杂交土鸡胴体产量及肉品质的研究

Doungnapa Promket, Khanitta Ruangwittayanusorn, Thasawan Somchan
{"title":"杂交土鸡胴体产量及肉品质的研究","authors":"Doungnapa Promket,&nbsp;Khanitta Ruangwittayanusorn,&nbsp;Thasawan Somchan","doi":"10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective of this study was to examine the production efficiency of crossbred native chicken (Chee) in terms of carcass yields and meat quality. One-day old 180 chickens from 3 breed groups of crossbred 1.LBC: (Broilers+ Layers) ×Chee, 2. LSC: (Shanghai+ Layer)× Chee, and 3. LSRBC: (Shanghai Road Bar + Layers)× Chee were raised to 12 weeks. The completely randomized design (CRD) was used to analyse carcass yields and meat quality. The result showed that wing percentage and total visceral from LSC and LSRBC were higher than LBC (P&lt;0.05). Moreover, LSC (13.917) had higher drumstick percentage than LBC and LSRBC (10.418 and 11.155, respectively). Percentage of loin was higher for LBC and LSRBC than LSC (P&lt;0.05). Slaughter weight, percentage of dressing, thigh, tender loin and visceral fat werenot different among 3 groups. Meat quality, the pH value measured in the breast and thigh meats at 0<!--> <!-->h was not significantly different. The pH at 24<!--> <!-->h of thigh meat and the LSRBC had the lower pH (5.186) than LBC (6.043) and LSC (6.046). The color of meat, LSRBC thigh meat was less yellow (low b*) than LBC and LSC (6.367, 12.517 and 12.080, respectively). The breast meat color at 0 and 24<!--> <!-->h and skin color for three groups were not significant. The indicators of drip loss and boiling loss on breast and thigh meat were not significantly different among the groups. The grill loss of breast and thigh meat from LBC sample had less grill loss than other samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100063,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia","volume":"11 ","pages":"Pages 84-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.12.014","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Study of Carcass Yields and Meat Quality in Crossbred Native Chicken (Chee)\",\"authors\":\"Doungnapa Promket,&nbsp;Khanitta Ruangwittayanusorn,&nbsp;Thasawan Somchan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.12.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective of this study was to examine the production efficiency of crossbred native chicken (Chee) in terms of carcass yields and meat quality. One-day old 180 chickens from 3 breed groups of crossbred 1.LBC: (Broilers+ Layers) ×Chee, 2. LSC: (Shanghai+ Layer)× Chee, and 3. LSRBC: (Shanghai Road Bar + Layers)× Chee were raised to 12 weeks. The completely randomized design (CRD) was used to analyse carcass yields and meat quality. The result showed that wing percentage and total visceral from LSC and LSRBC were higher than LBC (P&lt;0.05). Moreover, LSC (13.917) had higher drumstick percentage than LBC and LSRBC (10.418 and 11.155, respectively). Percentage of loin was higher for LBC and LSRBC than LSC (P&lt;0.05). Slaughter weight, percentage of dressing, thigh, tender loin and visceral fat werenot different among 3 groups. Meat quality, the pH value measured in the breast and thigh meats at 0<!--> <!-->h was not significantly different. The pH at 24<!--> <!-->h of thigh meat and the LSRBC had the lower pH (5.186) than LBC (6.043) and LSC (6.046). The color of meat, LSRBC thigh meat was less yellow (low b*) than LBC and LSC (6.367, 12.517 and 12.080, respectively). The breast meat color at 0 and 24<!--> <!-->h and skin color for three groups were not significant. The indicators of drip loss and boiling loss on breast and thigh meat were not significantly different among the groups. The grill loss of breast and thigh meat from LBC sample had less grill loss than other samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 84-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.12.014\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210784316302984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210784316302984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究的目的是研究杂交土鸡(Chee)在胴体产量和肉品质方面的生产效率。杂交1个品种组,日龄180只。LBC:(肉鸡+蛋鸡)×Chee, 2。LSC:(上海+层)× Chee, 3。LSRBC:(上海路酒吧+蛋鸡)× Chee饲养至12周。采用完全随机设计(CRD)分析胴体产量和肉质。结果表明,LSC和LSRBC的翅百分率和总内脏量均高于LBC (P<0.05)。LSC(13.917)的鸡腿率高于LBC(10.418)和LSRBC(11.155)。LBC和LSRBC的腰部比例高于LSC (P<0.05)。3组间屠宰重、屠宰率、大腿率、嫩腰率和内脏脂肪率无显著差异。肉质方面,0 h时胸肉和大腿肉的pH值无显著差异。鸡腿肉24 h pH值为5.186,低于LBC(6.043)和LSC(6.046)。肉的颜色,LSRBC的大腿肉比LBC和LSC少黄(低b*)(分别为6.367、12.517和12.080)。3组仔猪0、24 h时的胸肉颜色和皮肤颜色均不显著。胸肉和大腿肉的滴漏损失和沸腾损失指标各组间无显著差异。LBC样品的胸肉和大腿肉的烧烤损失比其他样品的烧烤损失小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Study of Carcass Yields and Meat Quality in Crossbred Native Chicken (Chee)

The objective of this study was to examine the production efficiency of crossbred native chicken (Chee) in terms of carcass yields and meat quality. One-day old 180 chickens from 3 breed groups of crossbred 1.LBC: (Broilers+ Layers) ×Chee, 2. LSC: (Shanghai+ Layer)× Chee, and 3. LSRBC: (Shanghai Road Bar + Layers)× Chee were raised to 12 weeks. The completely randomized design (CRD) was used to analyse carcass yields and meat quality. The result showed that wing percentage and total visceral from LSC and LSRBC were higher than LBC (P<0.05). Moreover, LSC (13.917) had higher drumstick percentage than LBC and LSRBC (10.418 and 11.155, respectively). Percentage of loin was higher for LBC and LSRBC than LSC (P<0.05). Slaughter weight, percentage of dressing, thigh, tender loin and visceral fat werenot different among 3 groups. Meat quality, the pH value measured in the breast and thigh meats at 0 h was not significantly different. The pH at 24 h of thigh meat and the LSRBC had the lower pH (5.186) than LBC (6.043) and LSC (6.046). The color of meat, LSRBC thigh meat was less yellow (low b*) than LBC and LSC (6.367, 12.517 and 12.080, respectively). The breast meat color at 0 and 24 h and skin color for three groups were not significant. The indicators of drip loss and boiling loss on breast and thigh meat were not significantly different among the groups. The grill loss of breast and thigh meat from LBC sample had less grill loss than other samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How the Nexus of Water/Food/Energy can be Seen with the Perspective of People well being and the Italian BES Framework Non Solo Cibo, Not Just Food: Which Compatibility between Consumers’ Ethical and Social Preoccupations and Trade and Commercial Law? Developing a Rating Model for Selection Solar Wood Drying Location A Preliminary Study on a New Approach to Estimate Water Resource Allocation: The Net Water Footprint Applied to Animal Products Grain Yield and Yield Components at Triticale under Different Technological Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1