代际收入流动与积极自由的经济自由

Justin T. Callais, Vincent J. Geloso
{"title":"代际收入流动与积极自由的经济自由","authors":"Justin T. Callais, Vincent J. Geloso","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3939909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economic freedom is often defined as a negative liberty – freedom from interference. This contrasts with positive liberty which is defined as freedom to do which refers to capacities. A well-established literature argues that income inequality reduces positive liberty by limiting the capacities of those at the bottom of the income ladder. This limitation generates the byproduct of a greater persistence of socio-economic status as measured by statistics of intergenerational income mobility. Thus, a case is made for policies that could reduce negative liberty (i.e. reductions in economic freedom) in order to enhance positive liberty. However, this argument neglects the issue of whether economic freedom generates positive liberty by increasing economic growth and the number of options available for people to escape from their initial condition. In this paper, we empirically evaluate – using new data on intergenerational income mobility – this question and argue that economic freedom does strongly relate to positive liberty. Even more interestingly, the (positive) effect of economic freedom is found to be stronger than the (negative) effect of inequality.","PeriodicalId":18085,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Employment","volume":"47 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intergenerational Income Mobility and Economic Freedom as Positive Liberty\",\"authors\":\"Justin T. Callais, Vincent J. Geloso\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3939909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Economic freedom is often defined as a negative liberty – freedom from interference. This contrasts with positive liberty which is defined as freedom to do which refers to capacities. A well-established literature argues that income inequality reduces positive liberty by limiting the capacities of those at the bottom of the income ladder. This limitation generates the byproduct of a greater persistence of socio-economic status as measured by statistics of intergenerational income mobility. Thus, a case is made for policies that could reduce negative liberty (i.e. reductions in economic freedom) in order to enhance positive liberty. However, this argument neglects the issue of whether economic freedom generates positive liberty by increasing economic growth and the number of options available for people to escape from their initial condition. In this paper, we empirically evaluate – using new data on intergenerational income mobility – this question and argue that economic freedom does strongly relate to positive liberty. Even more interestingly, the (positive) effect of economic freedom is found to be stronger than the (negative) effect of inequality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Employment\",\"volume\":\"47 6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Employment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3939909\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3939909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

经济自由通常被定义为一种消极的自由——不受干涉的自由。这与积极自由形成对比,积极自由被定义为行动的自由,指的是能力。一项成熟的文献认为,收入不平等通过限制收入阶梯底部的人的能力,减少了积极的自由。从代际收入流动的统计数据来看,这种限制产生了更持久的社会经济地位的副产品。因此,为了增强积极自由,可以采取减少消极自由(即减少经济自由)的政策。然而,这一论点忽略了经济自由是否通过增加经济增长和人们逃离初始状态的可用选择数量来产生积极自由的问题。在本文中,我们使用代际收入流动性的新数据对这个问题进行了实证评估,并认为经济自由确实与积极自由密切相关。更有趣的是,经济自由的(积极)影响被发现比不平等的(消极)影响更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intergenerational Income Mobility and Economic Freedom as Positive Liberty
Economic freedom is often defined as a negative liberty – freedom from interference. This contrasts with positive liberty which is defined as freedom to do which refers to capacities. A well-established literature argues that income inequality reduces positive liberty by limiting the capacities of those at the bottom of the income ladder. This limitation generates the byproduct of a greater persistence of socio-economic status as measured by statistics of intergenerational income mobility. Thus, a case is made for policies that could reduce negative liberty (i.e. reductions in economic freedom) in order to enhance positive liberty. However, this argument neglects the issue of whether economic freedom generates positive liberty by increasing economic growth and the number of options available for people to escape from their initial condition. In this paper, we empirically evaluate – using new data on intergenerational income mobility – this question and argue that economic freedom does strongly relate to positive liberty. Even more interestingly, the (positive) effect of economic freedom is found to be stronger than the (negative) effect of inequality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deregulating Teacher Labor Markets Trends in Commuting Time of European Workers: A Cross-Country Analysis Labor Market Networks and Asset Returns Intergenerational Income Mobility and Economic Freedom as Positive Liberty Gender Identity, Co-Working Spouses and Relative Income within Households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1