语言障碍和空间畸变对韦氏-贝尔维尤结果的影响。

H. Kløve, R. Reitan
{"title":"语言障碍和空间畸变对韦氏-贝尔维尤结果的影响。","authors":"H. Kløve, R. Reitan","doi":"10.1001/ARCHNEURPSYC.1958.02340120044006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Psychological testing of patients with complaints resulting in admission to neurology and neurological surgery services frequently reveals striking deficiencies in fundamental abilities. In a group of 221 patients with verified brain damage, 64 (29%) showed an inability to copy a Greek cross without clear error or distortion. Forty-seven (21%) of the group showed definite evidence of dysphasia. Twenty-one of these patients showed both of these deficits. Since disabilities of these types are usually easily detected and demonstrated without detailed or time-consuming testing, it seemed of value to inquire regarding the possibility of their more general significance with respect to psychological test results. Material and Methods In composing the groups for comparative study the first step was to select all patients who gave evidence of dysphasia or who had any difficulty in copying a Greek cross. The Halstead-Wepman Aphasia Screening Test had been administered to each patient routinely and was used","PeriodicalId":6866,"journal":{"name":"A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry","volume":"31 1","pages":"708-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1958-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of dysphasia and spatial distortion on Wechsler-Bellevue results.\",\"authors\":\"H. Kløve, R. Reitan\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/ARCHNEURPSYC.1958.02340120044006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Psychological testing of patients with complaints resulting in admission to neurology and neurological surgery services frequently reveals striking deficiencies in fundamental abilities. In a group of 221 patients with verified brain damage, 64 (29%) showed an inability to copy a Greek cross without clear error or distortion. Forty-seven (21%) of the group showed definite evidence of dysphasia. Twenty-one of these patients showed both of these deficits. Since disabilities of these types are usually easily detected and demonstrated without detailed or time-consuming testing, it seemed of value to inquire regarding the possibility of their more general significance with respect to psychological test results. Material and Methods In composing the groups for comparative study the first step was to select all patients who gave evidence of dysphasia or who had any difficulty in copying a Greek cross. The Halstead-Wepman Aphasia Screening Test had been administered to each patient routinely and was used\",\"PeriodicalId\":6866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"708-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1958-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHNEURPSYC.1958.02340120044006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/ARCHNEURPSYC.1958.02340120044006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

对因主诉而到神经内科和神经外科就诊的病人进行的心理测试经常显示出他们在基本能力方面的显著缺陷。在一组221名确诊脑损伤的患者中,64名(29%)表现出没有明显错误或扭曲的情况下无法复制希腊十字架。其中47例(21%)表现出明显的言语障碍。其中21名患者同时表现出这两种缺陷。由于这些类型的残疾通常很容易发现和证明,而不需要详细或耗时的测试,因此似乎有必要研究一下它们在心理测试结果方面是否具有更普遍的意义。材料和方法在组成比较研究的组时,第一步是选择所有表现出语言障碍或在抄写希腊十字架时有困难的患者。Halstead-Wepman失语症筛查试验对每位患者进行了常规检查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of dysphasia and spatial distortion on Wechsler-Bellevue results.
Psychological testing of patients with complaints resulting in admission to neurology and neurological surgery services frequently reveals striking deficiencies in fundamental abilities. In a group of 221 patients with verified brain damage, 64 (29%) showed an inability to copy a Greek cross without clear error or distortion. Forty-seven (21%) of the group showed definite evidence of dysphasia. Twenty-one of these patients showed both of these deficits. Since disabilities of these types are usually easily detected and demonstrated without detailed or time-consuming testing, it seemed of value to inquire regarding the possibility of their more general significance with respect to psychological test results. Material and Methods In composing the groups for comparative study the first step was to select all patients who gave evidence of dysphasia or who had any difficulty in copying a Greek cross. The Halstead-Wepman Aphasia Screening Test had been administered to each patient routinely and was used
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease. Word deafness and Wernicke's aphasia; report of cases and discussion of the syndrome. Cerebral embolism; the natural history, prognostic signs and effects of anticoagulation. Muscle dystrophy in mice of the Bar Harbor strain; an electromyographic comparison with dystrophia myotonica in man. Intracranial aneurysms; methods of treatment; value of hypothermia in the surgical approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1