一种认知策略逻辑(扩展摘要)

Hkhmt m`Sr Pub Date : 2014-04-03 DOI:10.4204/EPTCS.146.5
Xiaowei Huang, R. V. D. Meyden
{"title":"一种认知策略逻辑(扩展摘要)","authors":"Xiaowei Huang, R. V. D. Meyden","doi":"10.4204/EPTCS.146.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents an extension of temporal epistemic logic with operators that quantify over strategies. The language also provides a natural way to represent what agents would know were they to be aware of the strategies being used by other agents. Some examples are presented to motivate the framework, and relationships to several variants of alternating temporal epistemic logic are discussed. The computational complexity of model checking the logic is also characterized.","PeriodicalId":53035,"journal":{"name":"Hkhmt m`Sr","volume":"16 3 1","pages":"35-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Epistemic Strategy Logic (Extended Abstract)\",\"authors\":\"Xiaowei Huang, R. V. D. Meyden\",\"doi\":\"10.4204/EPTCS.146.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper presents an extension of temporal epistemic logic with operators that quantify over strategies. The language also provides a natural way to represent what agents would know were they to be aware of the strategies being used by other agents. Some examples are presented to motivate the framework, and relationships to several variants of alternating temporal epistemic logic are discussed. The computational complexity of model checking the logic is also characterized.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hkhmt m`Sr\",\"volume\":\"16 3 1\",\"pages\":\"35-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hkhmt m`Sr\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.146.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hkhmt m`Sr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.146.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文提出了时间认知逻辑的一种扩展,其中包含了对策略进行量化的算子。该语言还提供了一种自然的方式来表示如果智能体知道其他智能体正在使用的策略,它们将知道什么。给出了一些例子来激励框架,并讨论了与交替时间认知逻辑的几种变体的关系。分析了模型检验逻辑的计算复杂度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Epistemic Strategy Logic (Extended Abstract)
The paper presents an extension of temporal epistemic logic with operators that quantify over strategies. The language also provides a natural way to represent what agents would know were they to be aware of the strategies being used by other agents. Some examples are presented to motivate the framework, and relationships to several variants of alternating temporal epistemic logic are discussed. The computational complexity of model checking the logic is also characterized.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Representing Strategies Extended Graded Modalities in Strategy Logic Rational verification in Iterated Electric Boolean Games Extending Finite Memory Determinacy to Multiplayer Games Expectations or Guarantees? I Want It All! A crossroad between games and MDPs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1