阿司匹林和冠状动脉手术:系统回顾和荟萃分析

S. Hastings, P. Myles, D. McIlroy
{"title":"阿司匹林和冠状动脉手术:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"S. Hastings, P. Myles, D. McIlroy","doi":"10.1097/01.sa.0000482337.21445.bd","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"R esearchers evaluated the differential effects of both colloid and crystalloid fluid retention on renal oxygen delivery, glomerular filtration, renal oxygen consumption, and the renal oxygen supply-demand relationship after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Subjects included 30 patients with normal preoperative renal function who underwent uncomplicated cardiac surgery. The patients were studied in the early postoperative period while admitted to the intensive care unit. Patients were randomized to receive a bolus of either crystalloid or colloid fluids. Despite an increase in cardiac index and renal blood flow identified with the administration of each, neither type of fluid improved renal oxygen delivery, owing to hemodilution. Crystalloid fluids increased glomerular filtration, but colloid fluids did not. Furthermore, an increase in filtration fraction and renal oxygen extraction in the crystalloid group indicates that the increase in glomerular filtration was not matched by a proportional increase in renal oxygen delivery.","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspirin and Coronary Artery Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Hastings, P. Myles, D. McIlroy\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.sa.0000482337.21445.bd\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"R esearchers evaluated the differential effects of both colloid and crystalloid fluid retention on renal oxygen delivery, glomerular filtration, renal oxygen consumption, and the renal oxygen supply-demand relationship after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Subjects included 30 patients with normal preoperative renal function who underwent uncomplicated cardiac surgery. The patients were studied in the early postoperative period while admitted to the intensive care unit. Patients were randomized to receive a bolus of either crystalloid or colloid fluids. Despite an increase in cardiac index and renal blood flow identified with the administration of each, neither type of fluid improved renal oxygen delivery, owing to hemodilution. Crystalloid fluids increased glomerular filtration, but colloid fluids did not. Furthermore, an increase in filtration fraction and renal oxygen extraction in the crystalloid group indicates that the increase in glomerular filtration was not matched by a proportional increase in renal oxygen delivery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Survey of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000482337.21445.bd\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000482337.21445.bd","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

研究人员评估了胶体和晶体液体潴留对体外循环手术后肾氧输送、肾小球滤过、肾耗氧量和肾氧供需关系的不同影响。研究对象包括30例术前肾功能正常且行无并发症心脏手术的患者。患者在术后早期入住重症监护病房时进行研究。患者随机接受晶体或胶体液体。尽管心脏指数和肾血流量随着每一种液体的施用而增加,但由于血液稀释,这两种液体都没有改善肾供氧。晶体液体增加肾小球滤过,但胶体液体没有。此外,晶体组滤过分数和肾氧提取的增加表明肾小球滤过的增加并不与肾氧输送的比例增加相匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aspirin and Coronary Artery Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
R esearchers evaluated the differential effects of both colloid and crystalloid fluid retention on renal oxygen delivery, glomerular filtration, renal oxygen consumption, and the renal oxygen supply-demand relationship after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Subjects included 30 patients with normal preoperative renal function who underwent uncomplicated cardiac surgery. The patients were studied in the early postoperative period while admitted to the intensive care unit. Patients were randomized to receive a bolus of either crystalloid or colloid fluids. Despite an increase in cardiac index and renal blood flow identified with the administration of each, neither type of fluid improved renal oxygen delivery, owing to hemodilution. Crystalloid fluids increased glomerular filtration, but colloid fluids did not. Furthermore, an increase in filtration fraction and renal oxygen extraction in the crystalloid group indicates that the increase in glomerular filtration was not matched by a proportional increase in renal oxygen delivery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Context is king - obstetric anaesthesia management strategies in limited resource settings. Preoperative Administration of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers: Do We Have Enough “VISION” to Stop It? Implementing a Statistical Model for Protamine Titration: Effects on Coagulation in Cardiac Surgical Patients Vasopressin, Norepinephrine, and Vasodilatory Shock After Cardiac Surgery: Another “VASST” Difference? Prospective Double Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of the Pectoral Nerves (Pecs) Block Type II
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1