Min-Xiong Zhou, Ke Zan, X. Min, Liang Wang, Chao Ma, Xu Yan
{"title":"快速SE-EPI T2定位与常规CPMG T2定位的验证及其在前列腺癌中的应用","authors":"Min-Xiong Zhou, Ke Zan, X. Min, Liang Wang, Chao Ma, Xu Yan","doi":"10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempts to compare a new fast SE-EPI T2 mapping method with the conventional CPMG method, which showed potential in prostate cancer evaluation and also other applications. The SE-EPI method has advantages in faster acquisition than CPMG method and can be integrated into scan of diffusion imaging with slightly increase of acquisition time. Voxel-by-voxel and region-of-interest (ROI) based analysis were performed to compare these two methods. The result showed that the T2 values of SE-EPI method is relatively lower than those of CPMG method, while a strong correlation was found: voxel-by-voxel analysis showed that the correlation coefficient was up to 0.84; in ROI-based analysis, correlation coefficient was up to 0.87. In addition, the clinical validation showed that the T2 maps of SE-EPI at b = 0 and CPMG-based T2 have similar statistical significance in differentiating between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) with mean and standard deviation of 81.6 ± 13.8 vs 72.2 ± 8.5 (SE-EPI) and 108.9 ± 37.8 vs 87.5 ± 10.6 (CPMG). Thus, this work suggests that the SE-EPI method could be considered as a candidate for fast T2 mapping, and be used alone or combined with diffusion in multi-parametric analysis.","PeriodicalId":6474,"journal":{"name":"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","volume":"23 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of fast SE-EPI T2 mapping with reference to conventional CPMG T2 mapping, and its application in prostate cancer\",\"authors\":\"Min-Xiong Zhou, Ke Zan, X. Min, Liang Wang, Chao Ma, Xu Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study attempts to compare a new fast SE-EPI T2 mapping method with the conventional CPMG method, which showed potential in prostate cancer evaluation and also other applications. The SE-EPI method has advantages in faster acquisition than CPMG method and can be integrated into scan of diffusion imaging with slightly increase of acquisition time. Voxel-by-voxel and region-of-interest (ROI) based analysis were performed to compare these two methods. The result showed that the T2 values of SE-EPI method is relatively lower than those of CPMG method, while a strong correlation was found: voxel-by-voxel analysis showed that the correlation coefficient was up to 0.84; in ROI-based analysis, correlation coefficient was up to 0.87. In addition, the clinical validation showed that the T2 maps of SE-EPI at b = 0 and CPMG-based T2 have similar statistical significance in differentiating between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) with mean and standard deviation of 81.6 ± 13.8 vs 72.2 ± 8.5 (SE-EPI) and 108.9 ± 37.8 vs 87.5 ± 10.6 (CPMG). Thus, this work suggests that the SE-EPI method could be considered as a candidate for fast T2 mapping, and be used alone or combined with diffusion in multi-parametric analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 10th International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISP-BMEI.2017.8302183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究试图将一种新的快速SE-EPI T2定位方法与传统的CPMG方法进行比较,该方法在前列腺癌评估和其他方面具有潜在的应用前景。SE-EPI方法比CPMG方法具有更快的采集速度,可以集成到扩散成像扫描中,但采集时间略有增加。采用逐体素和基于感兴趣区域(ROI)的分析对这两种方法进行比较。结果表明,SE-EPI方法的T2值相对低于CPMG方法,但存在较强的相关性:逐体素分析显示相关系数高达0.84;在基于roi的分析中,相关系数高达0.87。此外,临床验证显示,b = 0时SE-EPI T2图谱与CPMG T2图谱对良性前列腺增生(BPH)与前列腺癌(PCa)的鉴别具有相似的统计学意义,其均值和标准差分别为81.6±13.8 vs 72.2±8.5 (SE-EPI)和108.9±37.8 vs 87.5±10.6 (CPMG)。因此,这项工作表明SE-EPI方法可以被认为是快速T2映射的候选方法,可以单独使用或与多参数分析中的扩散相结合。
Validation of fast SE-EPI T2 mapping with reference to conventional CPMG T2 mapping, and its application in prostate cancer
This study attempts to compare a new fast SE-EPI T2 mapping method with the conventional CPMG method, which showed potential in prostate cancer evaluation and also other applications. The SE-EPI method has advantages in faster acquisition than CPMG method and can be integrated into scan of diffusion imaging with slightly increase of acquisition time. Voxel-by-voxel and region-of-interest (ROI) based analysis were performed to compare these two methods. The result showed that the T2 values of SE-EPI method is relatively lower than those of CPMG method, while a strong correlation was found: voxel-by-voxel analysis showed that the correlation coefficient was up to 0.84; in ROI-based analysis, correlation coefficient was up to 0.87. In addition, the clinical validation showed that the T2 maps of SE-EPI at b = 0 and CPMG-based T2 have similar statistical significance in differentiating between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) with mean and standard deviation of 81.6 ± 13.8 vs 72.2 ± 8.5 (SE-EPI) and 108.9 ± 37.8 vs 87.5 ± 10.6 (CPMG). Thus, this work suggests that the SE-EPI method could be considered as a candidate for fast T2 mapping, and be used alone or combined with diffusion in multi-parametric analysis.