{"title":"城市、德国和亚琛的Letaldus:中世纪建筑的历史、背景和相似性问题","authors":"Jenny H. Shaffer","doi":"10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.3017478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Architectural historians, focused on whether form or meaning had primacy in the medieval “copy,” have debated the significance and value of Letaldus of Micy’s statement that Theodulf’s oratory at Germigny-des-Pres was “manifestly in the likeness” of Aachen, as Germigny-des-Pres bore little formal resemblance to Charlemagne’s famous chapel. Letaldus’s quote, however, has been divorced from its textual and historical contexts. Considered as part of his tenth-century Miracula Sancti Maximini and the circumstances of its production, Letaldus’s association of the ninth-century buildings confirms Richard Krautheimer’s well-known assertion that meaning was primary in medieval notions of likeness, voicing an image of a Carolingian past remembered in light of fierce present struggles within the monastic world of the Orleanais. Indeed, rather than answering the question of whether Germigny-des-Pres was built as a “copy” of Aachen, Letaldus’s quote raises the issue of how buildings’ complex, layered, and transformin...","PeriodicalId":39588,"journal":{"name":"Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies","volume":"32 1","pages":"53-83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letaldus of Micy, Germigny-des-Prés, and Aachen: Histories, Contexts, and the Problem of Likeness in Medieval Architecture\",\"authors\":\"Jenny H. Shaffer\",\"doi\":\"10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.3017478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Architectural historians, focused on whether form or meaning had primacy in the medieval “copy,” have debated the significance and value of Letaldus of Micy’s statement that Theodulf’s oratory at Germigny-des-Pres was “manifestly in the likeness” of Aachen, as Germigny-des-Pres bore little formal resemblance to Charlemagne’s famous chapel. Letaldus’s quote, however, has been divorced from its textual and historical contexts. Considered as part of his tenth-century Miracula Sancti Maximini and the circumstances of its production, Letaldus’s association of the ninth-century buildings confirms Richard Krautheimer’s well-known assertion that meaning was primary in medieval notions of likeness, voicing an image of a Carolingian past remembered in light of fierce present struggles within the monastic world of the Orleanais. Indeed, rather than answering the question of whether Germigny-des-Pres was built as a “copy” of Aachen, Letaldus’s quote raises the issue of how buildings’ complex, layered, and transformin...\",\"PeriodicalId\":39588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"53-83\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.3017478\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Viator - Medieval and Renaissance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1484/J.VIATOR.2.3017478","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
建筑历史学家关注的是形式还是意义在中世纪的“复制”中占据主导地位,他们对Letaldus of Micy的说法的意义和价值进行了争论,Letaldus of Micy说,狄奥多夫在德国教堂的演讲“明显与亚琛相似”,因为德国教堂与查理曼著名的教堂几乎没有形式上的相似之处。然而,莱塔尔杜斯的这句话已经脱离了它的文本和历史背景。Letaldus的作品《Miracula Sancti Maximini》被认为是他十世纪作品《Miracula Sancti Maximini》及其创作环境的一部分,他对九世纪建筑的联想证实了Richard Krautheimer的著名论断,即中世纪的相似性概念的意义是主要的,表达了一种加洛林王朝时期的过去,在奥尔利纳修道院世界激烈斗争的背景下被人们记住。事实上,Letaldus的这句话并没有回答“德国是否复制了亚琛”的问题,而是提出了一个问题,即建筑的复杂、分层和变化……
Letaldus of Micy, Germigny-des-Prés, and Aachen: Histories, Contexts, and the Problem of Likeness in Medieval Architecture
Architectural historians, focused on whether form or meaning had primacy in the medieval “copy,” have debated the significance and value of Letaldus of Micy’s statement that Theodulf’s oratory at Germigny-des-Pres was “manifestly in the likeness” of Aachen, as Germigny-des-Pres bore little formal resemblance to Charlemagne’s famous chapel. Letaldus’s quote, however, has been divorced from its textual and historical contexts. Considered as part of his tenth-century Miracula Sancti Maximini and the circumstances of its production, Letaldus’s association of the ninth-century buildings confirms Richard Krautheimer’s well-known assertion that meaning was primary in medieval notions of likeness, voicing an image of a Carolingian past remembered in light of fierce present struggles within the monastic world of the Orleanais. Indeed, rather than answering the question of whether Germigny-des-Pres was built as a “copy” of Aachen, Letaldus’s quote raises the issue of how buildings’ complex, layered, and transformin...