Bruna Genari, Romulo Cantarelli, Antonio da Silva RAMOS NETO, E. B. E. Silva, F. Degrazia
{"title":"不同异种移植颗粒大小的鼻窦增强骨形成:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Bruna Genari, Romulo Cantarelli, Antonio da Silva RAMOS NETO, E. B. E. Silva, F. Degrazia","doi":"10.1590/1981-86372022006020210006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The commercial bovine bone mineral most commonly used is available in two particle sizes and studies have demonstrated contradictory results regarding bone formation volume using small or large particles. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume in sinus floor augmentation using small and large particles. The following outcome measures were assessed: bone formation volume (%) and residual bovine bone particles volume (%) assessed by histomorphometric analysis. The initial screening resulted in 236 records. After removal of duplicated articles and analysis of titles, abstracts and full texts, three articles were included in the meta-analysis. The bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume did not differ between small and large particles, with low heterogeneity of studies. The particle size of bovine bone mineral did not influence bone formation percentage; small and large particles of bovine bone graft presented similar residual bone mineral; more randomized clinical trials should be performed to completely confirm that bovine bone mineral particle size does not affect the result of sinus floor augmentation.","PeriodicalId":30069,"journal":{"name":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone formation in sinus augmentation with different xenograft particle sizes: systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Bruna Genari, Romulo Cantarelli, Antonio da Silva RAMOS NETO, E. B. E. Silva, F. Degrazia\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1981-86372022006020210006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The commercial bovine bone mineral most commonly used is available in two particle sizes and studies have demonstrated contradictory results regarding bone formation volume using small or large particles. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume in sinus floor augmentation using small and large particles. The following outcome measures were assessed: bone formation volume (%) and residual bovine bone particles volume (%) assessed by histomorphometric analysis. The initial screening resulted in 236 records. After removal of duplicated articles and analysis of titles, abstracts and full texts, three articles were included in the meta-analysis. The bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume did not differ between small and large particles, with low heterogeneity of studies. The particle size of bovine bone mineral did not influence bone formation percentage; small and large particles of bovine bone graft presented similar residual bone mineral; more randomized clinical trials should be performed to completely confirm that bovine bone mineral particle size does not affect the result of sinus floor augmentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372022006020210006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-86372022006020210006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bone formation in sinus augmentation with different xenograft particle sizes: systematic review and meta-analysis
ABSTRACT The commercial bovine bone mineral most commonly used is available in two particle sizes and studies have demonstrated contradictory results regarding bone formation volume using small or large particles. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume in sinus floor augmentation using small and large particles. The following outcome measures were assessed: bone formation volume (%) and residual bovine bone particles volume (%) assessed by histomorphometric analysis. The initial screening resulted in 236 records. After removal of duplicated articles and analysis of titles, abstracts and full texts, three articles were included in the meta-analysis. The bone formation volume and residual bovine bone volume did not differ between small and large particles, with low heterogeneity of studies. The particle size of bovine bone mineral did not influence bone formation percentage; small and large particles of bovine bone graft presented similar residual bone mineral; more randomized clinical trials should be performed to completely confirm that bovine bone mineral particle size does not affect the result of sinus floor augmentation.