伦敦的一家外国酒店:希尔顿在“摇摆的六十年代”的合法性谈判史

Barbara Czyżewska, A. Roper
{"title":"伦敦的一家外国酒店:希尔顿在“摇摆的六十年代”的合法性谈判史","authors":"Barbara Czyżewska, A. Roper","doi":"10.1386/HOSP.7.3.219_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whilst theories of business internationalisation assert that foreignness poses challenges to multinational companies’ subsidiaries operating abroad, historical study of Hilton International’s expansion in the 1960s suggests otherwise. \n \nIn its early internationalisation Hilton International transferred abroad its institutional ownership advantages including corporate philosophy and culture; its practices, policies, processes and work systems and product design. Despite claims of social embeddedness, the London Hilton was perceived to be a typically American hotel. Analysis of Hilton’s expansion strategy suggests that the company used its foreignness as a differentiating factor. \n \nThis paper contributes to the limited business history research in the area of internationalisation and knowledge transference. Historical analysis of Hilton’s internationalisation contradicts the institutionalism’s assumption that multinationals must adapt to local institutional settings. This paper enhances the notion that playing the ‘foreignness’ game can lead to comparative global advantage.","PeriodicalId":13033,"journal":{"name":"Hospital medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A foreign hotel in London: the history of Hilton's negotiation of legitimacy in the 'swinging sixties'\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Czyżewska, A. Roper\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/HOSP.7.3.219_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Whilst theories of business internationalisation assert that foreignness poses challenges to multinational companies’ subsidiaries operating abroad, historical study of Hilton International’s expansion in the 1960s suggests otherwise. \\n \\nIn its early internationalisation Hilton International transferred abroad its institutional ownership advantages including corporate philosophy and culture; its practices, policies, processes and work systems and product design. Despite claims of social embeddedness, the London Hilton was perceived to be a typically American hotel. Analysis of Hilton’s expansion strategy suggests that the company used its foreignness as a differentiating factor. \\n \\nThis paper contributes to the limited business history research in the area of internationalisation and knowledge transference. Historical analysis of Hilton’s internationalisation contradicts the institutionalism’s assumption that multinationals must adapt to local institutional settings. This paper enhances the notion that playing the ‘foreignness’ game can lead to comparative global advantage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/HOSP.7.3.219_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/HOSP.7.3.219_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

虽然商业国际化理论断言,外国对跨国公司在海外经营的子公司构成了挑战,但对希尔顿国际集团(Hilton International)上世纪60年代扩张的历史研究表明,情况并非如此。在国际化初期,希尔顿国际集团将其企业理念和文化等制度所有权优势转移到国外;它的实践、政策、过程、工作系统和产品设计。尽管声称具有社会嵌入性,但伦敦希尔顿被认为是一家典型的美国酒店。对希尔顿扩张战略的分析表明,该公司将其异域性作为差异化因素。本文对国际化和知识转移领域有限的商业史研究有所贡献。对希尔顿国际化的历史分析与制度主义关于跨国公司必须适应当地制度环境的假设相矛盾。本文强化了这样一种观念,即玩“异域”游戏可以带来相对的全球优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A foreign hotel in London: the history of Hilton's negotiation of legitimacy in the 'swinging sixties'
Whilst theories of business internationalisation assert that foreignness poses challenges to multinational companies’ subsidiaries operating abroad, historical study of Hilton International’s expansion in the 1960s suggests otherwise. In its early internationalisation Hilton International transferred abroad its institutional ownership advantages including corporate philosophy and culture; its practices, policies, processes and work systems and product design. Despite claims of social embeddedness, the London Hilton was perceived to be a typically American hotel. Analysis of Hilton’s expansion strategy suggests that the company used its foreignness as a differentiating factor. This paper contributes to the limited business history research in the area of internationalisation and knowledge transference. Historical analysis of Hilton’s internationalisation contradicts the institutionalism’s assumption that multinationals must adapt to local institutional settings. This paper enhances the notion that playing the ‘foreignness’ game can lead to comparative global advantage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mundane ideologies of (in)hospitality: A guided coach tour Corporate social responsibility in luxury hotels in Cusco (Peru) to benefit indigenous communities Special Issue editorial: Hospitality insights through the lens of organizational communication Implications of spirituality and Islamic Shari’a law for workers’ well-being in luxury hotels: A eudaimonic view Stakeholder theory in the hospitality field: Insights drawn from a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1