信念-欲望-意图(BDI)架构中的行为灵活性

IF 0.6 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Multiagent and Grid Systems Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.3233/mgs-200335
Adel Saadi, R. Maamri, Z. Sahnoun
{"title":"信念-欲望-意图(BDI)架构中的行为灵活性","authors":"Adel Saadi, R. Maamri, Z. Sahnoun","doi":"10.3233/mgs-200335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model is a popular approach to design flexible agents. The key ingredient of BDI model, that contributed to concretize behavioral flexibility, is the inclusion of the practical reasoning. On the other hand, researchers signaled some missing flexibility’s ingredient, in BDI model, essentially the lack of learning. Therefore, an extensive research was conducted in order to extend BDI agents with learning. Although this latter body of research is important, the key contribution of BDI model, i.e., practical reasoning, did not receive a sufficient attention. For instance, for performance reasons, some of the concepts included in the BDI model are neglected by BDI architectures. Neglecting these concepts was criticized by some researchers, as the ability of the agent to reason will be limited, which eventually leads to a more or less flexible reasoning, depending on the concepts explicitly included. The current paper aims to stimulate the researchers to re-explore the concretization of practical reasoning in BDI architectures. Concretely, this paper aims to stimulate a critical review of BDI architectures regarding the flexibility, inherent from the practical reasoning, in the context of single agents, situated in an environment which is not associated with uncertainty. Based on this review, we sketch a new orientation and some suggested improvements for the design of BDI agents. Finally, a simple experiment on a specific case study is carried out to evaluate some suggested improvements, namely the contribution of the agent’s “well-informedness” in the enhancement of the behavioral flexibility.","PeriodicalId":43659,"journal":{"name":"Multiagent and Grid Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behavioral flexibility in Belief-Desire- Intention (BDI) architectures\",\"authors\":\"Adel Saadi, R. Maamri, Z. Sahnoun\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/mgs-200335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model is a popular approach to design flexible agents. The key ingredient of BDI model, that contributed to concretize behavioral flexibility, is the inclusion of the practical reasoning. On the other hand, researchers signaled some missing flexibility’s ingredient, in BDI model, essentially the lack of learning. Therefore, an extensive research was conducted in order to extend BDI agents with learning. Although this latter body of research is important, the key contribution of BDI model, i.e., practical reasoning, did not receive a sufficient attention. For instance, for performance reasons, some of the concepts included in the BDI model are neglected by BDI architectures. Neglecting these concepts was criticized by some researchers, as the ability of the agent to reason will be limited, which eventually leads to a more or less flexible reasoning, depending on the concepts explicitly included. The current paper aims to stimulate the researchers to re-explore the concretization of practical reasoning in BDI architectures. Concretely, this paper aims to stimulate a critical review of BDI architectures regarding the flexibility, inherent from the practical reasoning, in the context of single agents, situated in an environment which is not associated with uncertainty. Based on this review, we sketch a new orientation and some suggested improvements for the design of BDI agents. Finally, a simple experiment on a specific case study is carried out to evaluate some suggested improvements, namely the contribution of the agent’s “well-informedness” in the enhancement of the behavioral flexibility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiagent and Grid Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiagent and Grid Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/mgs-200335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiagent and Grid Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/mgs-200335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

信念-欲望-意图(Belief-Desire-Intention, BDI)模型是设计柔性智能体的常用方法。BDI模型的关键因素是包含了实践推理,这有助于将行为灵活性具体化。另一方面,研究人员指出,在BDI模型中,缺少一些灵活性的成分,本质上是缺乏学习。因此,为了扩展BDI代理的学习能力,进行了广泛的研究。虽然后一项研究很重要,但BDI模型的关键贡献,即实践推理,并没有得到足够的重视。例如,出于性能原因,BDI体系结构忽略了BDI模型中包含的一些概念。忽视这些概念受到一些研究人员的批评,因为智能体的推理能力将受到限制,最终导致或多或少的灵活推理,取决于明确包含的概念。本文旨在激发研究者重新探索BDI架构中实践推理的具体化。具体地说,本文旨在激发对BDI架构关于灵活性的批判性审查,这是在单个代理的背景下,从实际推理中固有的,位于与不确定性无关的环境中。在此基础上,提出了BDI制剂设计的新方向和改进建议。最后,通过一个简单的案例研究来评估一些建议的改进,即agent的“良好信息”在增强行为灵活性方面的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Behavioral flexibility in Belief-Desire- Intention (BDI) architectures
The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model is a popular approach to design flexible agents. The key ingredient of BDI model, that contributed to concretize behavioral flexibility, is the inclusion of the practical reasoning. On the other hand, researchers signaled some missing flexibility’s ingredient, in BDI model, essentially the lack of learning. Therefore, an extensive research was conducted in order to extend BDI agents with learning. Although this latter body of research is important, the key contribution of BDI model, i.e., practical reasoning, did not receive a sufficient attention. For instance, for performance reasons, some of the concepts included in the BDI model are neglected by BDI architectures. Neglecting these concepts was criticized by some researchers, as the ability of the agent to reason will be limited, which eventually leads to a more or less flexible reasoning, depending on the concepts explicitly included. The current paper aims to stimulate the researchers to re-explore the concretization of practical reasoning in BDI architectures. Concretely, this paper aims to stimulate a critical review of BDI architectures regarding the flexibility, inherent from the practical reasoning, in the context of single agents, situated in an environment which is not associated with uncertainty. Based on this review, we sketch a new orientation and some suggested improvements for the design of BDI agents. Finally, a simple experiment on a specific case study is carried out to evaluate some suggested improvements, namely the contribution of the agent’s “well-informedness” in the enhancement of the behavioral flexibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Multiagent and Grid Systems
Multiagent and Grid Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Blockchain applications for Internet of Things (IoT): A review Sine tangent search algorithm enabled LeNet for cotton crop classification using satellite image Optimization enabled elastic scaling in cloud based on predicted load for resource management Geese jellyfish search optimization trained deep learning for multiclass plant disease detection using leaf images Adam Adadelta Optimization based bidirectional encoder representations from transformers model for fake news detection on social media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1