1999年至2018年期间,各国的人类发展指数水平是否可持续?自举分位数回归方法的一个应用

Anju Goswami, Hiranmmoy Roy, Prashant Giri
{"title":"1999年至2018年期间,各国的人类发展指数水平是否可持续?自举分位数回归方法的一个应用","authors":"Anju Goswami,&nbsp;Hiranmmoy Roy,&nbsp;Prashant Giri","doi":"10.1016/j.susoc.2021.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Potential growth and overall economic development across nations since 1990s till 2018 is functioning as a 'wake-up' call for researchers and policy makers to process for investigation the phenomenon of HDI convergence globally <em>via</em> two framework: <em>σ</em>- and unconditional <em>β</em>- convergence. A proper investigation of such knowledge is of utmost important for regulators of economies, suggesting whether the difference in HDI level across natons has narrowed, including the period of global recession (2007/09). The empirical evidence is analyzed from different methods that act in a complementary way: i) bootstrap quantile regression approach in static panel framework, which allows the assumption of nonlinearities, especially for those groups that have shared a common path in terms of economic development while estimating the convergence results. ii) pooled OLS model, which seek to examine the soundness of the evaluated convergence results and confirmed the validity of our core applied model. All methods revealed strong evidences of unconditional <em>β</em>- convergence for all HDI groups, reflecting all classified HDI groups had potential to increase their tendency toward convergence. This is mainly driven by both the slower forward mobility with the less developed nations and faster backward mobility with the more developed nations. The <em>σ</em>- convergence estimates provides further insights and suggests that the formation and comprising of multiple convergence HDI clusters is a salient feature of reduction in inequality and dispersion across medium and lower nations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101201,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 127-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.06.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does HDIs level sustainable during 1999/2018 across cross-nations? An application of bootstrap quantile regression approach\",\"authors\":\"Anju Goswami,&nbsp;Hiranmmoy Roy,&nbsp;Prashant Giri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.susoc.2021.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Potential growth and overall economic development across nations since 1990s till 2018 is functioning as a 'wake-up' call for researchers and policy makers to process for investigation the phenomenon of HDI convergence globally <em>via</em> two framework: <em>σ</em>- and unconditional <em>β</em>- convergence. A proper investigation of such knowledge is of utmost important for regulators of economies, suggesting whether the difference in HDI level across natons has narrowed, including the period of global recession (2007/09). The empirical evidence is analyzed from different methods that act in a complementary way: i) bootstrap quantile regression approach in static panel framework, which allows the assumption of nonlinearities, especially for those groups that have shared a common path in terms of economic development while estimating the convergence results. ii) pooled OLS model, which seek to examine the soundness of the evaluated convergence results and confirmed the validity of our core applied model. All methods revealed strong evidences of unconditional <em>β</em>- convergence for all HDI groups, reflecting all classified HDI groups had potential to increase their tendency toward convergence. This is mainly driven by both the slower forward mobility with the less developed nations and faster backward mobility with the more developed nations. The <em>σ</em>- convergence estimates provides further insights and suggests that the formation and comprising of multiple convergence HDI clusters is a salient feature of reduction in inequality and dispersion across medium and lower nations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Operations and Computers\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 127-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.06.001\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Operations and Computers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412721000210\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412721000210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

从20世纪90年代到2018年,各国的潜在增长和整体经济发展为研究人员和政策制定者敲响了“警钟”,要求他们通过两个框架(σ收敛和无条件β收敛)对全球HDI趋同现象进行调查。对这些知识进行适当的调查对于经济体的监管者来说是至关重要的,这表明各国之间的人类发展指数水平差异是否已经缩小,包括全球经济衰退时期(2007/09)。从不同的方法中分析了经验证据,这些方法以互补的方式起作用:i)静态面板框架中的自举分位数回归方法,该方法允许假设非线性,特别是对于那些在经济发展方面共享共同路径的群体,同时估计收敛结果。ii) pooled OLS模型,旨在检验评估的收敛结果的稳健性,并确认我们的核心应用模型的有效性。结果表明,所有HDI组均存在无条件的β-收敛性,表明所有HDI分类组都有可能增加其收敛倾向。这主要是由于欠发达国家的前进流动性较慢,而较发达国家的向后流动性较快。σ-收敛估计提供了进一步的见解,并表明多个收敛HDI集群的形成和组成是中低等国家之间不平等和分散减少的一个显著特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does HDIs level sustainable during 1999/2018 across cross-nations? An application of bootstrap quantile regression approach

Potential growth and overall economic development across nations since 1990s till 2018 is functioning as a 'wake-up' call for researchers and policy makers to process for investigation the phenomenon of HDI convergence globally via two framework: σ- and unconditional β- convergence. A proper investigation of such knowledge is of utmost important for regulators of economies, suggesting whether the difference in HDI level across natons has narrowed, including the period of global recession (2007/09). The empirical evidence is analyzed from different methods that act in a complementary way: i) bootstrap quantile regression approach in static panel framework, which allows the assumption of nonlinearities, especially for those groups that have shared a common path in terms of economic development while estimating the convergence results. ii) pooled OLS model, which seek to examine the soundness of the evaluated convergence results and confirmed the validity of our core applied model. All methods revealed strong evidences of unconditional β- convergence for all HDI groups, reflecting all classified HDI groups had potential to increase their tendency toward convergence. This is mainly driven by both the slower forward mobility with the less developed nations and faster backward mobility with the more developed nations. The σ- convergence estimates provides further insights and suggests that the formation and comprising of multiple convergence HDI clusters is a salient feature of reduction in inequality and dispersion across medium and lower nations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A short term multistep forecasting model for photovoltaic generation using deep learning model Green hydrogen as a sustainable operations strategy: A socio-economic perspective A stochastic sustainable Closed-Loop Supply Chain Networks for used solar photovoltaic systems: Meta-heuristic comparison and real case study A systematic review of life cycle assessments of 3D concrete printing A sustainable multi-objective model for the hazardous waste location-routing problem: A real case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1