific research results, new production technologies, and modern management in my country's tobacco science research and tobacco production technology. In addition, it also publishes forward-looking review articles in the field of tobacco research. There are columns such as tobacco genetics and breeding, cultivation technology, modulation and processing, physiology and biochemistry, plant protection, review or monograph, quality chemistry, etc.