D. Papadogiannis, M. Dimitriadi, M. Zafiropoulou, M. Gaintantzopoulou, G. Eliades
{"title":"通用牙用钴铬合金和氧化锆胶粘剂的反应性和粘接强度","authors":"D. Papadogiannis, M. Dimitriadi, M. Zafiropoulou, M. Gaintantzopoulou, G. Eliades","doi":"10.3390/dj7030078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to evaluate (a) the reactivity of six universal dental adhesives with polished cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) alloy and zirconia (3Y-TZP) surfaces; and (b) to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin composite with polished and alumina-blasted surfaces as mediated by these adhesives. The products tested were Adhese Universal (AD), All-Bond Universal (AB), Clearfill Universal Bond (CB), G-Premio Bond (GP), Prelude One (PO) and Scotchbond Universal (SB). The reactivity on polished substrates was evaluated by reflection infrared microscopy (RFTIRM). The roughness parameters of polished and 50 μm alumina grit-blasted surfaces were assessed by optical profilometry. The SBS of the composite bonded to the substrates treated with each adhesive (n = 10/product) was evaluated after 1 week of storage (H2O/37 °C) by Weibull statistics. Evidence of phosphate interaction with polished substrates was obtained by FTIRM, with higher peaks on the alloy. Alumina-blasting increased all roughness parameters with higher values on the alloy. AD, CB were the strongest (σ0) treatments on alloy surfaces and AD, CB, AB, SB on zirconia. GP was the weakest on both substrates and the least reliable (β) on alloy. On polished alloy GP, PO performed better (σ0), whereas on zirconia there were no significant differences. All adhesives showed more prominent reaction with the Co-Cr alloy than with 3Y-TZP.","PeriodicalId":47284,"journal":{"name":"Open Dentistry Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactivity and Bond Strength of Universal Dental Adhesives with Co-Cr Alloy and Zirconia\",\"authors\":\"D. Papadogiannis, M. Dimitriadi, M. Zafiropoulou, M. Gaintantzopoulou, G. Eliades\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj7030078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to evaluate (a) the reactivity of six universal dental adhesives with polished cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) alloy and zirconia (3Y-TZP) surfaces; and (b) to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin composite with polished and alumina-blasted surfaces as mediated by these adhesives. The products tested were Adhese Universal (AD), All-Bond Universal (AB), Clearfill Universal Bond (CB), G-Premio Bond (GP), Prelude One (PO) and Scotchbond Universal (SB). The reactivity on polished substrates was evaluated by reflection infrared microscopy (RFTIRM). The roughness parameters of polished and 50 μm alumina grit-blasted surfaces were assessed by optical profilometry. The SBS of the composite bonded to the substrates treated with each adhesive (n = 10/product) was evaluated after 1 week of storage (H2O/37 °C) by Weibull statistics. Evidence of phosphate interaction with polished substrates was obtained by FTIRM, with higher peaks on the alloy. Alumina-blasting increased all roughness parameters with higher values on the alloy. AD, CB were the strongest (σ0) treatments on alloy surfaces and AD, CB, AB, SB on zirconia. GP was the weakest on both substrates and the least reliable (β) on alloy. On polished alloy GP, PO performed better (σ0), whereas on zirconia there were no significant differences. All adhesives showed more prominent reaction with the Co-Cr alloy than with 3Y-TZP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
本研究的目的是评估(a)六种具有抛光钴铬合金(Co-Cr)和氧化锆(3Y-TZP)表面的通用牙胶粘剂的反应性;以及(b)评估树脂复合材料在这些粘合剂的作用下与抛光和喷铝表面的剪切结合强度(SBS)。测试产品为Adhese Universal (AD)、All-Bond Universal (AB)、Clearfill Universal Bond (CB)、G-Premio Bond (GP)、Prelude One (PO)和Scotchbond Universal (SB)。用反射红外显微镜(RFTIRM)评价了其在抛光基底上的反应性。采用光学轮廓术对抛光表面和50 μm氧化铝喷砂表面的粗糙度参数进行了评估。每种胶粘剂(n = 10个/个)处理的复合材料与基材粘合的SBS在水/37℃储存1周后通过Weibull统计进行评估。磷酸盐与抛光衬底相互作用的证据是通过FTIRM获得的,在合金上有更高的峰。喷铝提高了合金的所有粗糙度参数,且粗糙度值较高。AD、CB是合金表面最强的(σ0)处理,AD、CB、AB、SB是氧化锆表面最强的(σ0)处理。GP在两种基体上都是最弱的,在合金上是最不可靠的(β)。在抛光合金GP上,PO表现较好(σ0),而在氧化锆上无显著差异。所有胶粘剂与Co-Cr合金的反应均比与3Y-TZP的反应更明显。
Reactivity and Bond Strength of Universal Dental Adhesives with Co-Cr Alloy and Zirconia
The aim of this study was to evaluate (a) the reactivity of six universal dental adhesives with polished cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) alloy and zirconia (3Y-TZP) surfaces; and (b) to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of a resin composite with polished and alumina-blasted surfaces as mediated by these adhesives. The products tested were Adhese Universal (AD), All-Bond Universal (AB), Clearfill Universal Bond (CB), G-Premio Bond (GP), Prelude One (PO) and Scotchbond Universal (SB). The reactivity on polished substrates was evaluated by reflection infrared microscopy (RFTIRM). The roughness parameters of polished and 50 μm alumina grit-blasted surfaces were assessed by optical profilometry. The SBS of the composite bonded to the substrates treated with each adhesive (n = 10/product) was evaluated after 1 week of storage (H2O/37 °C) by Weibull statistics. Evidence of phosphate interaction with polished substrates was obtained by FTIRM, with higher peaks on the alloy. Alumina-blasting increased all roughness parameters with higher values on the alloy. AD, CB were the strongest (σ0) treatments on alloy surfaces and AD, CB, AB, SB on zirconia. GP was the weakest on both substrates and the least reliable (β) on alloy. On polished alloy GP, PO performed better (σ0), whereas on zirconia there were no significant differences. All adhesives showed more prominent reaction with the Co-Cr alloy than with 3Y-TZP.